Do this, draw 1 million dots. Color 350 of them the loveliest green you can find, then color 50 of them the deadliest red you know of. You will have created a scale model of the so called ideal level of 350 parts per million, and the catastrophic addition of 50 manmade parts per million. Then, get back to me with what you think.
Aw, what the hell. 400 ppm is what is called in science an "absurd" number. CO2 measures over 3500 ppm downwind of rainforests where more vegetative material is decomposing. It measures in the teens at the poles where there is no vegetative material. To say the worldwide CO2 average is 400 ppm is absurd. As for an average worldwide temperature, again it is absurd. The poles have been measured as low as negative 135 degrees F, Death Valley has been measured at 135 degrees, does that make the average temperature of the earth zero? No. A highly esteemed statistician told me that even if determining an average temperature of earth could be considered valid, it would require extended study of over a trillion data points to determine a meaningless number. I can go on, every valid science invalidates so called climate science. Look at what the offered solution is. It's a global problem they say, that requires a global government. Not thousands of independent scientists working, a single world government of politicians. Should trigger a BS alarm in you. Study the gas laws of physics for more proof.
