Imgflip Logo Icon

Audit the entirety of government

Audit the entirety of government | D.O.G.E. IS OPPOSED BY ONLY FOUR GROUPS:; 1. Democrats
2. NGO Workers
3. NGO $$$ Recipients
4. Money laundering criminals; And in some cases, one person meets all four criteria! | image tagged in elon musk,doge,dept of gov efficiency | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
103 views 8 upvotes Made by I-know-what-im-talking-about 1 month ago in conservatives
Elon Musk memeCaption this Meme
42 Comments
2 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Elon’s saving us billions. No idea how Democrats can rationally have a problem with that
2 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Boggles the mind
2 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Democrats are the ones profiting bigly from the waste, that’s why
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
No doubt. They're the ones screaming for Elon to stop uncovering their abuse of the American taxpayer.
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
Glad Elon’s doing it tbh
0 ups, 4w,
1 reply
Talking to wall | image tagged in talking to wall | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
Isn't talking to yourself something insane people do, the libtards won't even see this
0 ups, 4w,
1 reply
I wasn’t trying to talk to libs. I was just saying it
0 ups, 4w,
1 reply
Oh sorry I confused you with he-may-or-may-not-know-what-he's-talking-about because of profile picture
0 ups, 4w,
1 reply
My pfp is given to me by Imgflip, I kinda forgot what it looked like
1 up, 4w,
1 reply
Oh
0 ups, 4w
Oh, that guy. Yeah, he’s nuts
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Oh, wow, didn't think you would be a republican of all people, know-what-you're-talking-about
I mean you are pretty old
0 ups, 4w,
2 replies
Better not make fun of me or Yahweh may send two she-bears to kill you. Such a loving god...
0 ups, 4w,
1 reply
We're not living before Jesus anymore gramps move on 🥀
0 ups, 4w,
1 reply
Making fun of the Heavenly Father I see … calling Jesus’ Father “irrelevant”. Hmmm … that sounds like blasphemy.
0 ups, 4w,
1 reply
No, I'm just saying that God won't send bears down on people anymore
Besides, why would he even send down bears for you, of all people?
0 ups, 4w,
1 reply
Why the change? Remember that Jesus himself said that it is easier for the universe to fall apart than any one piece of the Mosaic law (Luke 15:17). Is your universe falling apart yet? If not, the Mosaic Law still applies…according to Jesus. Jesus berated people for disobeying the Mosaic Law (John 7:19). Paul is the one who said we don't live under the law but under grace. Jesus says otherwise.

God is the same yesterday, today, and forever, right?

Use some logic for once and abandon this silly man made religion.
0 ups, 4w,
1 reply
Then why did Jesus die
Also when Jesus was alive it still applied because he hadn't died yet
If it's man made, then why does it go against man's desires?
Also, if we disobey the law, we can freely get the grace of Jesus through remorse, is what Paul meant
0 ups, 4w,
2 replies
Jesus only existed in Paul's mind. Entire communities of Christians in the first century CE thought he was only a spirit. Some had no concept of him dying at all. Ask yourself how these communities were established.

Jesus never existed.

I know you're too scared to read it, but "Nailed" by David Fitzgerald will open your closed little mind. There are lots of pages and not many pictures though so you may struggle.
0 ups, 4w,
4 replies
If he never existed, then why did he get more famous than every other self proclaimed messiah or religious figure
1 up, 4w,
2 replies
The NT was written to expand Christianity.

Christianity goes against man's desires? How so?

Christianity provides people with he ability to resolve all guilt by speaking to a god in their mind.
Christianity gives people a free pass from any crimes they've committed in their life.
Christianity allows repentance without any work on the person's part.

Christianity is man-made and made in a way that makes life easier. So no, Christianity does not go against man's desires.
1 up, 4w
Well put!
But I sense an incoming "persecution complex" argument. See my response on your other meme.
0 ups, 4w
Matthew 5:28-29
Luke 12:15
1 Corinthians 6:13
Philippians 2:3
Should I say more verses going against man's desires, or can you please shut up?
And christianity didn't exist before the events stated in the New Testament happened. It was Judaism that existed for the OT.
And it doesn't make life easier, it makes after life easier.
1 up, 4w,
1 reply
God was also purposely created as a fictional character for a book called the bible.

I'm pretty sure adam is also fictional. Even so, tracing a character back to another isn't difficult.
0 ups, 4w
So why do you think the Bible, more specifically the NT, was even written? And if the religion is man made, why does it go against man's desires?
1 up, 4w,
2 replies
Uncle Sam is huge in the US, and he has never existed. There are tons of famous historical figures that have never existed. (I'm not even conservative, I'm only here because you've sent me 50+ notifications and won't shut up about Jesus.)
0 ups, 4w
That is a horrible analogy, Uncle Sam was purposefully created as a fictional character, Jesus clearly is not if he has his entire bloodline from Adam laid out in the Bible
0 ups, 4w
He can't prove that Jesus, God, Zeus, Thor, Odin, Ra, Brahma, Marduk weren't real either, nor can he prove that any of them were or were not created as fictional characters.
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Yes, please do. You've only named 4 verses that supposedly go against man's desires.

You think those commands are unique to Christianity, but they are not. Almost all religions have rules against supposed "adultery"
0 ups, 3w
Yeah, but Christianity gives a way to actually do that without having to hope that human nature doesn't kick in. By the way, by desires, I mean lust, gluttony, pride, ect.,
NOT hope that we don't float in eternal nothingness after death
0 ups, 4w,
3 replies
But Jesus is one of the most documented men in history. Even atheists concede that Jesus was a real person. He’s mentioned in Christianity, Judaism, and Islam. If we know one thing about Jesus, it’s that he existed.
0 ups, 4w,
3 replies
Wrong. On so many counts. Read On the Historicity of Jesus by Dr. Richard Carrier. Read anything by Dr. Robert Price. Read anything by David Fitzgerald. Read your competition so you actually know how to argue against them ... then cry because you'll figure out that at most, Jesus was just some itinerate apocalyptic Essene preacher who Paul elevated to be a god. Read How Jesus Became God by Bart Ehrman.
1 up, 4w
(Response to your reply)

Yeah, they can't prove that their god is true while claiming others are false because they believe in faith and not sight. Their god specifically tells them to believe without seeing (having proof) so they can't claim another god is fake when they have no proof for their own other than faith.
0 ups, 4w
There are no historical records from the time period. Period. And you twisted my words (typical of a christian).

Why do ZERO contemporary historians mention Jesus … especially considering their inclination to write about much more boring messianic figures and mundane events in Judea during that same time period (note that NO ONE ever mentions miracles. No. One.)? The solitary reference to Jesus by Josephus is widely contested among non-Biblical scholars, further complicating efforts to establish a concrete historical basis for the gospel narratives. Even early church father Origen lamented the lack of a reference to his Messiah by Josephus but ironically, Origen's OWN copy of Josephus' works two centuries later came under the ownership of the Bishop of Rome, Eusebius (a known and proven forger of ancient documents - he even wrote a fake letter to Pilate from Paul and tried to pass if off as genuine). Yet no apologist finds it odd that Origen, reading his copy, lamented the lack of a Jesus call out while that same exact copy, in Eusebius' hands, miraculously has a mention of a devout Jew, Josephus, calling Jesus “the Messiah” yet he fails to worship him and following the mention, goes right back to what he was writing about. Any Jew who truly believed Jesus was the Messiah would’ve acted far differently than Josephus at this realization. This passage is forced into a section of his writings in a completely un-Josephus manner. Leaving it out makes the text flow as the other hundred thousand words he wrote. I along with ALL non religious historians call total BS on the Testimonium Flavianum.
0 ups, 4w
You’re now saying Jesus was a preacher. I thought you said Jesus only existed in Paul’s mind? Look, Jesus existed, that’s all I’m saying. And according to historical records, Jesus was a great guy.
0 ups, 4w,
2 replies
The other 21 known contemporary historians should have noticed because according to Matthew, “Jesus' fame spread far and wide all over the land.” The Gospels all insist that Jesus was renowned not just throughout all Jerusalem but the entire region of Palestine, the Decapolis and Syria. If you add the book of Acts, then Jesus’ fame supposedly quickly spreads to Asia Minor, Egypt, Greece, Rome and still further, throughout the Mediterranean world. Add wide-reaching political events and spectacular, unprecedented miracles allegedly witnessed by multitudes on top of that, and the lack of corroboration for the Gospels and Acts is a serious problem. But not if you realize is is a work of fiction.

Suddenly it doesn’t seem reasonable at all just to assume that the preacher Jesus Christ of Nazareth just HAD to have been a real person. Especially when one sees the number of ancient writers who had opportunity and more importantly, motive, to discuss Jesus in their writings, many of which have survived to this day. In many cases, these same writers have much to say about other much less interesting messiahs – but not Jesus, the only one who supposedly really did the miracles all the would-be saviors promised. We are left with a "Gospel of the Gaps.”

But there were many first century writers, philosophers, historians, and other commentators who had good reason to notice Jesus, and despite apologists’ fervent denials, a wealth of their writings still exists today. But these perfectly respectable sources are never on Christian lists of historical witnesses. They include important figures like Epictetus, Pomponius Mela, Martial, Juvenal, Seneca the Younger, Gallio, Seneca the Elder, Pliny the Elder, Plutarch, Justus of Tiberias, Philo of Alexandria, Nicolaus of Damascus and more. And these are just the contemporaries; there are still later commentators who we would expect to have mentioned Christ, but did not.

Believers are left with two unhappy choices: either the Gospels were grossly exaggerating Jesus’ life and accomplishments, and Jesus was just another illiterate, wandering preacher with a tiny following, completely unnoticed by society at large – or he was an outright mythical character. This is not a false dichotomy - outside of the Bible, there is no proof Jesus existed as he is portrayed in the Bible. None.
0 ups, 4w
Whatever dude
0 ups, 4w
LOL, “whatever dude”???
0 ups, 4w,
2 replies
Timeline of Supposed Eyewitnesses to Jesus: Born year Zero and died in 33

Flavius Josephus: 37 - c. 100
Clement of Rome: born ? – c. 98 - 102
Ignatius: c. 35 - 107
Pliny the Younger: c. 62 - 113
Suetonius: c. 75 - 160?
Tacitus: c. 55 - after 117
Polycarp: c. 69 - 155
Justin Martyr: c.114 -167
Lucian: c. 125 - 180
Clement of Alexandria: c. 150 - 211/216
Tertullian: c. 155 - 230
Origen: c.185 - c. 254
Cyprian of Carthage: c. 208 - 258
Eusebius: c. 235 - 339

As you can see, NONE, not a single one of these supposed witnesses were in any position to give a contemporary eyewitness account of the time in which Jesus supposedly lived, because none of them were even born yet during the period in question. And even the very earliest of these writings are nearly one hundred years after Jesus’ alleged birth. If that weren’t enough already, the fact is none of the so-called “testimonies” are very impressive. Few are even talking about Christ in any context. For the most part, they are discussing Christians, not Christ at all. The two that do (or just appear to) even mention Christ, namely those of Tacitus and Suetonius, are just snippets that happen to mention common Christian beliefs of their day in passing while actually discussing some other subject altogether, not making any grand pronouncements on Jesus’ historicity.
0 ups, 4w
Jesus is known to have existed by Christians, Jews, Muslims, and Atheists alike. Just because a few wacks wrote it doesn’t make it true
0 ups, 4w
“Known to have existed” yet no one contemporaneously wrote anything about him despite the anonymously written gospels claiming “his fame spread far and wide.” And those gospels were written several (3 to 7) decades later.
0 ups, 4w
That wasn't even meant to be interpreted as an insult
Elon Musk memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
D.O.G.E. IS OPPOSED BY ONLY FOUR GROUPS:; 1. Democrats 2. NGO Workers 3. NGO $$$ Recipients 4. Money laundering criminals; And in some cases, one person meets all four criteria!