Third World Skeptical Kid

Oh. F you. 100% Yes Thought I'd share the same friendly greeting that you like to use with me. BTW, your meme really lacks any kind of intellectual impact.

No. Isn't it weird that Trump is supposed to be a god who knows everything when he is only a man?
It sounds weird that everything he says is always right and everything the left says is wrong.

Heck, if everything is going to be "fake news" then right wing outlets might as well as be fake news too.

Democrats are the only people calling him god and seeing him dressed as the pope and calling him Jesus. That is weird isn't it? Democrats are the ones protesting the enforcement of immigration laws passed by Democrats in Congress. That is weird isn't it? Democrats are the ones saying the Republicans are robots saying Trump has done nothing wrong, there is a lot of Republican criticism when it's needed, but it's generally constructive, not BLOW UP FING DC NOW!!! over reactionary loser screams of terror. That is weird isn't it?
Simple, and serious , question, fair enough. Do you agree that there is fake news? Not discussing sources (I have my opinions, but that isn't the issue now, I'd seriously would like to know what you think with out ad hominem attacks).

As a conservative with conservative friends and family- no conservative I know thinks or acts like you say we do. You are free to stay atheist, we aren't a muslim nation yet, but when that happens, you don't get a choice

I think this is just a matter of whether the us population is mature enough to accept facts.

Ex: immigration, war in iran, environment,

Maturity is in short supply. We have immigration laws, do we stop enforcement, or do we follow due process and repeal those laws? The war in Iran, don't know how old you are, but I thought I was going to be drafted when Jimmy Carter's hostage rescue failed- we all thought it was WW3. I've watched 47 years of Iranian Islamist terrorist threats and destruction intensifying every year. I've attended funerals of some of their victims. They showed us their hypersonic missiles. They defied Obama's treaty and told us they had enough enriched uranium (a very complex process) for 11 bombs and they said they were going to wipe Israel, most of Europe and the US off the map to bring in the 12th Imam. Seriously. Yeah, you better believe war in Iran, but admit, our fatalities are less than a typical 2 weeks in Chicago. We do not have boots on the ground, and unlike the endless wars of the Military Industrial complex, Johnson, Clinton, Bush, Bush Cheney Rumsfeld and Obama, We didn't just poke around with a stick and use rules of engagement that prohibited firing back when fired upon. I had a friend in Vietnam who was in command of a forward air base. They were being over run by VC, when he radioed for permission to fight back, it was denied- even though they heard the intense explosions and small arms fire in the background. He respectfully submitted his request again, denied, then he kicked in the radio and ordered his men to fight for their lives. After a 6 hour fire fight, all his men survived with few injuries. He was court martialed, the MI complex thrives on dead soldiers. Environment? You're talking to a guy who was at the first Earthday, who worked in the oil and gas industry and directed a career long record of 100% environmental regulatory compliance, no violations (and no lost time injuries- separate category). My philosophy was compliance is easy, correction is hard. I didn't tolerate half assed view on any regulations. Now do you see consistency in my statement about immigration laws? If it's the law, we are expected to comply. If the law (or regulation) is wrong, we have a robust system to correct, adjust or abolish it. The system works if you don't have a bunch of revolutionaries trying to destroy it with riots in the streets. Rene Good and Alex Pretti would still be alive, just like those of us who worked through the system to make positive changes in R and D administrations. Just how centrist are you? Really now.

We lost the war.

I'm progressive when America has the money for it. That's why I'm centrist. I want this country to implement new solutions, but only when it has the money to do so.

I'm only conservative when it comes to war and allies.

Fair enough. Put out your ideas for new solutions to implement to public discussion. Don't get butt hurt by criticism, take it to heart, test the criticism against your ideas, test your theories (that's the scientific method). By doing so you sharpen your mind, your ideas get stronger, criticism helps to work the bugs out before they undo your plans, you harvest the best ideas and integrate them into your plan. When you've refined yourself, your ability to see an even bigger picture, and your ideas, then you are in a position to make real meaningful and beneficial changes. Before I hit 30 I was asked to fill a vacancy on my small town city council. Our US system of government was designed to be dispersed, localized. Every citizen could easily make their voice heard and shape their community for the common good. I realized then that local government works, but when you have to fly 3000 miles to talk to your Representative or Senator, it breaks down and corruption rises. I got to see how the sausage was made in local government and I shut down some major BS from the old guard. I was able to stop wasteful spending that only made problems worse and clean up problems with less taxpayer dollars. As a smartass young punk, I could make a huge difference making my community better for all, not just people who agreed with me. When the people are involved our system works. There are 4 branches of our government, The Executive, the Judicial, the Legislative and the Citizens. Well before my time, citizens either got pushed out or ignored their duty. The garbage you see today is due to the 4th branch, us.
You are intelligent. You can make a real and meaningful difference right where you are right now. Too young for a couple years? You can still comment at public meetings. Learn the rules, play by them, be respectful, self educate on every facet of what matters to you, go with where the truth takes you regardless of your initial presuppositions. That is how the system works. You can make it better.

Film evidence of the 21st Century liberal mind. Vapid.

You like it or not?

No, I don't. In the past my liberal friends were logical. We could agree on problems and differ on solutions, and get this we worked together to craft the best solutions we could. Try this, put up a meme on Politics Too that says, Trump says the sky is blue!! and see what kind of reaction you get. How can solutions be worked out in a situation like that? Unlike liberals of the past, the liberals I encounter now are 100% irrational and emotional. Try this, present scientific evidence that manmade climate change is not supported by any field of science. I did it showing geologic evidence, gas laws of physics evidence, biological evidence, chemistry based evidence, Meteorological evidence, atmospheric physics evidence. Guess what it got me. I was banned from facebook before I even applied, people opened Twitter accounts in with the user name "**** (my name) IsInDeepShit" You would not believe the death threats and attacks I got, some even physical at conferences I presented at. And guess what, not one rational refutation of the science, only personal attacks and career destruction. Want to know why the science is settled? If you disagree with the settled science of the Enviromental Industrial Complex you will be destroyed. I spent the last 4 years of my working life driving a truck over the road because my career was destroyed. The harm is real, and it's not based on the truth, but on power, manipulation and money.

I wasn't talking to you. And say, the liberals you see today are 100% irrational. Well so are you conservatives.

Besides, this politics server is just as bad. Whenever I post something anti Trump, immediately, people like you are butchering me. It's all the same. And no. I'll say it nicely believing you are a good person: Your claim that there is no evidence that man made climate change is wrong.

Here's a simple example: Gas cars make CO2, which turns into pollution. And who exactly made gas cars since the 1900s? Humans

So there you have it. That there is an example on how pollution is man made. I can give you more.

And no, I am sure that at least one person tried to refute your argument, instead of cancelling you and death threating you.

A lot of people have used swears at me and slammed me with their words on this server, but I don't just that doesn't mean I was just insulted. People at least tried refuting my arguments.

Think about your anti-Trump memes. Are they true, I mean really true. Yes Trump is in the Epstein files 38,000 times, but have you personally read those 38,000 times? Almost all of them are people mentioning Trump as an adversary. Epstein hated Trump. Trump turned Epstein in for soliciting an underage employee at Mara Lago, and ran him out as soon as it was reported. If those 38,000 times Trump was mentioned would implicate him do you think the Biden or Obama Administrations wouldn't have taken him out? There's a danger in looking at raw investigation files. Prosecutors have to build a case on real, verifiable facts, not heresay. Before you think that isn't right, remember those same protections are in place for you and me. We are all protected from having to defend ourselves against the unlimited bank account of government bringing unprovable charges.
CO2 is not a pollutant. Every breath you breathe is recycled by plants. When there is more CO2, there are more plants, that's just science. CO2 is not uniformly distributed in the atmosphere, it is concentrated downwind of rainforests where massive amounts of vegetative material are decomposing, NASA satellite images show that. Learn what turbulent gases do compared to laminar. Our atmosphere is turbulent. CO2 is a heavy molecule, and guess where CO2 is most concentrated, research shows it is not in the stratosphere reflecting heat back to earth, it's within 1500 feet of the surface of earth- right where plants need it. And as far as reflectance goes, there are gas Laws of Physics that disprove so much of climate theory (difference between a theory and and a law- look it up if you don't already understand that). If a substance reflects heat back to earth, it is also reflecting an equal amount of heat back to space, it's called equilibrium- proven science. Want to really understand it? I'd say draw a 10,000 dot grid, you can do it online. 10,000 is 1% of 1 million, right? it's a scale model. Climate scientists say CO2 is at 400 ppm. 1% of 400 is 4, right? Climate scientists say humans have added 50 destructive ppm to the atmosphere, so again, 1% of 50 is .5. On our scale model that's one half a dot.Now color 3 and 1/2 dots life giving green and 1/2 a dot red to represent the deadly addition. Now think about how that 1/2 dot overrides every other molecule of colorless, transparent, non-reflective gas in the atmosphere. That's just science. Randomly distribute them, concentrate them. They can't do the damage.