Or A-10s or Apaches or carpet bombing or bunker busters, etc...

I guess you’ve never heard of the French Resistance or the Partisans of Poland, Russia, Yugoslavia, etc etc etc

Clearly, you don’t understand asymmetrical warfare.

Quite the contrary. And, unlike you, I also understand that there's a point at which the asymmetry becomes so great that it might as well be ants trying to topple a giant.

That is literally my point.
smh 🤦

Interesting... so what you're saying is that you're fully aware of the vast gulf between popguns v. bigger popguns and popguns v. laser guided missiles, ir equipped tracker/painter/killer drones, ADS emplacements, tanks, just straight-up blast a hole through a mfer lasers, chunk a mfer in their hidey-hole from the sky MOAB, etc.

So what's the deal? Are you so desperate to engage in gainsay that, even if it means making a fool of yourself, you just can't help spouting off? Seriously, the ants have zero chance of toppling the giant, meanwhile, the giant just has to shift its feet to wipe them out utterly.

Oh... wait... are you living in a Red Dawn, '80s-esque fantasy world where you think you and your buddies are going to miraculously fight off the U.S. military on it's home soil once it's combined might is brought to bear? Is that it? Is that's what's going on? I mean... if so, maybe shake your head less because you might be scrambling your brain.

Spoken like Modda.
I’ve always suspected it, but this just proved it.
No. I am merely pointing out that tanks can be defeated without having to have another tank to do it.

I’ve come to the conclusion that you just like to hear yourself talk, so to speak (yes, I know I know, it’s text, but let’s not pick nits)

You flatter me, sirrah!!

So you're going to be defeating tanks with your available-to-the-public firearms Red Dawn-style, right? Only asking because that's the point of the meme, that's the line away from which you're trying to move the goal-posts.

I was wondering where he would see a resemblance, but then I noticed your first paragraph consisted of one entire long sentence. So I guess that's it.

On the other hand, it was a list of things, as opposed to a meandering discombobulated thing they only finally twists back into itself and congeals into some sort of meaning at the end like mine do. Yours was necessary, my run-ons are a bad habit that I just haven't been able to break since high school no matter how many times the teachers kept noting that I should on my papers.

thing that* finally twists back

No.

No.

Well now... since it's not up to you to decide what is flattering to me, that just leaves the question and statement as candidates for reply... and, as you've opted for a double "no," you've now unwittingly, tacitly agreed with the theme of the OP and also displayed denialism vis-a-vis the matter of your obvious efforts to move the goal posts. 🤔

No

Also liberals:
A bunch of unarmed people did an insurrection!!!