Criminal Lives Matter!

A fascinating exercise in cherrypicking.

And of course your source material comes from a known purveyor of fake news...

Now you sound like MAGA extremist.
What happened to "trust the mainstream media" vibe?

I can't account for whatever scenarios are playing out in your head but I'm confident enough to postulate that a MAGA extremist likely wouldn't call out racially biased cherrypicking ostensibly supporting the oft-employed "inherent criminality" talking point.

An ideal news source leans neither right nor left and has an impeccable track record for factual reporting. Facts are facts: The Daily Mail is neither of those things nor is it even close, has repeatedly failed fact checks, is significantly right-biased and a known purveyor of mis/disinformation.

Who said anything about race? Wait! Are you insinuating that people from perticular "race" are criminal?

Well now you definitely ringing right right wing extremism.

Lemme guess, Klan fan?

You singled out a "perticular" racial group with your meme sooo... yeah, you dogwhistled the eff out of it. As far as me being a Klan fan, the answer is no. Which brings things back to your meme singling out a racial group; given its focus on said racial group, the only Klan fan here is demonstratedly you.

The Klan is good for environment. I didn't say anything about humanity nor I give two shoots about humanity.

How can I be fan of Klan? The Klan is afraid of me. I'm Evil.

I didn't singled out any race. I just listed a number of crimes reported. I just see criminals and victims. But you see races. That very well explains who's holding the whistle here.

Yes, I do see race; only a liar would deny seeing it. I especially see it when it's been used to forward a subtextual narrative of just one race being the aggressor group and just one other race as the victim group because crime doesn't discriminate, criminality doesn't belong to one and only one racial group as your meme clearly intends to purport. If, as you claim, you "just see criminals and victims," you wouldn't so obviously have gone out of the way to cherrypick stories of one specific racial group committing crimes against another specific racial group.

Tell me, does that dogwhistle come with a hood or are they sold separately?

You see only a racist see race. Race is a social construct. It's not real. We're all the same. Eternally damned by our darklord Baal.

The dog whistle, I don't buy them seperately. Why? Because I don't need one. I can blow the whistle on my own and hoods & caps don't suit me because of the thorns.

And that image above I didn't make it. I just lifted off of social media. (Why? Because sloth is a sin and I'm a sinner.)
Where I see a buncha criminals and their victims. To each their own.

Thanks for letting us know about your identity Mx. Skinhead.

And there's the inevitable name-calling.

Anyway, race isn't a social construct; "race," in this context, denotes broad phenotypic subdivisions of the Human species. Thank you for demonstrating you're either ignorant or a science denialist.

Thank you for demonstrating that you categorize the Klan as "not evil".

Also, thank you for denying you employ dog whistles in the wake of posting prima facie evidence to the contrary. It really serves as underpinning for the fact that you can claim you lifted the content of your post off of social media and maybe you did, maybe you didn't. I'm reasonably, justifiably inclined to assume you're lying because you're being called out for posting what is clearly a racially biased meme, demonstrating racial bias. Which brings us back to only liars claiming they don't see race; everyone sees race and we have brains sufficiently developed to recognize the evolutionary adaptative differentiation amongst our own species without allowing it to rule our decision making. Those who insist they don't see race are dishonest with themselves and everyone else, are not to be trusted -primarily because those whom insist they don't are likely over-compensatively trying to cover animosity toward, fear of those whose skin color doesn't meet their "like me" acceptability threshold.

So, to re-cap, over the course of our exchange, you've demonstrated you're either a science denying religious fanatic or a scientifically illiterate religious fanatic, that, in your view, the Klan isn't an "evil" influence on society, you've admitted to dog whistling, either lied by claiming you didn't put a racist collage together or truthfully confessed to appropriating someone else's racist collage thereby condoning its racially biased messaging.

"everyone sees race"

Okay grab 5 peeps and bring them here.

"Anyway, race isn't a social construct; "race," in this context, denotes broad phenotypic subdivisions of the Human species. "

What in this context? How do you define race. Please elaborate science Führer.

"Thank you for demonstrating that you categorize the Klan as "not evil"."

Yup they're not evil. They're good people like you. Like you good people they see race.
I don't see because I'm the evil one.

Wow... I didn't think it'd be that easy to get you to confirm you believe the Klan is a "good" influence on Humanity. You're one seriously sick puppy, buddy.

CNN?

Well now, that kind of fail reading comprehension speaks volumes... especially given your alleged "personal library has more than 3000 volumes of history, non-fiction, and reference items." You know that just looking at the pictures in books doesn't meet the qualifying theshold for the title of "voracious reader," right?

Oh, my, did he claim that too?

He owns 1293 acres in Texas too. His spread is so big, it's unaffected by bad weather and blackouts that have rolled through Texas in recent years.

Yup, about 5/8 down the page.

imgflip.com/i/a1bl8a?nerp=1756646577#com37326534

My bad, I actually saw and forgot that. I had already upvoted everybody else on that page. If you scroll down, you'll see where he said he owns 1235 acres.

I wonder what else I forgot on that meme.

Ahhhh… another one of the many many many many many ad nauseum alt-accounts of my longtime stalker.
It all makes sense, now… it appears that you suffer from Disassociative Identity Disorder.

Interesting... you levy accusations of alt-account stalkery and yet you're the one who chased me down to respond to a comment on an OP that one would reasonably assume has no non-alt-acc connection to yourself. That sound an awful lot like you're doing some hard projecting, M.P.

So, now that the obvious attempt at changing the subject is out of the way, let's talk about how, in a prior exchange with me, you claimed to be a "voracious reader" with a personal library of over 3000 volumes and yet, despite your self-alleged "voracious reader" status, you clearly demonstrate a level of reading comprehension unworthy of someone purportedly in possession of such a library. What's going on there, M.P.? What's that all about?

Wow. I really must have touched a nerve.
😂

Not my fault that you clonked yourself in the ulnar nerve. Although points for being able to admit it.