Or A-10s or Apaches or carpet bombing or bunker busters, etc...

Also liberals:
A bunch of unarmed people did an insurrection!!!

I don't think people can "fall for" the truth.

True, people can only fall for lies. And if your comment is intended to stand as a tacit denial that 1/6 was an armed insurrection, I thank you for demonstrating the gullibility of the typical rightwinger.

January 6th wasn't an "armed" insurrection. It was a very stupid protest of the 2020 election results egged on my FBI agitators in the crowds whom unarmed, gullible people followed.

LOL!!! Kash Patel says otherwise. Oops.

Touche. I forgot that the guards who shot the unarmed protesters were armed.

Define "weapon" for everyone, bud. 😏

The US Capital guard that shot that unarmed protester to death was likely outfitted with either the M17 or M18 pistol, because it's the most widely used sidearms in the US armed forces. If we criticize police officers for shooting and killing unarmed men who lunge at and physically assault them, why are we not doing it for the Capital guards who shot unarmed protesters?
Are we all acknowledging suddenly that the use of deadly force is far more complicated than the narrative "cop shoots poor, innocent victim therefore cop bad" the media has been pushing for 20 years or are you just finally done hiding the blatant hypocrisy that the Left wing has been guilty of when you pick and choose which instances of deadly force is justified?

Interesting how you're refusing to furnish the definition of "weapon" after claiming 1/6 wasn't an armed insurrection.

C'mon now, don't be shy; post the dictionary definition of "weapon" for everyone so they can see you've made a valid claim. If you can't or won't, I'll be more than happy to do it for you.

On second thought, no time like the present. I mean...why wait for to you engage in another weak-sauce attempted dodge?

weapon
[ˈwɛp(ə)n]

noun
weapon (noun)
weapons (plural noun)
a thing designed or used for inflicting bodily harm or physical damage

Hey yo you forgot to disable the comments on this one to keep people from calling out your lies. DOon't worry I reminded you.

Wow... you're so desperate to take butthurt, weak-sauce shots at me you're literally fishing through my posts for an opening... LOL!! What's that thing Trump said? Something like "if you're pissing people off, you must be doing something right" or somesuch wasn't it?

Lame response: check
Avoided accountability: check
Brought up Trump out of nowhere: check
The perfect leftist response.

So you're saying Dear Leader is wrong, then?

Actually, let's take your bullshit comment apart:

"Lame response: check"

What's wrong, bud? Can't you handle it when someone accurately describes your fishing through their posts out of butthurt desperation?

"Avoided accountability: check"

Except here I am, standing to account... so now you're a demonstrated liar on top of being a reasonably deduced weak-sauce potshotter.

"Brought up Trump out of nowhere: check"

So I'm only allowed to use direct quotes that fit a situation if they don't originate in the lowings of your sacred cow?

"The perfect leftist response."

Awww... look at you making assumptions.

Lol stay mad and get madder.

Anger's bad for the psyche and detrimental to overall health but you do you, Boo.

I guess you’ve never heard of the French Resistance or the Partisans of Poland, Russia, Yugoslavia, etc etc etc

Clearly, you don’t understand asymmetrical warfare.

Quite the contrary. And, unlike you, I also understand that there's a point at which the asymmetry becomes so great that it might as well be ants trying to topple a giant.

That is literally my point.
smh 🤦

Interesting... so what you're saying is that you're fully aware of the vast gulf between popguns v. bigger popguns and popguns v. laser guided missiles, ir equipped tracker/painter/killer drones, ADS emplacements, tanks, just straight-up blast a hole through a mfer lasers, chunk a mfer in their hidey-hole from the sky MOAB, etc.

So what's the deal? Are you so desperate to engage in gainsay that, even if it means making a fool of yourself, you just can't help spouting off? Seriously, the ants have zero chance of toppling the giant, meanwhile, the giant just has to shift its feet to wipe them out utterly.

Oh... wait... are you living in a Red Dawn, '80s-esque fantasy world where you think you and your buddies are going to miraculously fight off the U.S. military on it's home soil once it's combined might is brought to bear? Is that it? Is that's what's going on? I mean... if so, maybe shake your head less because you might be scrambling your brain.

Spoken like Modda.
I’ve always suspected it, but this just proved it.
No. I am merely pointing out that tanks can be defeated without having to have another tank to do it.

I’ve come to the conclusion that you just like to hear yourself talk, so to speak (yes, I know I know, it’s text, but let’s not pick nits)

You flatter me, sirrah!!

So you're going to be defeating tanks with your available-to-the-public firearms Red Dawn-style, right? Only asking because that's the point of the meme, that's the line away from which you're trying to move the goal-posts.

I was wondering where he would see a resemblance, but then I noticed your first paragraph consisted of one entire long sentence. So I guess that's it.

On the other hand, it was a list of things, as opposed to a meandering discombobulated thing they only finally twists back into itself and congeals into some sort of meaning at the end like mine do. Yours was necessary, my run-ons are a bad habit that I just haven't been able to break since high school no matter how many times the teachers kept noting that I should on my papers.

thing that* finally twists back

No.

No.

Well now... since it's not up to you to decide what is flattering to me, that just leaves the question and statement as candidates for reply... and, as you've opted for a double "no," you've now unwittingly, tacitly agreed with the theme of the OP and also displayed denialism vis-a-vis the matter of your obvious efforts to move the goal posts. 🤔

No