there is a difference between a historical wall and forcing people out of your countrt

That is a very lame excuse... are you sure you can't do better?

It's not only an excuse, it's a historical fact.
Plus the wall is part of the attraction to tourists, which have no trouble getting through.

Your point is invalid. Still a wall, why is that so hard to understand? Most 4 yr old kids know what a wall is.

My problem is that Mexico isn't INVADING us with a military force. Immigrants (unrelated to the government are coming)

The problem is that we need to set country leaders accountable for their people, instead of US taking all the unwanted people. Whe need to send them back, they are not our responsability.

Can you agree that trumps (hypothetical) wall and the Vatican wall are different for why they were created

A wall is a wall. That I can agree to. Pope has no right to make that statement. Luckily he won't be making any more hypocrite statements any more.

Both Chichén Itzá and the Great Pyramid of Giza are pyramids, but Chichén Itzá was a temple for worship, and the Great Pyramid of Giza was a tomb. Different purposes, same structure.

The wall in the Vatican was created to keep people out. That is what walls do. Unlike the Berlin wall, there has been zero efforts to take the Vatican wall down. Now pope statement is out of place for several reasons 1. Vatican. City does not have illegal immigration problem US does, they do not give a rat's butt about the illegal immigrants entering US and have not lifted a finger to help any of them 2. Within the wall context, it is hypocritical because they are surrounded by a wall 3. They can't say who and who is not a Christian when they themselves go agaist Jesus teaching and they pretend to elevate to God's authority. Hypocrisy is all they have.

You're wrong, again! Walls aren't always to keep people out, while the pomerium was originally to keep people out, it became a symbolic wall, as Rome (the thing it was made to protect) became larger than it. Also, probably cause they can't help with it because their GDP is 21.2 million, and they are completely surrounded by Italy.

Pope doesn’t practice what he preaches. The Vatican took in zero immigrants from Africa or South America.

Probably cause it's just a really big church. And a town square.

Certainly, they have a spare bedroom or two. Plus, there should be room for tents.

Yeah, they have other buildings, i was overexaggerating

400,000 people just attended the Pope’s funeral service. That’s room for a lot of tents.

You get a cookie for funny joke 🍪

Should have just stuck to wearing funny hats and keeping his mouth shut

The wall currently around the Vatican was put into place after the papal states were conquered by Italy. This was because the Pope did not want the Vatican hill (where st. Peter's Basilica is) to be taken over by the Kingdom of Italy.

Yes, it was there to keep people away, yes we know....

There's a big difference from keeping out migrants and stopping a foreign country from territorially annexing another

No walls work to keep people out and clearly they work. How many illegal immigrants is the Vatican city housing? Still does not change is hypocritical from the pope to talk that way when Vatican city is surrounded by a wall. Again 0 efforts to take it down. And specially who gives him the right to declare who are Christians or not? They themselves are not Christians.

Of course, there's no immigrants in Vatican City, there's no jobs there. You have to work your way up from being a priest to get a job in the Vatican City.

It gets better. Ask the OP where he was born, and how did he get here.
He's quite literally the subject of many of his complaints.

Well then I guess the pope is not a subject expert, now is he?

?