College Liberal

A few things to point out...

1.) Yes, in fact IT IS A JOKE. This is IMGFLIP, not some informative article.

2.) I wouldn't know anything about abortions, since I am NOT A FEMALE and I don't decide to research about it in my pastime.

3.) I'm not taking away anyone's rights. I'm just making a point for people to think about.

4.) If you can't handle a little meme, I recommend you get off this site.

OhhhH!H!HHhHHH!!! No, that was my fault, haha. I thought you were serious.

How would you like it if your mother had an abortion?

Exactly. It's easy to say you're for abortions when you're alive. I'm simply against ALL death, both served by law and abortions...

I'm not fine with killing unborn children if:

They will not be born with health issues and the mother will be fine afterwards. They can just f**king set them up for adoption, I mean like 24 hours of extreme pain is worth a human life for God's f**king sake.

When I am fine:

When the mother will die or the child will instantly die (or just be a nuissance).

It's kinda sad that people can't see that adoption is a thing.

It is a human. The minute the two haploid gametes (egg&sperm) fuse to create a diploid zygote and cellular division begins said zygote is by scientific definition a living organism. This particular organism happens to have the DNA of a unique human offspring, and will grow into a unique human individual unless otherwise acted upon. It's not a frog. It's not a plant. It's a freaking human, Homo sapiens, and nothing else.

As for the "clump of cells" part, do you realize what you are made out of? Everything from your keratin hair and nails, to your skin, to your blood vessels to your cerebral membrane is cells. YOU ARE A CLUMP OF CELLS, I AM A CLUMP OF CELLS WE ARE ALL A CLUMP OF CELLS!!!
(Except for the synths)

If you aren't ready to raise a child, why are you having sex or even unprotected sex at that? That is not an excuse. It's a cop-out.

Over 99% of abortions are performed because the mother was pressured into having one by whomever and are performed because the mother doesn't want a child. Less than 1% of all abortions in this country are performed because of rape or incest, and not much higher because of the health of the child or mother. Again, a cop-out excuse.

If you truly did your research you would understand all of this. No, you don't care, because your idea that women have rights to their bodies trumps all other rights. You make up the fact a child has brain activity at 4-6 weeks and a heart beat at 4-6 weeks. It isn't a "clump of cells" with a heartbeat and brain activity.

Women's rights don't exsist because men's right don't. Try prostituting on the street corner and see how quickly you're arrested. Women's rights. That's hilarious.

That's about right. It is a very small percentage.

Where did you get your figures?

A little thing called the interwebs. Also, I read a lot.

Post links.

No. I don't post links because anything I do post is discredited as bias. Then there is a whole other argument and I don't wish to drag it on any further. I actually have several articles on the subject on my computer.

Ok well my research says you're complete wrong

Of course you think I'm wrong. You're a liberal who doesn't believe in protecting innocent life. You believe a woman's right to do as she pleases with her body trumps an innocent life. It's expected of you.

Is that what I think? Thanks for telling me what I think.

No its my turn: you believe in an invisible man and deny science. Furthermore you can't prove anything you be live in WITH science....because facts don't matter to you. Faith is all you have. Faith is emotion. You are driven by emotions. Emotions cloud judgement and deny logic. That's why you have such silly emotional, fact less, faith based beliefs.

Have a great day.

You get angry rather quickly, this I can tell. Just by the way you respond to my comments. I know what you think about abortion because you're a Liberal and almost all Liberals think the same on this matter. You'd rather protect a woman's right to do what she wants with her body and the life of a child within that body. You are the one denying science, since science has already proven that life has already begun inside the womb. Simple scientific facts.

You're faithless, you're immoral on this subject. You have more compassion for a grown woman and her so-called rights, than you have toward an innocent human being who is incapable of speaking for itself or defending itself. And because of this, you are a horrible human being. Yes, I said it. Anyone that thinks the way you do about an innocent human life is a horrible person.

You,as a Liberal, deny science. You believe in something that isn't real, just as you tell me I do because I believe in a higher power that created everything. You tell me I deny science because I put my faith in God. God created science. Science didn't start out of nothing.

Protecting the right of a woman to destroy life is sad and pathetic. Why not protect the right of the woman to wh.ore herself out? Or the right to walk around naked? After all, it is her body.

Don't want a baby? Keep your legs closed. Otherwise, quit murdering innocent children.

Nah...not angry at all. You think you know a lot...but you dont. And you generalize.

I think you're right though...a woman should be able to legally w**re herself out or walk around naked. Whatever. Doesn't hurt me.

For the record I am not for abortion after the fetus is viable outside the mother. But that's where *I* draw the line but I'm a man and will never have to make that decision. It's the woman's decision to make and deal with here and in the afterlife if she believe in that sort of thing.

Why did you censor "rape"?

I didn't censor anything, the site does.

Stem cells differentiated to cardiac cells beat after about 10 days. Nueral stem cells fire (are active) even faster. So what? Equating "activity" to any level of "life" is a false analogy.

Denying that a baby in the womb is alive and can feel pain is denying science, since it has already been proven scientifically that a baby can feel pain in the womb. Reaction to stimulous is very strong proof as well.

Reaction to stimulus is not proof of much except nerves work. Pain is not a reaction. Babies born with anencephaly react to stimuli because they have a brain stem. But they don't "think" or have other brain functions. They can eat, cry and breathe thanks to the primal functions of the brain stem. Sure they are "alive"....but not aware.

Similar to what you are proposing except waaaaaaay premature and without the benefit of a functioning brain.

They most certainly are aware. It has already been proven time and again that babies in the womb are aware of their surroundings both inside and outside. Mother sings to the unborn baby and the baby reacts and is aware of the mother singing to him/her. Simple observance. I have personally seen it. You can't tell me they're unaware of their surroundings.

If it's been "proven time and again" post some proof. I don't doubt there is awareness at some point before birth....I just probably think it happens later than you think. Again I'm open to proof though.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prenatal_perception