Democrat Anger + Democrat Logic = Democrat Anger (Democrat Logic has a value of zero)

Yep . . . you pretty much nailed the mental age AND thought processes of the average 'adult' leftist.

Pattern? What pattern? Are you high?

You're connecting two events that have nothing to do with each other.

Of course Trump isn't responsible for the Texas floods ffs. Just because he doesn't give a shit about climate stuff doesn't mean he's responsible for the floods in Texas. That's ridiculous.

And what on earth has that got to do with something that happened in 1889?

WHAT ARE YOU SMOKING?

Whatever it is, I want it NOW.

Pattern. Are you an automatic insulter? It's called satire, it's called irony, it's called humor, it's called sarcasm, it's called spoof. These things only require a hint of truth to be truly funny to those who are not deathly serious about everything.
So, you may have missed the memo. An extensive number of exclusively democrat leaning pundits and commentators automatically blamed Trump, Doge, and the elimination of fraud and fiscal abuse for the deaths of the citizens of Texas during the flash flood. As you rightly state, Trump was not responsible for a natural disaster. Neither was he responsible for the Johnstown Flood, but that doesn't stop the TDS crowd from blaming him for everything including birthdays. Keep in mind the subtle reference to Benjamin Harrison, who won the presidency in the electoral college while losing the popular vote. This type of situation caused heartburn among many TDS'ers in the recent past, who felt like the Grover Cleveland democrats of 1898, that somehow the system had failed, when in fact it accomplished precisely what it was designed to do- equalize the political power of populous and less populated states. Trump had nothing to do with that either, hence a classic irony was applied to the meme.
As for what I'm smoking, I don't think you really want it, there are 20 forest fires burning around me right now, in in my local National Park.
Climate change is a fraud, and always has been. The wrapping paper is starting to come off the scam over the last 6 months as scientists who believe in the scientific method are finally free to use science instead of consensus. Remember only 3 more shopping years for AOC and the UNs promised extinction of 1 MILLION SPECIES!!!!! Shrill shrieking sounds. Such a shame real science records about 35 extinctions (orchids in Thailand or someplace like that) and over 200 newly discovered species. Alas, they'll need to find another way to confiscate other people's stuff now.

Please forgive the typos "1888" and "2 in my local National Park." These are serious infractions and deserve immediate censure.

You're forgiven. Don't sweat it.

I am a bit of a jerk, it's true. And I did get it was supposed to be satire. I just have to stick up for my crazy leftie brothers and sisters. 🤔 I agree some of us can get a bit hysterical at times.

Not sure about the extinction figures you quoted (think quite a few have yet to be discovered and it's a lot more than just 35 extinctions in recent years) but anyway sorry about your wildfires. That's no laughing matter at least.

Climate change is entirely political. I'm one of many who have been severely punished for pointing to science that contradicts the narrative. Dr. John Christy (professor) is considered one of the finest statisticians in the world. He had no dog in the climate fight. He compiled a massive analysis of weather data and found disparity between the historic data and the narrative data. He was a presenter at a major climate conference with the sole intention of helping perfect flaws in the sacred computer model projections, in no way was he there to dispute climate change, in fact he believed that he could help with solving the "crisis" by improving the data. He only intended to help improve the accuracy of the projections. What I witnessed them do to him was shameful. The barrage of vicious attacks against him personally and the concerted effort to destroy him professionally was uncalled for and completely unmerited. The research he submitted was not disputed, primarily because he was right, he was destroyed because he deviated from the script. He was so upset, he vowed to never help climate research again. Don't confuse him with his son if you research him.
Dr. Roy Spencer, former NASA climate expert released research showing that water vapor has more influence on temperatures than CO2. Again, personally and professionally destroyed.
I showed with laws of physics that CO2 does not "do the things they say it does." I showed geologic sciences disproving the claims of never warmer. I showed biological data that measured CO2 levels are nearly 10 times the planet destroying 400 parts per million CO2 downstream of rainforests, such as the Pacific Northwest and Amazon. I showed the flaws in the Vostok ice core data, basically I used every accepted science to show the climate change hypothesis was completely flawed. Attack the data from the sciences I cited? No. Attack and destroy the messenger. That's not science.