Technically use of an auto pen could allow Schiff, a known agent of China, to put in a document signing sovereignty over to China, and Biden would have signed it without anyone knowing.
All of this is true and any NON-partisan judge would so rule. A live, true signature is required for all legal documents unless it's someone physically incapable of doing so. Then there must be appointed witnesses or someone with the power of attorney.
Those people pardoned by Biden are on borrowed time if Trump and company decide to push it.
It's like Biden's Presidency was one big show of which nothing was real, and I did see the mock oval office. And any investigation or court action that happens as a result of this action should be good viewing.
It would be vastly entertaining; although true 'justice' in a ruling would result in the entirety of all Biden pardons AND executive orders being null and void for his presidency. I can't quite see any judge being that courageous.
JOE BIDEN SIGNED ALL DOCUMENTS DURING HIS TENURE WITH AUTOPEN; EXCEPT WHEN HE PULLED OUT OF THE 2024 PRESIDENTIAL RACE, INCLUDING SIGNING PARDONS WHILE ON VACATION. AND WOULD THE USE OF THE AUTOPEN ON DOCUMENTS, INCLUDING PARDONS MAKE THEM NOT VALID, AND NOT ABLE TO STAND UP IN COURT? BUT DOESN'T HE HAVE TO BE PRESENT FOR THOSE SIGNINGS?
