Mathematics Memes & GIFs

This is a stream where you can post anything that's related to Mathematics!

129 followers

Mathematics

To post images in this stream, please .

Moderators

Dea. Lyoll OWNER

Create your own stream

Imgflip Pro

AI creation tools & better GIFs
No ads
Custom 6x6 profile icon and new colors
Your images are featured instantly in auto-approve-sfw streams
Your images jump to the top of approval queues

Go Pro

TOE MATH STUDIES guiled⩰ into art: 3\3 ((hindsight idea series progressive loss. technically one can decode stats. CODE=EaSy! )

$TOE MATH STUDIES guiled⩰ into art: 3\3 ((hindsight idea series progressive loss. technically one can decode stats. CODE=EaSy! ) | THESESESAREABOUTHARING0 UPS, <1H NOTE ON SELF DEFLARED SWAN SONG- NO ISSUE OF SEPARATION, WILL CONTINUE TO POST THE USUAL JUNK IN OTHER STREAM: THESE MEMETIC ART REALLY IS PART OF A LONG HISTORY. I'VE DONE SO MUCH MATH IN THE LAST DECADE. NO FAULT EXCEPT THE UNIVERSE ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ THE WHEELS HAVE SPUN. SO WHEN EVER THE LAST GREATEST THEOREM AND WRITINGS ARE REPLACED BY NEW CONCEPTS, SYMBOLS AND EQUATIONS? I FEEL TO NOT WASTE, AND CREATE SCULPTURAL PIECES AROUND THEM. MY BROTHER HAD THE ART GENE AN D SO DID MY FATHER. WHAT I USE FOR THE SCULPTURAL PI ECES BESIDES THE MAT H WRITINGS IS THINGS LYIN G AROUND THE HOUSE. TH ESE 'BACKING MATERIALS' AR E COINCIDENTALLY UNNEED ED TOO. LIKE SAND PAINTIN GS WITHIN A YEAR THE PIE CES ARE TOSSED OUT, . . . . . . . . .INVARIABLY BY SO MYSTIC AL CHOICE IN THE MO MENT. THESE ONLI NE IMAGE SCU LPTURES M AY BE M ORE P E R M A N E N T; HENRY ROLLINS QUOTES: 'HOPE IS THE LAST THING A PERSON DOES BEFORE THEY ARE DEFEATED' CONTRAST TO T. S ELLIOT'S POEM: "I SAID TO MY SOUL, BE STILL, AND WAIT WITHOUT HOPE FOR HOPE WOULD BE HOPE FOR THE WRONG THING;" ME: TO THINK THAT TWO MONTHS AGO I CONTINUED DREAMS OF SELLING ON LINE SCRAPS OF HANDWRITTEN DRAFTS OF SKETCHES OF THEOREMS | image tagged in extreme long template,thank you for making this template,math-to-rt,pray for kc,sunday,______ | made w/ Imgflip meme maker$

by anonymous

114 views, 5 comments

TOE MATH STUDIES morphed⩰ into art: 1\3 ((one of two that has a featured rendition of the obscured text)

$TOE MATH STUDIES morphed⩰ into art: 1\3 ((one of two that has a featured rendition of the obscured text) | ⁕; FEEL ING DEEP IM PACT AND DREAM ING VAN GOGH '' '' A WILD LY BAD LY PA RA PHARASED ED DIE VED DER LYR IC; AS FOOT NOTE TO THE TIME SPENT ON THIS STREAM: I'M SEEING THINGS IN A DIFFERENT WAY AS ONE SPACE-NAUGHT ONCE SAID TO ANOTHER.* I NOW REALIZE THAT THE MATHEMATICS STREAM MAY HAVE BEEN REVIVED IF IN A WHACKY WAY BY THESE TEN OR TWENTY FEATURES OF ONE PERSON. WHILE IN MY WILDEST DREAMS THERE WAS MOVEMENT AROUND '''TGEORYBHERE''''. SO MUCH EASIER ON ME IN THAT CASE, AT THE SAME TIME NO ONE SAID THESES WORDS DREAD MORE THAN REJECTION NOTIFICATIONS: GTFO. SO WE BELIEVE WITH AN UPVOTE HERE AND THERE AND ONE ODDLY UNSUPPORTIVE COMMENT THAT I? DID NO CO-OPTING OF ANY SOCIAL MEDIA SPACE TO CONCERN MYSELF WITH. | image tagged in longart,toeish,raw,math-to-art,sunday,______ | made w/ Imgflip meme maker$

by anonymous

138 views, 3 comments

That’s a fact

by Adewbsteronimgflip

46 views

For Anthony Corkern who asked me to define Zen.

$For Anthony Corkern who asked me to define Zen. | WHAT HAPPENS WHEN WE ATTEMPT TO PROVE THAT THIS STATEMENT {'MATHEMATICAL ABSOLUTES EXIST'} IS TRUE. WELL TO START MATHEMATICS ITSELF DOES NOT EXIST. SPECIFICALLY OBVIOUSLY MATHEMATICAL ABSOLUTES DON'T EXIST. THERE IS NO ZERO OR INFINITY OR EVEN A PERFECT UNIT DEFINITION OF ONE BEYOND THE REALM OF MATHEMATICS.YET WITHIN MATHEMATICS WE PRESUME PROOFS CAN BE MADE REGARDING ABSOLUTES. APPARENTLY THEN THE THEOREM MIGHT BE ILL FORMED. {'MATHEMATICAL IN-ABSOLUTES DO NOT EXIST'} SEEMS TO BE ALL THAT WE MIGHT ACCOMPLISH. THIS IS AS ALSO ACTUALLY NOT QUITE THERE. THAT IS FROM WITHIN MATHS ABSOLUTES ARE AXIOMATIC. AND FROM WITHOUT THEY ARE IN-EXISTANT. SO THE RESTATE THEOREM SIMPLY ADMITS THAT OUTSIDE OF MATHS THERE ARE IN- ABSOLUTE CONCEPTS. YET MATHS CAN NOT THEORIZE ABOUT NON- MATHS.THAT IS THE RESTATE SIMPLY SAYS {'NON-MATHEMATICAL IN- ABSOLUTES DO EXIST'} IF THESE TWO RESTATINGS WERE LOGICAL PROVINESS THEN {"NON-MATHEMATICAL IN- ABSOLUTES"↦"MATHEMATICAL ABSOLUTES"} YET OF COURSE IS NOT BE CAUSE OF CONSTRUCTIVENESS CONCERN. AND ALSO JUST SILLY. HOWEVER IF WE LOOK AT CERTAIN ABSOLUTES MAYBE SOME GET AROUND CONSTRUCTIVE CONCERNS AND OTHERS DO NOT. AND ONE IN PARTICULAR MIGHT GET AROUND ABSOLUTE-GET-AROUNDS VS ABSOLUTE-NOT-GET-AROUNDS EQUIVALENTLY. {"NON-MATHEMATICAL ABSENCES IN-EXISTING"↦"MATHEMATICAL ABSENCES"} THAT IS DOES MATHEMATICS ITSELF NOT EXISTING FROM A NON-MATHS VIEWPOINT IMPLY THE EXISTANCE OF ABSOLUTES LIKE ZERO FROM WITHIN MATHS. THIS IS PARADOXICALLY DEFINING ZERO IN A WAY WE CAN THINK OF AS NEGATIVE ZERO. IF ZERO IS IMPLIED WITHIN MATHS BY MATHS OWN IN-EXISTANCE THEN CLEARLY THERE IS A RECURSION {(-0)=(-0)^∞}. UN-FORTUNETELY THEN TO 'RECONSTITUTE ZERO' REQUIRES {(-0)^∞^0=0}. THERE CAN BE NO RATIO OF ZERO WITHIN MATHS TO ZERO WITHOUT IF THE LATER IS A FUNCTION OF TH FORMER. SO THERE CAN BE NO RATIO EITHER. NOR CLEARLY A SIMPLE DIFFERENCE BECAUSE NO {0=0-0} IS DEFINED AT ALL YET. A GOOSE CHASE. HOWEVER WHAT ABOUT GRANDLY {"NON MATHEMATICAL NON-SENSE"↦"MATHEMATICAL SENSE"} HERE WE ARE CLAIMING ABOVE AND BEYOND THE INEXISTENCE OF MATHEMATICS FROM AN OUTSIDERS VIEW ALSO IT'S UN-INTELLIGEBILILTY. THIS SPEAKS TO THE PROPERTY OF ABSOLUTES MORE CLEARLY. MATHS IS RATHER NONSENSICAL TO FINITE BEINGS AS REGARDS FOR EXAMPLE INFINITE PROPERTIES. YET IS THIS MORE CONSTRUCTIVE. PERHAPS THE VERY FACT THAT AXIOMATIC ZERO APPEARS AS AXIOMATIC NEGATIVE ZERO MATTERS NOW. WE'VE SHOWN THAT NEGATIVE ZERO CANNOT DEFINE ZERO. DENYING THE UTILITY OF MINUS ZERO WOULD STOP RECURSION. SO IF F(0)≠0 BECAUSE G(-0)≠(-0) IS CLAIMED AS AXIOMATIC WHAT HAPPENS TO THE PERCEPTION OF SENSICALITY. WELL {"MATHEMATICAL NON-SENSE"¬↦"MATHEMATICAL SENSE"} WAS STANDARD STATE WITHOUT CONSTRAINT FROM THE RECURSION WITHIN MATHS. IE (-0)=(0). AND NOW THE NEGATION OF THAT WITH OUR DISAXIOMATIZING OF ZERO? WE NEED TO TAKE THE NOTION OF NEGATIVE ABSENCE SERIOUSLY FROM WITHOUT. THAT IS STOPPING RECURSION FROM WITHIN AS 'NO MINUS ZERO' CAN RELAX OUR ABSENCE VIEWING WITHOUT TO,LITERAL {"MATHS IS NEGATIVE ZERO'}. THIS HAS A RIPPLE EFFECT ON ITS SENSELESS APPRECIATION. {'MATHS IS SENSELESS ONLY TO THE DEGREE THAT NEGATIVE ZERO IS RECURSIVE"} IN OTHERVWORDS ALLOWING {'THIS STATEMENTING IS FALSE"↔"ALL MATHS IS FALSE"} IS NOW DISALLOWED. WE CANNOT MAKE PARADOXES THAT RELY ON A NOT OPERATOR. WE CAN ONLY PARADOXICALLY SAY THING THAT ARE AXIOMATIZED FROM WITHOUT AS NON LOGIC. SO {A LITERAL STATING OF ZENO'S PARADOX IS POSSIBLE AS FAR AS IT'S OWN METAPHORICAL APPROACH TO A MEANINGFUL LITERALLLISM OF ITSELF"}. THAT IS GOO YETBIS REALLY A STATEMENT ANALOG OF THIS QUESTION BLOCK: {'IS THIS A MEANINGFUL QUESTION'↠'YES'¬↠'NO'}. A QUESTION BLOCK TELLS US IF THIS WERE RECURSED WHAT WE COULD NOT DO AS FAR AS STATEMENTING MORE SUCCINCTLY. SO NOW INFINITE SENSELESSNESS FROM WITHOUT CAN LEAD TO ITS DECONSTRUCTION FROM WITHIN MATHS PROVINESS! WHAT INEXISTS SENSELESSLY OUTSIDE OF MATHSS FOR ALL INTENTS AND PURPOSES IS THE GROUND STATE OF DISINFORMATION. AN INFORMATIONLESS ENDLESS, SPECIFICALLY POSITIVE ENDLESS STRINGS OF IS WHAT MUSTED BE DELICATELY HANDLED WITH PIN MATHS. IF E^0=Π^0 ITS RATHER EASY TO DERIVE THIS WAY. {(((∞+1)/(∞))^∞)*(Π)=(((∞+1)/ (∞))^∞)*(Π)} TAKING INFINITE ROOT [AND NOT REVEALING PLAY REGARDING OVER-INFINITE POWERS OF IMAGINARIES HERE, NOW] {(∞+1)/(∞)*(E+(1/∞))=(((∞+1)/(∞))^∞)*(E+(1/∞))} REWRITING. {(∞)/(∞-1)*(E+(1/∞))=(((∞)/(∞-1))^∞)*(E+(1/∞))} AND CHANGING SIDES {(∞-1)/(∞)*(E+(1/∞))=(((∞-1)/(∞))^∞)*(E+(1/∞))} CALL THAT $ IN A PERHAPS UNFORGIVABLE CO-OPT. SAY 'RAVENOUS'. {$*(E+(1/∞)-(1∞))=$*E} NOW TAKE {(1/∞)}=$/∞}, {$*E*∞+$+$=E*(∞-1)} WHERE {$/∞+$/∞=$/∞} SO {$*E*∞+$=E*∞-E} OMG {$*E*(∞+1)=E*(∞-1)} AND {$=E*(∞-1)/E*(∞+1)} YET THE RAVENOUS NUMBER IS THE NEGATIVE MEANINGLESS NUMBER THAT CAN BE ALLOWED IN-MATH SO TRUST US THAT {$=((1/∞)-1)=E^0} THE VENOMOUS NUMBER THAT IS THE SENSELESS NUMBER THAT CAN ONLY EXIST OUT-MATH [SORRY MORE ANNOYINGEST CO-OPTING] IS {¥=(1-(1/∞)=√N)^0}. ANYONE CAN 'HAVE A GO' AT PROVING THE RATIO DIAGONALS OF DIAGONALS OF A SQUARE IN-MATH MUST DIFFER FROM OUT-MATHS BECAUSE IS A MEANINGLESS MODIFICATION TO A UNIT VALUE. SIMPLY PROVED ABSTRACTLY AN INFINITE SQUARE CAN EXIST ABSTRACTLY THOUGH NOT CONCRETELY. IF WE PRESUME AN AVERAGE RHOMBUS EXISTING IN- MATH AND OUT-MATH. BUT THE SAY 90 DEGREE TURN DISPLACES BETWEEN MATH NON-CENTIRC AND MATH CENTRIC? THEN INCONSISTENCY IS PRESERVED AND... AND INCOMPLETENESS WHICH MAY BE THE TYPICALLY UNCONSIDERED GODELIAN OPTION. INCONSISTENT BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY QUADRANTS CANNOT JUST BE ROTATED HOWEVER. AND INCOMPLETE BECAUSE THE VENOMOUS NUMBER AKA ¥ MUST NEVER BE UTILIZED AS SUCH. BEST CONVERTED MOST GENERALLY A FUNCTION OF THE GOLDEN AND/OR SILVER RATIO'S. | image tagged in long black template,toe,constructable,co-opted symbology,______,in-out-maths | made w/ Imgflip meme maker$