Socialist, nazis, communists and fascists are all the same thing. There's no difference.

THE DEVIL IS A DEMOCRAT🔥

https://x.com/i/status/1956425533983715548

So, kids, young adults, parents haven't been taught history in our once great public educational system

Yes, that is correct. Because of the early 20th century Progressives (i.e. communists, fascists, nazis and socialists) our education system has been gradually changed from how to use their brains to how to recite what you have been taught.

Woodrow Wilson was the first president to have revisionist history introduced into public schools. It has just been getting worse and worse over the years. The sheer stupidity I am seeing on college campuses these days makes me sad for the future of this once great nation.

I just saw a video about an author named Charles Murray. He's written several well researched books but one he wrote many years ago, called The Bell Curve, has all of the sudden gotten college twits to scream and pitch fits when he was invited to speak at a college. The Bell Curve is NOT a racist book but it has been maligned by the left and false quotes have been attributed to him. Any any of those twits ever exercised just one brain cell and thought to find out the truth for themselves they wouldn't be there making complete idiots of themselves.

So yes, none of us have gotten a proper education. History has been skewed to present a leftist world view. Our founding fathers, who gave us the greatest nation to have ever existed, are demeaned and relegated to being called rich white slave owners, when that is complete crap. Only a small handful were rich and most of them opposed slavery. Even the ones who owned slaves opposed slavery. Washington and Jefferson both opposed slavery and tried to free their slaves but they both lived in Virginia and it was against the law in Virginia to free your slaves. Jefferson was a state representative before he was president of the United States. He tried several times in the Virginia state legislature to get a bill passed that would allow slave owners to free their slaves but he kept getting shot down by the majority of the state legislature.

No other nation to have ever existed gave so much freedom to its citizens than the US. But because of the left we have been losing those freedoms. We are less free now than when England owned us and no one seems to care.

then name me the two countries that border Liechtenstein.

Why? Probably Switzerland and Austria or maybe Germany, I don't remember. Name me what states in the Unites States of America does Tennessee border? In the lower 48 states, what state has the tallest mountain? What is the tallest mountain in the UK? How many islands are in the Philippines? What is the dialect of Spanish that is spoken in Mexico City? What is the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow?

1. Arkansas, Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Virginia, North Carolina, and Missouri
2. Mount Whitney
3. Ben Nevis
4. 7,641
5. Chilango
6. 11mps

🤣🤣🤣. Wrong!!!! It's 21mph. 🤣🤣🤣. Plus you never asked if it was an English or African swallow.

Pretty good of you look up and find chilango. My wife's family are from Sineloa and they speak culichi.

11mps.
11 meters per second, which is roughly 24.6mph

which is the approximate airspeed velocity of the European unladen swallow.

There used to be a website dedicated to this question. It may still exist but I couldn't find it.

So, I asked ChatGPT and here is the answer I got:

----------------------------
Ah, the classic question from *Monty Python and the Holy Grail*! 🏰🐦

> **"What is the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow?"**

To which the correct response is, of course:

> **"What do you mean? An African or European swallow?"**

---

But if you’re after a **real-world estimate**, here’s the nerdy breakdown:

* **European Swallow (*Hirundo rustica*)** has an estimated cruising airspeed of:

* **\~11 meters per second**
* or about **40 kilometers per hour** (\~25 mph)

This is based on ornithological studies of flight speed during migration and normal travel.

African swallows, of which there are many species, vary more widely — and we don’t have as exact a number for them.

So in conclusion:

> **Airspeed of an unladen European swallow: \~25 mph (40 km/h)**

Unless, of course... it’s carrying a coconut. 🥥

Do you hate nazis and fascists? 'Cause they're showing up to President "Stop Talking About Epsteing" Trump's rallies and not anyone elses.

So... they really love y'all.

The only ones who show up at anything conservative are the paid actors that show up and leave at the exact same time the media shows up and leaves. I used to go to Tea Party events and this would get announced to not engage with the paid actors because they media is there and that is what they want.

The only fascists and Nazis that are Republican all came over from the Democrat Party. Perhaps they were paid to by the Dems, I don't know. The right has absolutely nothing do to with fascists, Nazis, socialists or communists. They are all the same thing. Fascism, Nazism and communism are all variants of socialism. They are all forms of collectivism where the government seeks to control the means of production, where wealth is redistributed in a insane attempt to be equal. They all promise free healthcare and free education from childhood to universities. They all take individual property rights away because everything is owned by the collective (aka the oligarchy).

None of that is even close to what the founding fathers gave us. There is no freedom and liberty in collectivism. There are no inalienable rights granted to us by our Creator in collectivism.

They are just bogus attempts by toxic narcissists to control people. Nothing more and nothing less.

That is exactly why if you see someone who is identifiably a Nazis or a fascist at anything conservative it is because they are there with the media. It is all about the narrative. And, yes, the media has been lying their butts off when it comes to politics. They are unrelenting in their protection of the Democrat narrative.

Socialism is authoritarian economically only because it is designed to promote economic equality through public ownership of resources and industries. Workers unions are a good example of such which exists in the USA, as demanding safe work conditions, decent wages, and health/dental benefits takes away the ability of the business to be fully privatized and autonomous from government.

Social services however are not Socialism. The police are a social service which is authoritarian, but others like schools, road service, and hospitals are not, further extending to Social Security, Medicare, and Food Stamps. They are not Socialist. They could be made entirely Capitalist by removing government from them, privatizing them, and them being ran like a business rather than a service to the public, similar to car insurance which one pays more into, in the case that something happens and need help in the future. This wouldn't help people born with problems, as they would die off in agony before being able to pay towards the services.

It would lower taxes significantly, and businesses wouldn't have to worry about the needs of their employees, focusing only on production and profiting. These insurance companies could make billions off from the masses, having to pay little back, and if people want a decent road to drive on, they can pay for their section as a community, rather than expecting it handed out to them. If people want protection from the police, they could pay for the protection, which many Americans already have to pay for privatized security systems as it is. A fully Capitalist society would require people to pay for the services that they receive, and would boost the profits of businesses, while vastly reducing government power over the people and the businesses. If people end up without power lines to their home, a working sewer system, or a road to drive on, it will be their own fault for not paying it.

"Social services however are not Socialism."

While this is true, it is social programs that move closer to socialism.

"They could be made entirely Capitalist by removing government from them, privatizing them"

Any service that actually provides any value to the people should be privatized otherwise it is a drain on the economy. The more the government confiscates from the people the bigger the drain on the economy.

"It would lower taxes significantly, and businesses wouldn't have to worry about the needs of their employees, focusing only on production and profiting."

You don't understand the business world, especially in a free market. There are two things that business must focus on in order to stay in operation, 1) the customer 2) the employees. If customers go else where the business falls apart. If employees go somewhere else the business also falls apart. It is a real struggle for business owners to balance the price they charge their customers and the salary they pay their employees. If you pay your employees generously then the cost of the product and/or service goes up and you turn customers away. If you pay your employees to little so that you can keep the cost of the product down then you turn employees away.

This is a concept that, while is well known in the business world, seems to elude people on the left. They thing businesses are only concerned with profits and nothing else. Any business who focused entirely on profits alone will lose both customers and employees. The simple fact of the matter, any business who works to satisfy both customers and employees sufficiently will increase their profits, providing they have a product or service that people want.

A Capitalist society does not always charge for services. Many times to compete they have to provide more for less and sometimes they give away stuff. It happens all of the time. You have mostly likely gotten free stuff from some business at least once in your life but because that doesn't fit your ideology you just discarded it.

"If people end up without power lines to their home, a working sewer system, or a road to drive on, it will be their own fault for not paying it."

It just depends on how much you want to pay for those services. If it is privatized then you will pay significantly less than if the government does it? Why? Because governments have no incentive for efficiency or value. They get paid by confiscating money from you however they want to.