Cecil and the liberals

Im just going to point out that it isnt an accident if two people have sex. Im also going to say that they are alive. i'm also going to say they were humans, ie, more important than a lion. Even if it was wrong to kill him, an outrage like this should have been directed towards the illegal activities of PP.

Sex is there to *gasp* reproduce. Shocker I know. So therefore, when you do something which is designed to do something, why would it be an accident if that thing actually happened? And yes, as soon as they are formed in the womb, they are living humans. Besides, it may be the woman's body, but that baby isnt that woman, that baby is that baby. and that baby's body is that baby's body. Think of abortion as pulling the plug on the life support system of a person dependent on a life support system, because its basically the same thing.

If sex is to reproduce then why do we have condoms or abortion, if it was solely to reproduce then these things wouldn't exist. If abortion is similar to pulling the plug on a life support system then so is taking antibiotics, they don't have a choice, they just want to find a place to reproduce/multiply but no, we selfish humans kill them. Also they're not human, a human is a man, woman, or child of the species Homo sapiens, distinguished from other animals by superior mental development, power of articulate speech, and upright stance.

1, because humans want to have sex for nothing but pleasure, and have such created those things. 2, one is a human, the other is a bacteria. honestly that was just a pathetic comparison. 3, they are still humans. i'm not sure what you're getting at, they are just humans before they were born... does this mean that babies who cant walk or talk arent humans and we can murder them freely?

1."Sex is there to *gasp* reproduce. Shocking i know*.
2. One is not human but just cells, bacteria is cells. Just one won't be a human in the future and one could be.
3. No, they are humans once they are born. Since murder is the deliberate killing of another human it's not murder until they are born.

1. I have no clue what you're on about here...
2. It is a group of cells almost immediately after conception... a few days later it's millions of cells, and in a month its billions. so by the time you know you're pregnant (usually) its already more than "just cells". And again, you're basically comparing premature human life as just a bacteria. And both will be a human in the future, only people like you seem to see fit to murder them before its obvious they are humans. if they aren't, why is PP selling baby part illegally? whats the point of having the arm or leg of something that isnt anything but a bunch of cells? how does nothing but a bunch of cells even HAVE an arm or a leg? and you, my friend, are also made up of cells, so just because you have more cells means you're alive? doesn't that make single-celled bacteria not alive and we can "murder" them freely?
3. Murder is the deliberate killing of another human. Its the premature offspring of a human. thats like if you're in mid-construction of a car, you stop and destroy it because it isn't a fully built car yet... all it needs is a little more time and it WILL be a car...

In my opinion, the woman should abort a child after a heart is formed and beating. There's still women abortion their unborn baby at 5 months, no joke. I've read that on an abortion website. I'm glad healthcare in schools are getting better. lol There's more protection out there than just birth control pills if a woman or couple isn't ready for a baby.

Did you mean SHOULDN'T abort a child after the heart is formed? Anyway i think it's the exact same thing if you abort a baby after a week as it is a few months, after all it's dead either way and doesn't really get anything better both ways.

Don't talk shit about my brother

No, my brother is a brain dead baby. I don't know this turdferno guy either.

I meant shouldn't, but women does it anyway.