This is a stream where you can post anything that's related to Mathematics!
98 followers
Mathematics
To post images in this stream, please .
Moderators
Create your own stream
Imgflip Pro
- AI creation tools & better GIFs
- No ads
- Custom 6x6 profile icon and new colors
- Your images are featured instantly in auto-approve-sfw streams
- Your images jump to the top of approval queues
Go Pro
23 views, 1 upvote, 1 comment
96 views, 3 upvotes, 5 comments
112 views, 4 upvotes, 6 comments
84 views, 5 upvotes, 4 comments
!["And the men [women] who hold high places must be the one's to start, to mold a new mentality closer to the heart.'~Rush | SMALLEST PRIME
THAT IS SUM OF
PRIMES, 2 WAYS; IS THIS IMPORTANT. WELL WE COULD
MAKE A BIJECTIVE FOR SUMS IN N
WAYS. THAT IS THERE SHOULD BE AS
MANY PRIMES AS THERE NUMBERS
THAT ARE SUMS OF TWO PRIMES IN
HOWEVER MAY WAYS. THEN THREE IN
HOWEVER MANY WAYS. THEN FOUR
AND SO ON. HOWEVER AT INFINITY THE
NUMBER OF WAYS WOULD BE JUST
ONE. SO APPARENTLY OUR BIJECTIVE
WOULD HAVE TO INVOLVE ORDERED
SETS OR PERMUTATIONS. THAT IS THERE
ARE AS MANY PRIMES AS ORDERED
PAIRS OF PRIMES, ORDERED TRIPLETS.
QUADRUPLETS, ETC. YET THEN HEY
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN WE ARE FACED
WITH ORDERING BASED UPON SIMILAR
DIGIT SEQUENCES. PRESUME
CONJECTURALLY THAT SOME SET OF
INFINITE PRIMES HAS A TRAILING BIT
SEQUENCE OF ALTERNATING ONE'S AND
ZERO'S: ".....010101010101".
THERE'S NO WAY TO ORDER THIS SET
BASED UPON THE LEADING WHATEVER
BIT SEQUENCE AT INFINITY SUCH AS:
"11100101110000.....". PERHAPS
THEN IT WOULD BE REASONABLE TO
CONCLUDE THAT OUR BIJECTIVE WAS
ONLY POSSIBLE WITH RESPECT TO
PRIMES THAT HAVE INFINITELY
DISORDERED BIT SEQUENCES. THAT
MAKES THESE PRIMES ESSENTIALLY
REAL IN NATURE. SO IF WE HOPED TO
MAKE A BIJECTIVE BETWEEN PRIMES
AND REALS FOR INFINITE ACCOUNTING
WE'D BE BACK AT SQUARE ONE. YET
WHY STOP THERE. ISN'T IT BEST TO
COUNT DISORDERLY REAL STRINGS WITH
DISORDERLY INTEGER STRINGS
GENERALLY. SO TAKING THE
ISOMORPHICALLY REVERSE PERSPECTIVE
IT'S BEST TO NOT COUNT INFINITELY
WITH ORDERLY STRINGS. THEREFORE WE
ASK IF THE REAL BITSTRING:
'0.11111111......." IS MORE ORDERLY
THAN THE INTEGER BITSTRING:
"111111.....111111. IT IS BECAUSE
INFORMATION THEORY TELLS US THE
GREATER UNIFORMITY OF A STRING THE
LESS INFORMATION IT CONTAINS. YET
THIS INTEGER INFINITY TIMES THE REAL
HAS A SUM OF ITSELF PLUS THE INTEGER
STRING. WHEREAS INFINITY TIMES THE
INTEGER STRING HAS MERELY A
DUPLICATE OF ITS BITSTRING. COPIES OF
THINGS WE PRESUME PROVIDE EXTRA
INFORMATION. THEREFORE IF OUR
CONCEPT OF COUNTING ORDERLY THINGS
WITH EQUIVALENT ORDERLINESS (OF
THINGS) HAS ANY VALIDITY. THEN IT
CANNOT MAKE SENSE IN THE FIRST
PLACE TO SUGGEST THAT EVERY DISTINCT
INTEGER CAN COUNT EACH DISTINCT
REAL. THERE'S NOT ENOUGH INFO IN
WHAT WE TERM A VENOMOUSLY
ENDLESS STRING OF ONE'S TO COUNT IT'S
VENOMOUSLY ENDLESS STRING OF
DECIMAL ONE'S. SO THEN WE THOUGHT
HOW TO COUNT RATIO'S OF REALS OVER
THEMSELVES OR ZERO POWERS WHICH
MUST ALL PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION
THEN MERE UNIT DIGIT ONE BECAUSE
UNIT DIGIT ONE COULD BE DEFINED AS
THE RATION OF A ZERO POWER OF THE
VENOMOUS INTEGER. I MEAN WE
THOUGHT THAT CLEARLY WITH THIS PROOF.
SO TO PROVIDE THAT INFO THESE
THEMSELVES BECOME VENOMOUS
RATIO'S. WE CAN MODEL AS STEP-WISE
COUNTS OF REALS THAT ARE IRRATIONAL
AND POSITIVE OR STEP WISE THAT ARE
TRANSCENDENTAL AND NEGATIVE. WHY
DOES THE RATIO OF TRANSCENDENTALS
TO THEMSELVES CONTAIN EVEN MORE
INFORMATION. PRETTY MUCH THEIR
DEFINITION WHICH MAKES THEM
UNDEFINABLE AS POLYNOMIALS. SO
NEGATIVE INTEGER ONE'S STRINGS ALSO
HAVE MORE INFO THAN POSITIVE. LET'S
NOT MAKE A CONVOLUTED PROOF.
THERE'S A EXTRA SYMBOL IN THE FORM
OF THE NEGATIVE SIGN THAT IS DIS-
UNIFORM WITH RESPECT TO THE ONE'S
SYMBOLS. THAT IN TURN MAKES ZERO
POWERS OF TRANSCENDENTALS HAVE
NO OTHER MORE-INFORMATIVE OPTION!
WE ARE UNSURE YET IF THE GOLDEN
RATIO AND SILVER RATIO ZERO POWERS
ARE ANOTHER HIGHLY SPECIALLY ULTRA-
LESS UNINFORMATIVE REALS. WHATEVER
THE POINT IS THAT WHILE NEITHER THE
POSITIVE NOR NEGATIVE
INFORMATIONLESS VALUES, VENOMOUS
AND RAVENOUS, RESPECTIVELY ARE
EXPECTED TO FULFILL THEIR COUNTING
OBJECTIVES FOR INFINITE STRINGS?? THE
NEGATIVE ZERO REAL IS THE SPANNER
IN THE WORKS [R.STEWART...KIDDING].
IT DOES NOT NEED TO BE COUNTED AT
ALL. YET ITS INFORMATION DEFICIT IS
NULL. NEG ZERO NEVER NEEDED AS
NULL VALUE TO BE COUNTED BY INFINITE
STRINGS. SO AS ANOTHER
PRESUMPTION -NOT ASSUMPTION, WE
KNOW OUR MESS- TO MOVE THINGS
ALONG. THE FINITE INTEGERS
CONSTITUTE COLLECTIVELY THE FULL
INFORMATION DEFICIT WITH RESPECT TO
REAL COUNTS. AND THAT DEFICIT FOR POS
AND NEG FINITE INTEGERS IS MORE
THAN SUFFICIENT TO COUNT POSITIVE
ZERO. MIC DROP. 7 | image tagged in long blank white,set theory,disproof,saturday night live,cat in the hat with a bat ______ colorized,decontructed | made w/ Imgflip meme maker](http://i.imgflip.com/9kc71e.jpg)
![more proof to conjecture that ∞≠∞ now with successor showing case where ∞=∞ | successor: ℕ⇒∞=1;
ℤ⇒2⁕∞=∞+1; ℚ⇒(i/i)∞
=(i^3/i^3)⁕2⁕∞ ; ℝ⇒∞=∞; the best way to know something is to believe; a recalled proof. suppose
we take {(√2)^0=(∞-1)/∞}.
we generalize to infinity
{(√∞)^0=1/∞}. in between
is some Taylorish series
{(∞-0)⁕(∞-1)...(1)} nicely!
via {(√(π⁕2)=1⁕2⁕3...}
[mathacy] exceptionally
(π⁕e)^0=(√2)^0. this
disproves Schanuel's
conjecture. exercise:
prove ∞⁕e^3 is an integer. | image tagged in memes,change my mind,yesterday,dejected,wednesday,______ | made w/ Imgflip meme maker](http://i.imgflip.com/9jzzr9.jpg)
