Stem Cell Research Moral Issues

Stem Cell Research Moral Issues | SO LET ME GET THIS STRAIGHT: IN YOUR COUNTRY IT IS PERFECTLY LEGAL FOR A PREGNANT WOMAN TO KILL HER UNBORN CHILD. BUT IT'S ILLEGAL FOR SCIEN | image tagged in memes,third world skeptical kid,politics,political | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
29,432 views, 188 upvotes, Made by anonymous 43 months ago memesthird world skeptical kidpoliticspolitical
Third World Skeptical Kid memeRe-caption this meme
Add Meme
Post Comment
reply
17 ups
Success Kid Meme | MOM TRIED TO ABORT ME MADE IT OUT ALIVE | image tagged in memes,success kid | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
16 ups, 1 reply
. | image tagged in this is advanced stupid | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
[deleted]
4 ups
Black Girl Wat Meme | WTF IS YOUCHEW IT DOESN'T SOUNDS GOOD | image tagged in memes,black girl wat | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
[deleted]
11 ups, 1 reply
We call it american stupid
reply
0 ups
Trust me. Murica is f**ked up but not as much as you think. It is nothing compared to... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGU_BrRlvB8
reply
10 ups
We don't really want to discuss why this is... but you'll notice that both sides of that coin involve keeping population down.
reply
8 ups, 1 reply
It's interesting to think of how many potential doctors, scientists, and future global leaders who could have significantly impacted the world had their lives cut short by abortions.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
That's true, but there were also people with the great potential go evil.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
In America, we have a policy of innocent until proven guilty.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
I didn't say they were evil, I just said that they had just as much potential to be evil as they did to be good.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
I know, but in America, we always assume that the accused is generally innocent. I'm sure that sometimes they would be evil, but we have ways of dealing with them.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Okay, but we also don't assume that they're 'guilty' of being a great human being.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Actually, we assume they'll be standard contributors to society. If they go on ahead and create the next advancements on the human lifestyle, good for them. If they become petty crooks or even murders and terrorists, shame on them, they'll be dealt with. It isn't fair to get robbed of a life, a precious life, a shot to become an influence on people, fall in love, have their own families, and in turn die, looking back at the whole way there. No one has the right to deny anyone at least a chance.
reply
0 ups, 2 replies
The question then becomes when we count them as a person. For me, that's 26 weeks. For others, it's when they're born. It's 8 weeks for a different set of people and conception for another group.
reply
2 ups, 2 replies
Life is commonly considered to begin hours after conception, as the cells begin to reproduce. I think that's pretty lively, if the cells are already making cells themselves.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
In reply to your comment below; So do unfertilized eggs and unfertilizing sperm. That doesn't mean we must use all of them.
1 up
There's nothing anyone can do to protect "rights" of sperm/egg cells, but once they're fertilized (or in the case of sperm, fertilizing), then the growth and life of that cell as a human being is guaranteed, apart from the tragic but natural case of miscarriage.
reply
0 ups, 2 replies
Yes, but so can plants, and nobody cares about them because they don't do much.
1 up
*Facepalm* I didn't realize plants had the potential to grow into human beings...
[deleted]
0 ups
You think plants don’t do much? You mean you missed science in 3rd grade where you learned plants take carbon dioxide and change it to oxygen so we can breathe?
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Why do you say 26 weeks? Because it can then hear and respond to its outside environment?
reply
0 ups
Basically, yeah.
reply
5 ups
Both are horrific and evil, hence, I'm consistently against both.
reply
5 ups
reply
5 ups
I ask this question everyday it makes no sense
reply
4 ups
[deleted]
reply
[deleted]
4 ups, 1 reply
reply
[deleted]
6 ups, 1 reply
I thought you said rice krispies lol
reply
[deleted]
7 ups
Dude try eating them with chop sticks. It's fun.
reply
2 ups
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
Religion and politics were supposed to be separate entities. The issue over whether stem cell research is morally acceptable stems from religious concerns that we are "playing god" in doing so. The ban on such research indicates that our government is still largely controlled be religion. Despite our best efforts to avert it. Religion is a poison to which science is an antidote.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Riiiiiight... you keep telling yourself that.
reply
[deleted]
0 ups
Yeah I agree with you hiyaguy.
reply
[deleted]
2 ups, 2 replies
reply
0 ups
reply
[deleted]
0 ups
reply
[deleted]
2 ups
This meme is so true
reply
3 ups, 2 replies
34 likes, top of Page 1,
1,284 views... and no downvotes... yet
reply
8 ups, 1 reply
reply
1 up
I'm 2chanz truu
reply
7 ups, 1 reply
reply
4 ups
reply
1 up
You're pretty smart, little black kid.
reply
0 ups
How about neither? (Adult stem cell research is fine though I think).
reply
0 ups
it seems I've stumbled into a complicated meme, too bad my will to argue has left me....
reply
[deleted]
0 ups
And get this:
The people that are AGAINST abortion are usually the same ones AGAINST stem cell use!

AAAAAAND- they are usually the same ones AGAINST welfare and food stamps to take care of the child when it's born!
reply
[deleted]
1 up, 1 reply
reply
1 up
wtf did i cause
reply
2 ups
Yes, pretty much.
reply
[deleted]
5 ups
Aboriton may be, but why we don't use them for research?
Its an waste of stem cells.
reply
0 ups
Yeah, I really don't understand why people have a problem with it. I think it should be available as an option to women who don't want to keep the child. It should be their choice. If someone doesn't agree with them, then they don't have to get one, but if they do, they should have the option.
reply
4 ups, 5 replies
Oh, so it's perfectly fine to burn an unborn child with solvents or rip it apart with steel instruments?
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
I'm just distracted by the fat that a comment by the infamous IceCube isn't a "low-rated comment..."
reply
3 ups
Just wait...
reply
1 up
oh so its alright to pull a child from its mother's va**na with a vaccum cleaner therefore taking its chance of living? thats how i see it lol.
reply
0 ups
I think that, it should normally be illegal, and you shouldn't abort the baby just because you made a dumb decision. You were stupid and irresponsible enough to go off and have sex without thinking that, oh, maybe nature might come into play? Then you face the consequences.
However, if within a month the parents are proven to not be responsible enough or have the resources to care for the child, it should be taken away. No child should suffer because some irresponsible people can't clean up the mess they created.

In a few cases, though, I do believe it's right. They are:
If the mother was **ped,
if the child is under fifteen,
or if the baby has a disorder severe enough to make life extremely painful.

Still, in all these cases, the abortion must take place within the first trimester, otherwise it's illegal. If you have had sex or been **ped, it should be fairly easy to tell if you're pregnant. There is no reason why you can't take a test.

I believe that irresponsible people should have to deal with the consequences of their mistakes, but children also should not have to suffer.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
also that comment didn't come out right i forgot to add abortion is* a right
reply
5 ups
Murder is not a right or privilege.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
I'm seriously ashamed of people like you who don't have any sort of value for life.
reply
0 ups
I can't even believe what people are saying in these comments.
reply
5 ups, 1 reply
Ever heard of adoption? And I'm sorry, but brutally murdering a child that has no hand in his circumstances is just as deplorable.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
you're narrow mindedness amuses me glad we don't have idiot's like you in office
reply
4 ups, 3 replies
And your callousness and blatant disregard for morality is appalling. Are you even aware that a fetus can feel pain and has a functioning nervous system at eight weeks? Or have you even seen photos of the aftermath of most abortions?
reply
2 ups
That's why it's illegal after that time, but before then, what's the problem? The fetus isn't even fully alive at that point...
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
It develops a nervous system at 26 weeks, actually. Until then, it's basically a plant, but after then...
reply
4 ups, 3 replies
Incorrect. It has basic autonomic functions at eight to twelve weeks and can in fact, feel pain.
reply
4 ups
It is alive hours after conception by biological definition of life, as soon as those cells start reproducing. By the definition of species the individual offspring of homos sapiens and homos sapiens can only be homos sapiens.
reply
4 ups
It is alive hours after conception by biological definition of life, as soon as those cells start reproducing. By the definition of species the individual offspring of homos sapiens and homos sapiens can only be homos sapiens.
reply
1 up, 4 replies
So? It only gets its thalamus at week 26. Before then it is unable to relay pain signals.
2 ups
TLZF97 - please do this thing called research. It would greatly help us all.
0 ups
@ upvote fairy ~ probably because plants are "actual living being that can't feel pain".
2 ups
Wrong again. The thalamus is developed around week eight. And even then, complete removal of the cerebral cortex does not eliminate the sensation of pain.
0 ups
its amazing how you went from treating the fetus as a plant to treating it as an actual living being that cant feel pain.
reply
3 ups, 2 replies
Or that Margaret Sanger was a Nazi sympathizer and racist who supported eliminating the black race through means of eugenics and abortion? Makes sense seeing that over 35% of abortions are of African American children.
reply
1 up
And what about the other 65%? That's a meaningless statistic.
reply
3 ups, 2 replies
Ummm... women that get **ped don't want the child and they get rid of it. I'm sure if you were a woman you wouldn't want to carry around a rapist's baby for nine months. You probably would be supporting abortion if you were a woman.
reply
3 ups, 5 replies
There are a lot of women who had to go through **pe and either adopted the child or decided to care for it. Do you really think that the infant should have to die because over something that it had no control over? And there are literally thousands of families on adoption waiting lists in this country.
2 ups
hey, i know, let's argue about
3 ups
Sorry. *put the child up for adoption. Didn't see that error.
1 up
i support your logic. i know at least 3 families in my town wanting to adopt and i know of 2 girls that aborted their children instead of giving the child to the families who are WILLING to pay for the hospital visit after birth.
3 ups
You're forgetting she has to birth the baby to even put it up for adoption. Ok, so say abortion is Illegal, and this virgin woman got **ped. She has to have her va**na wrecked twice-over because of something she couldn't stop or control. Glad you want that to happen!
2 ups
That baby wasn't meant to happen. One day, if you magically turn into a woman and get **ped and pregnant, I guarantee you'll change your mind.
reply
2 ups
Right, because men were never born. We just spawned, amirite?
*nods*
Flip Settings
Third World Skeptical Kid memeRe-caption this meme

Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator

Show embed codes
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
SO LET ME GET THIS STRAIGHT: IN YOUR COUNTRY IT IS PERFECTLY LEGAL FOR A PREGNANT WOMAN TO KILL HER UNBORN CHILD. BUT IT'S ILLEGAL FOR SCIEN
hotkeys: D = random, W = like, S = dislike, A = back
Feedback