We already knew Wikipedia is officially run by Communists. It's insane that AI's use the site in their responses

"The Party for Socialism and Liberation". Liberation from what? Freedom? They want to liberate us from being able to determine best how to live our own lives? There is certainly no liberty in socialism.

Perhaps you're the ones spreading propaganda. Look in the mirror before criticizing a source

I'm joking about the intense polishing of a turd...
But now we're at it - what is propaganda exactly? is there ever a political meme that isn't propaganda?

So... you think that's why everyone voted for him? Because someone changed something on wikipedia?

Do you think that doesn't happen on a daily basis for any of those pages?

Do you think that doesn't happen for GOP candidates?

Why everyone voted? No absolutely not. What Dems do great though, is the sheer comprehensiveness of corruption - you have the low-wage labor hungry industry, Schumer's proud 235 2024-inserted judges, the EU especially, and basically every institution in your grasp. Trump has literally started from scratch in order to get to make just standard Conservative policy.
What I have learned by studying the freaky American alternate universe, is your step by step journey into complete madness exactly on the loss in 2024.
Seeing every problematic element of woke finally do its long awaited insurrection job in 2025 has been one hell of a show... and lesson in many ways. Fun fact - I became kinda obsessed with the U.S bc I wanted to be prepared when the woke logic comes to my country years later, as is tradition with things generally.

It astonishes me every time how you can speak so plainly to a Dem and they distort everything you say.

I never associated a change to Wikipedia with a change to the voting outcome. Only a Dem can think of stuff that crazy. Maybe they do think that will change an election. They sure have a long history of trying to make Wikipedia and everywhere else online only say what they want everyone to think.

You should spend some more time in studying the US system because Schumer can't insert a single judge into the process.

Only 1 person gets to nominate a judge. That's the President. The Senate confirms that judge. By tradition, not law, the senators from the home state of that judge can sign off or deny it. They both have to agree for that candidate to move forward to the judicial subcommittee. Once they pass the subcommittee they go to the floor vote.

Schumer, being in the Minority, can't do shit about it. He's got 1 vote, which can be overrulled by the majority members in both the committee and the floor. The committee leader is appointed by the majority leader... which is a Republican.

Whatever he's talking about here, is what I mean:
imgflip.com/gif/aj2ky9

How did he "start from scratch" when he had the entire policy agenda quite literally printed out in a guidebook for him?

Whatever. Because every person in the system from top to bottom, except from one supreme court justice, was made for Democrat power only. Also why Republican voters' dissatisfaction with Bush was behind a good portion of the MAGA sentiment, plus they hate Thune for not passing the Save Act, though they hated him before that.
Loyalty to Democrats and their/EU Liberal Order is the only way, set up by people who've held power for decades, while regular Republican politicians care little about anything, so that's easy.
Working with Democrats stopped being just "another voice", but a direct insurrection from day one. Acting the way they all immediately did when he won was pretty much a giveaway about that tragic future.
If Dems were still the pre 2015 Fetterman Liberal, they'd agree with 80% of Trump's policies like Hillary did - her supporters couldn't distinguish between their written speeches back then, it was absolutely fascinating to witness, and it was even an official test, not one of those street interviews