The differences between the two parties these days is stark.

Seems we share the same path.
Also the left made it apparent they were consistently on the side of evil and depravity...that too..

The George Floyd statue was the best part

What is evil or depraved about making sure children have school lunches and people are treated equally and have their rights respected under the law?

What are you taking about? I never said anything related to anything you said

You say that the left is consistently on the side of evil and depravity, and I see people on the left supporting equality and helping those in need

I never said that. Nobody did

There's a few distinctions that can be made. 1. Separate Democrat politicians from regular constituents (voters). 2. Separate Dem party member voters Who are trying to climb the ladder within the party versus regular gullible voters who just watch the news. 3. Separate Paid activists and ideological Marxist radicals from the general gullible activist who is sincere about what they THINK their movement stands for.

Anyway, my point is... You have nefarious actors within the party that know exactly what the TRUE agenda is and what they're trying to accomplish. And the regular citizen that supports the party are gullible and brainwashed by the media.

This idea that the left is "helping those in need" is an illusion. It's a con job. They're NEVER helping people in need. The Dem party only helps others (pretends) when it helps them win votes. The dem party plays on people's emotions to manipulate them. Specifically with empathy and sympathy for the less fortunate. Sounds legit right? Until you find out it's not.

The whole open borders thing granting 10's of thousands of migrating immigrants to flood into the country at once.... This was technically an illegal act by the previous administration. Unfortunately though it avoids being Treason by a very tiny loophole within our constitution. It would qualify as treason if A) Those who cross illegally had weapons and B) Giving "aid and comfort to an enemy" doesn't apply to Immigrant civilians.
So, the Dem party committed an act that would cause our founding fathers to roll over in their graves for but It still manages to NOT qualify as treason.

Why do I keep saying it was illegal? Because Allowing Non-legal migrants to cross over the border freely is NOT in accordance with immigration laws and humanitarian protections. 1. They were crossing illegally without going through the legal process. 2. Women were being sex trafficked, Children were being sex trafficked and this also allowed for gang cartels to freely bring even more drugs into our country.

What was the over arching goal for this radical open border policy? Great question!! The main purpose was to flood various states with migrant residents. This shifts the balance of the seats in the house of representatives. Non-citizens are included in the total population count used to determine the number of congressional seats each state receives. More migrants = More dem seats = A dem party takeover. Understand?

You seem like a nice person with sincere questions. That's why I took the time out of my busy schedule to explain one single aspect of how the dem party functions. If you want I can touch up on another topic you're curious about. There's a bunch of ways that the dem party is tricking people. I'm not a fan of the Republican party and most of it's politicians either but there are still a few good one's. Also, FYI.... I lean in favor of supporting MAGA not the Republican party.

you are welcome on our side.
be careful out there, violent Dems lurk...

most of the things on that list are not accurate, and some of them are accurate but who cares, like the Democrat party supporting liberal values. Yeah, so what?

you think the Republican Party cares about the working class when they're the ones pushing to remove as many regulations as possible, and it's those regulations which are designed to keep workers safe, and the environment safe, and communities safe. And if Republicans support law and order, why did they elect a convicted felon and known sexual predator and rapist?

"most of the things on that list are not accurate"...
ok. 20 items on the list.
you are saying that 11 or more items are not accurate.
please specifically list which 11 or more items are not accurate.
base your list on facts, not feelings.
we'll wait....

Actually, I think a better challenge would be for you to list just 3 inaccurate policy positions on this list.

1. The felony court case was 100% fraudulent. It was an activist Democratic judge. Who's daughter literally worked as a Dem fundraiser for Kamala. I could go into greater detail for that issue if you'd like. Also, Trump won in the appeals court for that case and The judge reversed the charges. Trump is no longer "A convicted felon" *eye roll*
2. The sexual predator and rapist claims have no bearing on reality. I've looked into each accusation and none of the accusations and/or lawsuits have any legitimacy. The Katie Johnson character (A pseudonym) was a fictitious character invented by an ex-producer from the Jerry springer t.v. show. Katie Johnson never appeared in court (multiple courts). She was a no show for press conferences and there's only one recording of a blurred out woman with blonde hair who to this day remain anonymous. The E. Jean Caroll "rape" lol case was 100% fraudulent. It was almost as preposterous as the Real estate fraud case against Trump. E. Jean Carol was incapable of recalling any dates of the incident, there was no biological (sperm) evidence, zero witnesses, zero cctv footage and the coat or dress she she said she wore when the incident allegedly occurred wasn't even manufactured during that year..... so, even the outfit didn't exist yet. Also, The court was a civil court. The jury established that there wasn't any evidence to prove that Trump raped her. So they checked off their judgment as "not guilty" for rape but being that a civil court doesn't require "beyond a reasonable doubt" the all liberal jury (without evidence) checked yes on "liable for sexual abuse". Make that make sense?
3. What are liberal values? Can you name any? You mentioned equality.... sure. Equality is nice but that's not what the dem party is pushing for. The Dem's are pushing for equity. Do you know what equity is? It's very different from equality. Besides, we're already equal under the law and that is the legal limitation for equality.
4. The reduction of regulations is a 2 parter.
A) More regulations = Bigger government. This leads to an authoritarian government. This makes anyone calling themselves a "liberal" a contradiction. Liberal by it's own meaning, means liberty. Liberty is freedom. It's incredibly difficult to be free when the corrupt government holds all of the power and creates laws taking away individual freedom. continued..

B) The reduction of regulations sounds bad coming from someone who has been convinced that the world is going to end due to "climate change". That's why it's difficult to explain to you why reducing regulations on company's like oil companies is actually a good thing. I'm very much in favor of a CLEAN earth but the whole "climate" narrative is 100% a LIE. I'm also well versed in Climate science above a basic level. If you have any doubts, I a can break it down in a very simplistic and common sense way that would blow your mind.