Wow, the “AI SLOP DETECTED” tantrum…AGAIN with the same screengrab from a children’s cartoon? At least mix up your copyright violations—reposting the exact same frame from Captain Underpants across all my pages is peak lazy. If anything’s “slop,” it’s that.
You’re railing against AI for being “bad for art” while posting the same low-effort spam using copyrighted material you didn’t make, don’t own, and definitely didn’t license.
That’s not criticism—that’s hypocritical projection.
If you're trying to be the self-appointed guardian of artistic integrity, maybe start by not stealing frames from a 2017 animated film to prove your point. Generate an image of your own to prove your point.
Until then, your comments are about as meaningful as yelling “plagiarism” while photocopying a comic book.
Rylander128, ah, the classic “AI SLOP DETECTED” scream—delivered via a low-effort screenshot ripped from a children’s movie made by DreamWorks.
You’re crying about AI “ruining art” while using literal copyrighted material you didn’t create, don’t own, and probably couldn’t explain without a Wiki tab open.
If you're going to posture as some kind of digital art gatekeeper, maybe start by not violating copyright law with a screencap from a 2017 cartoon.
Until then, your argument has as much weight as a water balloon at a knife fight.
You're right to point out that judgment without self-reflection is a sin, and I accept that in bringing up the sins of others, I too am held to that standard. But let’s be clear: I’m not claiming to be without fault—I am “guilty” of publicly stating uncomfortable facts. If that's a sin, it's a very different kind than the ones listed above, which involve abuse of power, exploitation, and, in many cases, criminal or deeply unethical behavior.
You asked, “Did any of these people personally hurt you?” But that's not the right question. By that logic, only victims can ever speak about injustice—and even then, only their own. Should we not criticize corruption unless it lands directly on our doorstep? Should we stay silent when public servants betray public trust?
Also, consider this: in publicly criticizing me for simply listing verified facts, you’ve done exactly what you’re accusing me of—calling someone out publicly. The difference is I called out hypocrisy with evidence. You responded with personal judgment, not factual rebuttal.
Let’s also not forget the context: my post came in response to a sweeping claim that Democrats spend their day indulging in sin. That original meme weaponized faith to attack an entire group. If we’re going to call out sin, let’s do it consistently, not selectively.
In the end, this isn’t about scoring points—it’s about humility, honesty, and accountability. If we want to have moral conversations, we have to start by being impeccable with our words and fair in our standards—no matter the political jersey. That’s not judgment. That’s integrity.
