Bad Luck Brian

Bad Luck Brian Meme | HAPPY ABOUT NEW GUN LAW GETS SHOT BECAUSE CRIMINALS DON'T CARE ABOUT THE NEW GUN LAW | image tagged in memes,bad luck brian | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
27,256 views, 201 upvotes, Made by MikeRussum 26 months ago memesbad luck brian
Bad Luck Brian memeRe-caption this meme
Add Meme
Post Comment
reply
19 ups, 3 replies
Finding Neverland Meme | CRIMINALS DON'T CARE ABOUT GUN LAWS. CRIMINALS DON'T CARE ABOUT LAWS IN GENERAL. LAWS ARE POINTLESS. | image tagged in memes,finding neverland | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
What could be wrong with this logic?
reply
[deleted]
8 ups
REMOVE ALL LAWS THAT DON'T ELIMINATE CRIME PROBLEM SOLVED | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
[deleted]
7 ups
The point is that laws should target the behavior that is actually wrong rather than inappropriately burdening morally neutral behavior.
reply
[deleted]
1 up, 1 reply
. | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
https://imgflip.com/i/wyt1z
reply
0 ups
I don't see your logic. Guns already require licenses, as least concealed carry does. And it's not exactly easy to get a gun, every time i've gotten my guns cleaned, just cleaned, i've gotten a thorough background check done on me. I do think people need training, but requiring training and a license is a far cry from what most people, including Obama, are trying to do.
reply
16 ups, 1 reply
X, X Everywhere Meme | LOOK WOODY! A SIGN THAT SAY "NO GUNS" I FEEL SAFER.... | image tagged in memes,x,x everywhere,x x everywhere | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
[deleted]
12 ups
10 Guy Meme | GUN FREE ZONE? COOL, FREE GUNS | image tagged in memes,10 guy | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
15 ups
reply
13 ups, 1 reply
The only reason the government wants to restrict civilians from owning guns is because it's a lot harder to control its citizens when they're able to fight back.

Welcome to the next step in a new North American Nazi regeme.
reply
6 ups
Nailed it.... !
reply
12 ups, 3 replies
reply
5 ups
They should wear this button as well!
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
*criminal drives in his van looking for a place to rob*

*drives by sign*

*slowly reverses*

*reads sign carefully*

"What... I..."

*Gets out of van and robs house*

*Comes out with ten dollars and a lamp shade*

"Well I guess they didn't need to protect this house, there was nothing in there!"
reply
0 ups
Lol
reply
1 up
Love it!!
reply
10 ups, 1 reply
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
Well... That is true, I guess. Even though Hitler was a fascist dictator with a loathing for Jews, I see your point XD
reply
2 ups
Obama has a loathing for conservatives. Hitler = Obama = Illuminati CONFIRMED!!!
reply
8 ups, 1 reply
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
That's because getting a blunt weapon is easier than getting a gun. If citizens have guns, the chance of dying to a blunt weapon would be significantly lower.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
And more people would die of guns. Either way, people get killed.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
But I'd rather get shot then be hit by a blunt weapon a bunch of times.
reply
0 ups
That's a double-edged sword. Sure, less pain, but it also means you can kill more people faster as well.
reply
6 ups, 1 reply
reply
[deleted]
4 ups
Oh Thank Heaven for 7-11!
reply
6 ups, 1 reply
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
i hope he see's this xD
reply
1 up
reply
5 ups
reply
7 ups
reply
5 ups
reply
[deleted]
5 ups
reply
3 ups
Winner! This is the new NRA poster boy., totally!
reply
4 ups
reply
[deleted]
2 ups
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
that makes no fkn sense! how does criminals caring about gun laws make any diffrence? you stupid fkn yanks need to wise up! if you can buy guns, some poor fkrs gonna get shot, END OF...
reply
8 ups, 2 replies
Because if you outlaw guns, criminals will still obtain them, but law abiding citizens won't have them, and therefore won't be evenly matched against criminals who want to hurt them. What would you rather take to a gun fight? A knife or a gun? Or a tuna fish sandwich?
reply
4 ups
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
True, but the point of gun control is to restrict the flow of firearms to people who will use it for unlawful purposes while allowing people who deserve guns to obtain them.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
That's the claim. That's not how it always works in reality. That's like saying "let's outlaw every single drug", then you make heroin and meth illegal, but also aspirin and Benadryl
reply
1 up, 1 reply
When did I propose outlawing guns?
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
I was referring to people who do want to outlaw all guns
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
Thanks for clarifying. :-) I just want increased security against criminals that lets law abiding citizens use guns.
reply
2 ups
No problem :)
reply
2 ups
reply
3 ups
We still get to keep our guns, I'm fine.
reply
4 ups
reply
2 ups
reply
1 up, 1 reply
So, people who have "guns" and shoot people are "criminals"...got it.
reply
0 ups
No. If it's part of your job (military or police, when it's necessary) or you're shooting in self defense or to protect someone then you aren't breaking the law therefore you are not a criminal.
reply
1 up
reply
0 ups
reply
1 up
In your face liberals!
reply
0 ups
HA!!
reply
1 up
SO TRUE!! TAKE MY UPVOTE!!!
reply
0 ups
Funny man
reply
0 ups
Lol
reply
4 ups, 10 replies
reply
11 ups, 1 reply
It's not the law abiding citizens doing the mass shootings, it's criminals with no regard to the law. Your meme validates the "gun free zone" argument. Criminals target places where armed civilians are absent. You'll never see a mass shooting at a gun show or anywhere else law abiding citizens are armed.. only where helpless unarmed victims are. Answer your question?
reply
[deleted]
2 ups, 1 reply
Many of the guns used in mass shootings are legal. The person was law abiding when they bought them. The fact is the laws are too loose.
reply
3 ups, 2 replies
That isn't even relevant. Legal or illegal the shootings still occured. And the shootings occur in gun free zones. You know, the areas where it's illegal for anyone to carry a gun.
reply
[deleted]
2 ups, 1 reply
Right, so make it tougher to get guns.

Good talk.
reply
5 ups, 2 replies
And you actually think making it tougher for law abiding citizens to get guns will end the mass shootings? It isn't the law abiding that are doing the shootings. It isn't tough for criminals to get guns, just as it isn't tough for drug addicts to get drugs.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
It isn't tough for criminals to get guns even when guns become outlawed. And it doesn't matter if you outlaw something or not, violent people will still find ways to commit mass violence.
reply
[deleted]
2 ups, 2 replies
Yes I do. Because all the guns start legal. The FIRST criminals in this situation are the people who sell or "lose" guns that somehow end up in the hands of people that kill other people.

That needs to stop first.

Mass violence may exist with no guns...but guns are the most effective way to kill the most people fastest.
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
Not really. Look at mass violence in Europe and other places they outlaw guns.
reply
[deleted]
2 ups
Right....not nearly as high as levels we have here....I know, crazy right?
reply
0 ups
No, that would be bombs
reply
2 ups, 2 replies
In most of Europe guns are hard to obtain. Not impossible mind you. But not easy to come by. There are almost no gun killings. Arming all Americans is an American ideal. We all think we are Jesse James. And America is the old west. The old addage those who live by the sword dies by the sword. Holds true to today....oh I have 6 dogs and nobody F's with me.
reply
3 ups
Yes, and your country's people are being heavily suppressed by an overbearing government taking control of your lives. I suppose if you enjoy living that way... however I don't and believe my government has no right to control me in such.
reply
0 ups
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Tbh, I just think it's too late for America to ban guns. It's only logical that putting a gun together requires materials, it's not like any criminal is going to have one handy should they have been legislation restricted aeons ago. Context matters a lot. "Ban" guns, and le's imagine that, thoroughly, guns disappear : there might be a rise in knife crime or... Bow and arrow, or wtvr, however, sure - the dangerous tools are kept away. It's a nice way of thinking, the "if we all have guns, no one shoots", but every now and then... The wrong person gets the gun.
reply
0 ups
reply
9 ups, 1 reply
Because of reckless liberalism that blames guns and not criminals.. therefore creating "gun free zones" that are an invitation to criminals. Why? The armed civilians obey the law and criminals do not.. therefore were not armed to intervene.

Criminals choose soft targets to enhance their chances of success. Facilities with gun bans assist them in their criminal endeavors.

Ever see a bank with a sign outside that says "security free - alarm free bank zone"?

There's a reason for that.. yet liberalism believes a "gun free" zone will save lives. It hasn't worked.. won't work.. criminals by definition do not obey rules or laws.
reply
[deleted]
4 ups, 1 reply
I about pee'd m'self when I read this "security free - alarm free bank zone"...that would be awesome, I'd feel real safe banking there.

That also brought to mind the Jon Dillinger quote..."Why do you rob banks?" "Because that's where the money is!"
reply
7 ups
How to explain these things to uninformed,... is challenging! I need crayons!
reply
6 ups
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/10/03/do-civilians-with-guns-ever-stop-mass-shootings/
reply
4 ups, 3 replies
How can you say zero were prevented? Im sure there'd be way more than 33 if no one had guns lol
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
'Never let a tragedy go to waste', remember?
reply
[deleted]
1 up
I think that the quote is crisis, not tragedy, but close enough...attributed to the shining, happy mayor of Chi town, Rom Emmanuel.
reply
1 up
http://controversialtimes.com/issues/constitutional-rights/12-times-mass-shootings-were-stopped-by-good-guys-with-guns/
reply
0 ups
As a pro-gun control liberal, I agree.
reply
[deleted]
2 ups
First, I know of one, New Life Church in Colorado Springs, gunman taken down by an armed female.

Second, most mass shootings happen in those aforementioned "gun free zones", you know, those places that law abiding armed citizens either don't go to or leave their weapons at home or in their vehicles. Criminals, on the other hand, somehow don't give to shits if it's a gun free zone and prefer to commit their heinous acts in gun free zones for the very reason that there will not be armed resistance until it is too late.
reply
[deleted]
1 up
It's not actually possible to say that zero mass shootings were prevented.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Shootings. If you're going to make a sarcastic comment that belies the point you're aiming to make, spelling words correctly would be a great place to start for minimal credibility.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
reply
1 up
reply
1 up
You can't fix the evil in peoples' hearts, so you can't prevent these shootings from ever happening in the first place. But armed citizens HAVE slowed down or stopped "active shooters." EVERY time an active shooter has encountered any kind of resistance, they surrender or commit suicide. EVERY place you see the horrific death tolls, it was a "gun-free" zone.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Sorry past 33 YEARS
reply
5 ups, 1 reply
Are you familiar with mexico? Civilians dont have guns, but cartels and corrupt police do. One of the most violent countries in the world. Armed civs is rarely a bad thing
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
Venezuela has the highest murder per captial rate in the world. Yet has gun control laws.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Actually per capita it's Honduras with the highest murder rate
reply
1 up
El Savadora now according to CNN yesterday.
reply
0 ups
Now Mexican cartels can make more money by selling guns and drugs.
reply
0 ups
reply
0 ups
Gun laws actually reduce deaths from guns and can lower homicide rates. It happened in Australia.
Flip Settings
Bad Luck Brian memeRe-caption this meme

Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator

Show embed codes
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
HAPPY ABOUT NEW GUN LAW GETS SHOT BECAUSE CRIMINALS DON'T CARE ABOUT THE NEW GUN LAW
hotkeys: D = random, W = like, S = dislike, A = back