I think we can safely call that a demonstrably shi**y job if we're being naively generous eh

https://youtu.be/GupyEudjdNw?si=kBUDqynU1k2MjkfQ

I mean I know that people can handle work without being at the place

But that doesn't even mean the IG's were not at work

The actual reality is that they obviously did what they were asked to do to keep the corruption and waste going. But joking about that wouldn't be funny

But they don't do corruption

In the video used before, they found someone who went with their wife to another place, a few hours of meetings but the rest was spent on non government stuff

Non-governmental stuff exactly. Yeah there's no reason to think they themselves did corruption. Their existence needed to be utilized on good things as well as looking past things like government corruption. I read and shared some of their reports from the past two years.

The Trump admin hasn't found their replacements yet, but the news came out yesterday, and it would ofc be nice to know why, even though it legally speaking doesn't need to be detailed.

But I pretty much know why, since every single one had to go. If they were all inserted by Democrats, they're compromised. There's no Democrat loyalist who isn't deliberately going against Trump for the sake of the Establishment and its corrupt system's safety. Loyalty to the EU and George Soros gives the same result (their goals go hand in hand with the Dems), since the job DOGE and Trump wants done hurts those a lot as well.

It's extremely sad and brings the most troublesome precedence, but as a former Trump sceptic I've slowly come to trust their Libertarian work the more I fact-check the deranged and compromised media's stories.

Yes. My brain right now is short circuiting but yea

I think my main problem with the firing is the process to fire them didn't happen and it feels like IG are...were doge

The interview if you like :) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ZfotdjNi-M

I totally get that. I just wish the media would look at everything, instead of sounding like a politician who creates a mythology around their opponents.
Btw. I'm watching FOX's 30 minutes Musk & Staff interview right now. Came out 8 hours ago. I can imagine a Media headline like this:
"DOGE Staffer Is A Banker With Morgan & Stanley: Conflict Of Interest?", ignoring that he's a DOGE Officer of Personnel Management. Another guy is a freaking rocket scientist!

Honestly I think musk is probably really good with business and science but he doesn't seem like should do politics

And yea I feel like sometimes the news be a bit ehhh

I feel like the fox news thing on Alexa is non partisan (serious)

Yea I know this from being a guy on the left listening to some form of fox news be a little critical of trump at all

Well a bit more than a little

But also thank you for linking the interview very nice of you to do so

Yeah, he's actually my worst enemy philosophically, as he's a Transhumanist, but that's another story. I wouldn't like if he had a cabinet position, like prioritizing healthcare standards or military. I'm not even a Libertarian myself, but if someone has a position that involves free speech or government efficiency, I'd want a principled Libertarian like him

What ever DOGE finds goes directly to the government but with his recommendations. When ever I see a Musk update on it on X, it's about new findings and a personal opinion of his. Not often I see a post from the DOGE page.
They're generally moving services around to other agencies, and through a Libertarian friend of mine, I already know that that is the ideological standard when doing this kinda stuff.

I he goes both to far and to little free

I can find illegal content on Twitter in under a minute

I am not joking, I timed it. It is super easy that it should be able to be easily found and banned if not reported.

Elon has also apparently censored some things

He ruined Twitter

Also don't trust doge site, it's filled with math errors

But they work with willing and talented federal workers on the ground, so someone would've told them this. Un-LESS... it's a deliberate misinterpretation *dramatic music* imgflip.com/gif/9o9lxv

You mean the 9 and 120 yo old welfare and loan recipients where the old system supposedly makes the numbers look like that when they're not?
I understand that desperate narrative. The "DOGE is so up to date, but their cool, young and fresh tech guys don't understand the old"-strategy.
CNN was very hurt that the agency also contains older tech people, they spent a good portion complaining that Elon The Transparent never bragged about that.

Anyway, I don't trust that narrative at all. It has to be the usual process of someone at the top invents a ridiculous theory, and others now feel obligated to act as if they've made that analysis.
There are too many tech people looking at all this for such a thing to be true

Or were you thinking about another math thing?

Fair

I haven't really seen memes here feelsike just politics to be politics

Sorry mate

I understand, cos you're right. It's all just expressions of opinion without any attempt at irony, sarcasm or creativity, so one's mindset has just accepted that reality

I'ma go and try to make a funny one instead of politik

Because I am gonna say I definitely have made stuff with political intent