ALLAH IS SATAN

Another reason to exterminate the religion

One is not like the others-
Hebrews/Jews - Abraham almost sacrificed Isaac.
Christians - Ditto.
Islam - Abraham almost sacrificed Ishmael.

The Torah and Bible(which includes the Torah translated to a country's spoken language along with the New Testament) are very clear on the matter - God CALLS IT A SIN when people change Scripture like that whether it be written or spoken.

Exactly, hence why Pauline Christianity is anti-christ, and the Church is the Beast, seated in Rome.

Bet you loved him when he was Saul and murdering Christians up and down the region.

That's the same guy, fella, the one you chose to worship instead of following Jesus and the Jews that followed him.

"Graeystone

Here's a difference, if not the main difference-
A firm believer in Jesus Christ will stand up to such evil even if it kills them because they have the faith that no matter what Jesus will be there to welcome them home.

A firm believer in Leftism won't stand up to such evil even if it kills them because their belief in the afterlife tends to be the nothingness of atheism."

A firm believer in Jesus or anything will stand up to such evil because standing up to it is the right thing to do, regardless of the cost to yourself. That's why you fear (true) Leftists. The ones who would put themselves on the line for a cause, while you seek comfort in plastic cross trinkets and a cookie at the end of the tunnel to munch on for an eternity.

That's a hypothalamus generated mindset, the basic one we're born with, to do what you do in exchange for reward.

Next level when reaching towards maturity is to do something because it is the law.

Final level for those who develop that far is to do what they do because it is right, and take responsibility for themselves and make amends if possible should what they do turns out to be wrong.

You need faith to fool yourself into believing fairy tales that you really don't believe in anyways, as witnessed by the way you live and how you treat others in contrast to what you claim to preach.

Belief is irrelevant. Faith is irrelevant. If there is a Divinity, it simply is. It does not depend on how many likes it gets on Facebook to determine whether or not it exists. Anyone who claims to be of a faith, is not.

You don't need to accept air to breathe it, you don't need to believe in it to not suffocate. Air is air regardless what the puny humans think they think about it, let alone think they can give it permission to be reality. You think God needs your permission to be. That's because you want to lord over God. You're so-called understanding of God is to equate it with a treat if you're a nice lad.

God does not depend on humanity for anything. Christianity doesn't believe God does either. Christianity is about God making a way for imperfect humans to exist with a perfect God. I dare you to read the Bible and ask God to reveal its truth to you.

Why would a god need a religion that forces it's followers to worship him in order for him to flick his fingers and fix the flaws he made in his beasts?

Christianity is about making people exist as Romans.

God didn't make humans flawed. He doesn't need to force anyone to worship him, and if he flicked his fingers and "fixed" us, we'd all turn into robots with no free will. Christianity is about reconciliation with God

Pound for pound the weakest creature to have ever existed. Can't even drink from a stream without risking disease. A clean stream, no less. In the mountains. Turn the temperature down 10°, they start dying like crazy, while mammals and birds from the tropics can withstand winter temperatures if need be without fire and clothing.

Christianity is about loyalty to Rome. That's why Christians are so easy given to secular lives, because the religion basically is secular, in effect godless. Go to Mass on Sundays, do your Hail Marys, and it's back to the usual sinning for the rest of the week because Jesus forgives................ all those who own fan club memberships.

We weren't always weak like we are now. In the past (according to the bible) we were capable of great feats and lived hundreds of years. There's zero things in the Bible about loyalty to Rome. You are thinking of the Catholic Church when they split off from biblical Christianity shortly after Constantine. Right around the time they declared that if you aren't part of the Catholic Church you aren't saved and when they started praying to Mary (aka talking to the dead like witches).

Correct, millions of years ago, the ancestors of humans were just as strong as any other ape today, because that's what they were.

They did not live to be hundreds of years old in the Levant though, that's just fairy tales for cavemen.

The New Testament is a Roman book. Even the Lord's Prayer, "give us our daily bread," is an ode to Rome.

Who is worshipping Paul?

One guess.
I know you got this one. I have faith in you.

Never happened bro. You probably need to go back and read it again. The entire Christian new testament is about Jesus fulfilling the law and writing it on people's hearts.

Pretty sure Christianity happened. Let me look out my window to make sure,,,

Nope. You still don't know what Christianity is. You need to do more reading of the bible.

Yeah guess I missed that line that Jesus wrote on people's hearts.

How was Temple this week on the Shabbat, by the way?

Christians don't consider the law null and void. The law gets written on our hearts. The law being the ten commandments. The rest of those rules were specifically for Israel and part of their covenant (contract) with God. As long as they follow them they will prosper, if they stop they will be slaughtered and enslaved. Most of the laws are good to follow. The only ones we don't follow are the sin sacrifice laws because Jesus fulfilled the sin sacrifice for everyone. Temple is church as we no longer need the high priest because the holy spirit and Jesus are the high priests for the gentiles.

"Correct, millions of years ago, the ancestors of humans were just as strong as any other ape today, because that's what they were."

No. Even what evolutionists consider "early humans" as in the first people groups that were considered human were much more healthy and lived much longer natural lives (as opposed to those that died from unnatural death).

"They did not live to be hundreds of years old in the Levant though, that's just fairy tales for cavemen."

Actually with the higher oxygen and air pressure in prehistoric times humans lived much longer. Scientists know this because of brow ridges that never stop growing.

"The New Testament is a Roman book. Even the Lord's Prayer, "give us our daily bread," is an ode to Rome"

No. Daily bread is referring to the minimal meal to stay alive. Bread back then was not processed and was full of nutrients, enough to keep you alive for a day if you ate one of the loads they made.

The new Testament was written in Roman times in Rome by roman scribes, so of course there were Roman affectations, but nothing that changes the core messages.

The ancestors of humans did not live longer lives. Most didn't make it to their first birthdays. Those who did survive their first year we would consider old by middle age, if they made it that far.

There was no higher oxygen and air pressure back then (prehistoric humans is what we're talking about, not dinosaurs), and they did not live longer at all... shorter in general, with a few exceptions making it almost as far as some people today.

Human brow ridges, like any other mammal bones, do stop growing.

Every household in the Roman Empire was allowed a free loaf of bread per day. "Give us our daily bread" was a reference to that.

The core message was totally altered and corrupted, from originally a Jewish one, to one that's clearly not Jewish, especially after Paul. That's why Christianity is not Judaism, nor follows any of its tenets.

I'm not talking about unnatural death. I'm talking natural lifespan. There's evidence oxygen and air pressure was much higher in prehistoric times.

The daily bread thing was a reference to when Jesus said "man cannot live in bread alone but every word from God" it is talking about knowledge.

The message is the same. Love thy neighbor as yourself, don't sin (murder, steal, etc...etc...) the only difference is Christianity acknowledges that the messiah has returned, where Judaism is still waiting.

Yeah, doing the Cambrian Period, 300 million years ago, waaaaaaaay before mammals even evolved, let alone humans.

Give us our daily bread means give us our daily bread. It's not referring to some pseudo-philosophical religious viewpoint for people who thought stoning to death was an appropriate punishment for those using the crapper on the Sabbath.

Message the same with all religions.

Christianity does not acknowledge that a messiah has returned in Jesus (whatever that means. You mean Cyrus the Great is coming back?) because Jesus was not a messiah nor ever did anything remotely messianic.

Christians have been waiting nearly two millennia for Jesus come back... before his own generation came to pass. Perhaps oxygen levels are still very high and there are 2000 year old Peter, Paul, and Mary, etc, waiting in them thar hills, but, naah,,,