Thou shalt not bear false witness

Misquoting people to make them look bad is the only thing a lefty can do. If they were honest, they'd have nothing to smear people with.

Every single one of those statements are taken out of context. Stop lying. You're just afraid people have seen your true colours and the only things you can do is smear him. Cowards.

They have nothing if they don't do that.

provide that "correct" context then

I did in a different post of mine, you just responded with your retarded comment anyway

Sure you did

You commented on it. Stop playing dumb.

imgflip.com/i/a6qkdu

Seriously go look up the videos those quotes come from.

Nobody has to misquote him to make him look bad

Well, misquoting and taking things out of context. Like the "very fine people" hoax that still so many leftards believe.

### On Gun Violence (April 5, 2023, TPUSA Faith Event)

**Full Statement:**
During a Q&A session at the TPUSA Faith / Freedom Night event in Salt Lake City, Charlie Kirk responded to a question about gun violence and the Second Amendment. The extended context includes the following interconnected remarks:

“I think it’s worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational.

Having an armed citizenry comes with a price, and that is sometimes people might use their Second Amendment freedoms to do bad and evil things, but we have 23,000 gun laws on the books right now. And the problem is not the gun, the problem is the heart of the person holding the gun.

The Second Amendment is not about hunting… The Second Amendment is there, God forbid, so that you can defend yourself against a tyrannical government.

You will never live in a society when you have an armed citizenry and you won’t have a single gun death. That is nonsense. It’s drivel.

You could significantly reduce [gun deaths] through having more fathers in the home, by having more armed guards in front of schools.

Driving comes with a price – 50,000 people die on the road every year… But we have decided that the benefit of driving… is worth the cost of 50,000 people dying on the road.

We need to be very clear that you’re not going to get gun deaths to zero. It will not happen.

Nobody talks like this. They live in a complete alternate universe.

How do you stop school shootings? …How did we stop shootings at baseball games? …Because we have armed guards outside of baseball games.

How did we stop all the shootings at airports? We have armed guards outside of airports.

How do we stop all the shootings at banks? We have armed guards outside of banks.

How did we stop all the shootings at gun shows? Notice there’s not a lot of mass shootings at gun shows… Because everyone’s armed.

If our money and our sporting events and our airplanes have armed guards, why don’t our children [have armed guards]?

If that talk scares you — ‘wow, that’s radical, Charlie’ — then you have not really read any of the literature of our Founding Fathers… You’re just living in Narnia.

You don’t want to face reality that governments tend to get tyrannical and that people need an ability to protect themselves and their families"

On Islam (April 30, 2025, The Charlie Kirk Show)
Full Statement:
In an episode titled "Can Islam and America Coexist? + Remembering David Horowitz," Kirk discussed plans for an Islamic community in Texas and broader concerns about Islam in the U.S. The extended context is:
“So what's going on in Texas, of all places? Mind you, this is not New York. This is not California. This is Texas.
And as you know, Texas Republicans are rather weak at times. They don't really know how to fight.
Well, Muslims in Texas are looking to build their own epic city. Literally, it's called Epic City. The East Plano Islamic Center, deep in the heart of Texas. It's in the northeast suburbs of Dallas. The plan right now is for these Mohammedans to build a 402 acre community in the Dallas suburbs. For reference, that's about four times the size of Disneyland. It would have over 1,000 homes, a K-12 school, a college, retail stores, and, of course, a mosque.
Now let me pause here. When's the last time Christians decided to do this? Christians should build communities like this. I look at the master plan here and I say, despite the fact that their worldview is toxic and that they wanna destroy the West, you gotta give them respect. It's well-designed. It's well-configured. They're here to spread their value system to the West. And we're like, oh, well, you know, religious freedom.
Really, is — did the Founding Fathers have in mind Mohammedans coming to the great state of Texas or one of our states to build an exclusive city for Muslims?
The idea is that this would all be on private property, so it could exist as a dedicated Islamic area. Developers claim the area will be open to all, which of course is rubbish. Though we know and we get the feeling anybody moving in would find themselves not very welcome.
America has freedom of religion, of course, but we should be frank. Large dedicated Islamic areas are a threat to America.
We've seen how this unfolds in Europe. There are massive huge no-go zones in major European cities in Britain and in France and in Sweden. Those are real. You're not allowed to talk about them, but they are real. The police stay out of things. In no-go zones, Islamic values reign supreme. Blasphemy laws, for example. If you dare question the Prophet Mohammed, they will come after you.
Free speech is not an Islamic value. Free expression is not an Islamic value. Exact — it's actually the exact opposite. Submission is an Islamic value. That's literally what Islam

The third quote could be a problem, can you link me a video of that debate so I can get the full context?

Since I know the context for the other quotes, the only other one I personally have a problem with is the one about his 10 year old daughter, but that was an obvious trap question, any answer Charlie gave would look bad. His choice was either stick to his principles and be labeled a misogynist, or be labeled a hypocrite.

As for the rest of the quotes, they're perfectly fine, when one knows the full context.

I meant he'd be labeled a hypocrite and would have lost a lot of his credibility, which was probably the point of the question.

What's the context?

I asked you first.

But to show you a little intellectual mercy, I'll give you the context of the first one. He didn't say black people can't be pilots, he said, in context (not verbatim), that because of Opus DEI policies and diversity quotas, it's hard to trust that a truly qualified black pilot got hired.

Put it this way: let's say you have 10 positions (job irrelevant) and 100 applicants, 90 white and 10 black. If you hire one white person and nine black people because of DEI quotas, it's nearly a statistical impossibility that all nine black people are truly the most qualified for the job.

Great Replacement Strategy (March 1, 2024, The Charlie Kirk Show)
Full Statement:
In an episode addressing immigration and demographic changes, often framed around the "great replacement" concept, Kirk remarked:
“The great replacement strategy, which is well under way every single day in our southern border, is a strategy to replace white rural America with something different.”
(Extended context from available sources describes this as part of a broader critique of Democratic policies on immigration, portraying it as an intentional effort to alter America's demographics, particularly in rural areas, through border crossings and population shifts. No complete episode transcript was located, but the statement ties into discussions of urban-rural divides and the erosion of traditional values.)

On Immigration
Halted Immigration for 40 Years (August 22, 2025, The Charlie Kirk Show)
Full Statement:
In an episode titled "An Unlikely Alliance Against the Mamdani Revolution ft. New York Mayor Eric Adams," Kirk discussed immigration policy and historical pauses in immigration. The extended context is:
“America was at its peak when we halted immigration for 40 years and we dropped our foreign-born percentage to its lowest level ever. We should be unafraid to do that. But for the 50 -- we have 55 million foreigners in this country, and I'm sure many of them are wonderful people, I'm sure. I'm sure some of them are ones that I know, but we've got to take a step back and say, guys, that you're no longer a nation. You're something else. You're a colony.
The idea and the perspective of what we think of the United States of America, I think, needs to be a little bit reconsidered because we have this 30, 40 year old picture that anybody can come here, anyone should come here at any time. And it's just not that simple.”
Democrats Hating the Country and Less White (March 20, 2024, The Charlie Kirk Show)
Full Statement:
During a discussion on border policies, tariffs, and Democratic motivations, Kirk stated:
“Donald Trump said, hey, we're gonna put 5 percent tariff, 10 percent tariff. We're gonna get what we want. Mexico could close their border in an afternoon, but we're allowing Mexico and the cartels to overrun the country because, of course, the American Democrat party wants that to happen. The American Democrat Party hates this country. They wanna see it collapse. They love it when America becomes less white. They love it when America gets overwhelmed, and we keep on saying this. It's Cloward Piven strategy. It's not some sort of abstract theory. It's right there. The Cloward-Piven strategy that was articulated in the 1960s,1970s by these two academics. And even Mexico doesn't want these people. Well, too bad. If Donald Trump wins in November, it'll be the largest deportation force in American history.”

Yes, you are literally taking what he said out of context and its kinda sickening to do that to a dead man.

what's the right context? and him being dead is irrelevant. Should we stop saying mean things about Hitler because he's dead?

I challenge you to go look up his complete statement on each of those quotes. Be a man and see what I'm talking about.

Are you seriously comparing Kirk to Hitler? What the hell is wrong with you?

He's a liberal. You're surprised?

Fair point

Are you seriously saying that because somebody is dead we can't criticize them? What is wrong with you?

No, but have some sensitivity ffs. Kirk was a family man with two young children who watched him get shot. Even so, nothing he has ever done has merited the morally depraved celebrations of his death. If you're gonna ignore that and compare him to f**king Hitler, then you just don't have any humanity.

The saying used to be

You know a lib is lying when his lips are moving.

In the digital age where speech is no longer a requirement you know a lib is lying if they are breathing