I might tend to agree that in one person's wise mind alone, the trial was a magical joke
The Judge in this case gives the instructions to the jury, right ?
Who here, has the legal credentials and responsibility to the public to accept the 2 guilty pleas ?
One might rebuke your deceptive attempts at mocking justice for you do not agree with the judge
What your asserting is that the perps didn't do it, or if they did do it, they ought get off on a technicality.
It is okay for you that they got away with a murder that they plead guilty to up front.
Maybe the trial on appeal by the prosecutor, for to follow proper legal procedure, found that the initial guilty pleas were binding. In that case, it'd be too bad they wasted a jury's time.
So, if one understands you correctly, they killed the guy with his own public patrol issued weapon, there exist no other suspects, yet they ought get off free as a bird, as you like what the possibly stacked biased jury decided, over what their own guilty pleas indicate.
Entering a plea is also our justice system, and also the law of the land. Whatever