Not everything is corrupt

If they rule against existing law and the constitution they are treasonous or at best seditionists.

Bruh
Nahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Slavery?
Poll tax?
Jim Crow laws?
Seperate but equal?
Women can't vote?
Black people aren't citizens?

Are you f**king nuts?

These were laws or rulings
They have changed are you saying that laws promoting racism should be back?

No your f**king not but that's the logic that your using

THINK

That's for congress to change. The judiciary has only been allowed to declare things unconstitutional because the president chose to not enforce laws that they say aren't constitutional. It's only tradition and not in the constitution anywhere.
Nice strawman though. Procedure of law has nothing to do with whether a law is racist or not.

680 unelected District Court Judges, not even National Circuit jurisdiciton,
exercising their self anointed AUTHORITY.
overruling actions by a duly elected President of the Executive Branch as never before,
is NOT
an example of Checks & Balances, yet Tyranny in direct rejection of the U.S. Constitution, Article 2

Shut.

Trump appointmented 174 anyway and also

THIS AINT ABOUT THAT

Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_federal_judges_appointed_by_Donald_Trump#:~:text=As%20of%20March%201%2C%202025,the%20United%20States%20Court%20of

...and that leaves the unelected 506... so you're assurance that this ain't political falls on deaf ears
All it takes is one radical district court judge to rise above the Executive Branch? That weakens the office as intended and precedence set for all time, until now.

So, take that garbage and your "shut" to the dump.

Honestly, how about you think about how they got there

Appointmented by others

And no, I shall return to sender

Shut

*sendee