Selective Outrage.

Listen

I may have bias for having a trans so

There's quite difference between someone between trans and a killer

If someone happens to be both, the killer part is bad its like this image

Wh, it's mental illness, more likely to do crazy things. There's a correlation there.

Sir, respectfully, no it aint

And I would appreciate that you understand its not a mental illness and that is the same thing people used to say about gay people, despite the fact It wasnt

I apologize for the egregious grammar mistakes

Actual facts here: https://www.factcheck.org/2025/09/few-mass-shooters-have-been-transgender/

5 mass shootings by trans people out of 5,748 mass shootings.

This is the most selective outrage yet. Less than .1% of mass shootings (or shootings at all) are done by trans people, and yet you're choosing to lose your mind over those, and NOT the 99.9% done by cis folks.

Nice self-own.

Per capita its way higher for trans.

You're going to have to show the math for that one, which should include good data on the actual percentage of trans people in the population.

USAFacts/Census Bureau Household Pulse Survey (May–Sep 2024 data): 0.95% of adults (~2.3 million).
Gallup (full-year 2024, released Feb 2025): 1.3% of adults.
Methodology unchanged: large-scale, representative, self-reported surveys with transparent, replicable sampling (Census online households; Gallup random-digit-dial + interviews, n>14,000/year). These remain the gold-standard neutral sources

2019–2023 combined: ~0.85–2% gender-diverse across hundreds of shooters.
Methodology: FBI validation of law enforcement records/investigations; full incident lists published annually with demographics from official sources

If that data is correct and trans people are .95% of adults, yet committed less than .1% of mass shootings (the numbers I cited), your numbers suggest that trans people are a SIGNIFICANTLY lower risk of committing mass shootings. Even if your number of .85% listed as gender diverse (sort of a vague term, that), still suggests that those individuals are less dangerous than the average American adult.

Its 0.85% to 2%. The 2% is higher than the 1.3% of adults.

Well, the .85% is lower, and the category of "gender-diverse" includes a lot of people who are not trans.

In other words not enough data.

True, and given the tiny percentage of the population that is trans against the vast noise of American gun violence, we're unlikely ever to see significant numbers of shootings by trans people.

No, just not enough data and if you take out gangs and suicides the gun numbers drop to record lows.

There is also...