It's almost like they were going against, if not outright rejecting, God/ and the truth and took up dangerous lies and superstition. One of the reasons why the Black Plague got as bad as it did was because of everyone thought cats and certain other animals that kept the rodents(and by extension their fleas and ticks which carried to disease) in check were straight from Satan and had to be destroyed.
With Covid there are similarities. The first casualty was the truth of the whole thing. Then Christians and any one who believe in God were told they couldn't gather to worship. Then there was blaming an animal for being a 'source of the evil' namely a certain species of bat.
The new world order is full of luciferians, I've heard it said he is the god of this world, and I find it telling that everyones belief systems are fine but the one name that causes shrieks and hysterics is Jesus Christ.
Jesus flat out warned any who believe in Him may suffer for it. As for Lucifer, just my viewpoint but I think he hates ALL LIFE on this planet, not just humans. I have no doubt if it were possible he would wipe out all life on Earth down the the cellular level. He'd make the planet as literally lifeless as the moon.
In the rise of pseudo-science, there's been a great departure from actual scientific experiments.
Anything in real science that is defined as a "law" has been proven consistent and calculable expectations over 1000's of experiments testing every variable. But more often than not, real scientific discoveries' initial assumptions and conclusions, after additional experiments are shown to be incorrect and are adjusted throughout further experiments.
The conclusions and conjectured extrapolations from real scientific experiments have gone far beyond what the actual data actually shows. Real science can always be questioned and tested and experimented. The media and people who used to do scientific work have such strong social pressure and influence, that they have departed logically from real science and have entered a different world of what they wish would happen and speculation built on hypotheticals rather than restricting their conclusion to logic and the only what the actual data supports.
Personally I blame Darwin. All the politicking he did to get his theories and hypothesis passed throughout the scientific community set a very bad example for future scientists. Also it's next to impossible to observe natural evolution to reach some kind of conclusion because of how long it's supposed to take. Sure there is controlled environments and experiments BUT that would actually be controlled evolution instead of random evolution.
Before you ask when and where, it was that meme and my assertion that it's the sun getting hotter, not anything man is doing. Mars is showing evidence of getting warmer which suggests a common source for both planets. Please dont try to tell me it's all the rovers we have tooling around on Mars causing it, either way you told me the "experts" dont agree with me, and as we all know when "experts say" we're to just fall in line and nod our sheeple heads in agreement, eh, Chuck E Cheese??
I notice you still haven't responded to my point. Has the deep state not upgraded your bot programming?
Regardless of the issue, once "experts say" or "settled science" is uttered, all debate on the subject is supposed to stop and anyone espousing a contrary opinion is either a "conspiracy theorist" or insane. The flat Earth was settled science until it wasn't.
The theory of gravity was settled science until it wasn't. Bloodletting was settled science until it wasn't. 9 times out of 10 the accepted theories of the day are concrete rules to live by and anyone positing a different view is laughed out of the room by the "experts" until they end up being proven right down the road.
"Experts say" and "settled science" are just ways of shutting down debate the power structure at the time would prefer not to hear.
Is this really necessary? Shut up! Experts say bloodletting is settled science!! "Experts say" and "settled science" are just ways of shutting down debate the power structure doesn't want
