This is what the left is so desperate to deflect from

Yeah... you're showing off your real classy "sincerity"...

Misquoted and mischaracterized by leftists who try to vilify him for disagreeing with their dogma.

No you’re being dumb:

"If I see a Black pilot, I’m going to be like, boy, I hope he’s qualified. Because we can assume black people are rarely qualified"

If you look at the actual discussion he was talking about affirmative action leading to lower standards that would cause one to question if they were actually qualified or pushed through with lowered standards to meet the quota. Thats an absolute legitimate question regarding affirmative action and companies setting percentage targets.

"America has freedom of religion, of course, but we should be frank: large dedicated Islamic areas are a threat to America. Any concentration of Muslims in a specific area can automatically be deemed a threat to the entire United States"

Islam is incompatible with western values when they seek to impose their religion on an area they become a majority in. Which they do everywhere that happens. As exemplified by Dearborn Michigan where the Muslim Mayor told a Christian he was not welcome in the city he was a part of for disagreeing on glorifying a terrorist. Islam excludes not America.

1) he was only assuming that because standards are lowered to meet quotas. In addition it was hypothetical. How would you know who is or isn’t a DEI hire. Why would you assume every “Non-White”? Is that your racism showing? Women could be DEI hires. Or gay white men could be too. He was talking about affirmative action laws and pilots in that context.

2. So what he is allowed his opinion, though somehow I think you have his views skewed. He supported traditional roles for men and women and strengthening families. I hadn’t hear he felt women should be stoned to death for displaying their hair or skin, or that they were open game to be raped if not accompanied by a man?

1. It is racist to assume every non-white pilot is underqualified and a DEI hire, also way to twist it like I'm the one being racist.

2. Did once day if he had a 10 year old daughter who was raped and pregnant he would make her give birth to the baby.

It is not racist to question whether a person is an affirmative action, DEI hire who got the job based on skin color, sex or sexual orientation rather than merit and qualifications. Especially whenever quotas are stated the qualifications are invariably lowered. It’s not racism it’s logic and Common sense.

Assuming a person doesn't have the qualifications just because they are not a straight white man is discriminatory. I don't care what race, gender or sexual orientation a person is and I don't assume they aren't qualified for the job.

https://m.youtube.com/shorts/tFo3sXZaZ6s

There you go with your hate or envy towards straight white men. The point is affirmative action lowers the standards. So an affirmative action hire may not be as qualified as a non affirmative action hire. Do whoever benefits from an affirmative action lowered standard regardless of their skin tone may not be as qualified as someone who doesn’t fall into that category.

If one NBA team had to change their hiring because it was determined that a team needed to reflect the make up of America better. They would have to be about half white, with more Latinos than Asians, or Blacks. Would that team beat the teams who hire based on talent and ability?

Your strawmanning me, I don't hate or envy straight white men, I just don't think it's fair to assume every black employee is a DEI hire. Also I don't think there has to be non-white employees, I think anyone who is qualified should get the job regardless of race.

“ I just don't think it's fair to assume every black employee is a DEI hire.”

If the employer has affirmative action or a stated percentage goal, as the company in question in the actual discussion Charlie Kirk had, it is absolutely fair to assume that.

I dont think you actually ever listened to an actual discussion he had on the matter.