Imagine having an ego this fragile

Thank you, WABC for rolling over and opening the door!

It almost amazes that this is being allowed to happen, but not really.

The Free Press is no longer.

ABC basically bribed him with $15 million so they could maintain access.

F**king little bitches.

Access to Trump or their FCC licenses?

ABC, Bezos, C..... ain't wait to see who else sells out to be part of Club Trump Oligarchy,,,

He said this?

He's doing it: https://apnews.com/article/trump-des-moines-register-lawsuit-polling-09698af51779943e13ffdc680e4fdbd5

Trump was already in a lawsuit with ABC before the election. It's one of the reasons they were so biased against him in the Kamala debate.
They caved in bc George Stephalanosos doesn't want investigations done on him and would rather just pay a settlement than expose how corrupt he is.
This is a man who asked Nancy Mace how she could stomach voting for a ra**ist like Trump (who has not been convicted of that btw), when he himself buried actual r**e cases against Bill Clinton and made sure all the women's stories about him never saw the light of day bc he wanted him in office so badly.
George is one of the most degenerate POS in modern media. The gall to pretend he cares about women after what he did is just sickening. This guy will do anything to promote who he wants.

Go back to your Nazi propaganda streams

A bit harsh maybe?

Probally

But given what you and the rest of us not of a certain contingent go through and witness here, I can see why...

Oh great, talking about how a corrupt media shill covered up r**e cases for a candidate he liked while calling a candidate he doesn't like a r**ist, pointing that out is Nazi propaganda?
You can't have open discussion anymore without someone throwing the Nazi word around.
This right here is why the left lost this election.

Yes he was, in 1973. In fact the only reason why anybody ever heard of Trump in the first place is because of that lawsuit for racial discrimination.
He violated the terms of agreement in 1975.

This topic didn't have anything to do with race, but since you mentioned that, it might interest you to know Trump had some racists on his Mar-a-Lago estate in the 90s, and because he didn't appreciate that, he sent them movies about how racism is harmful and bad and tried to educate them on being more inclusive. He also was looking to help start a 3rd party in the late 90s but left the party after David Duke joined because he thought David Duke was a disgusting human being.
Many things the left say about Trump make very little sense if you've actually watched him throughout history and not people's warped smear interpretations of him. For example, the idea that he's just power hungry for the sake of it make zero sense because anyone who was paying attention to Trump in the 90s knows that everyone was constantly asking him if he would ever run for president and almost trying to egg him on to, and he would have had a lot of support if he did back then. However, he didn't really want to. He said numerous times that he would only run if there was so much corruption that he felt the country needed it. And then he announced his candidacy a couple decades later in 2015 when he was nearly 70 years old. Why would an aspiring dictator wait until age 70 to run for office when he could've easily run at 40 or 50? You don't even have to live much longer than 70, especially with American diets.

He sent them movies? Who? And what movies?

Because this sounds like some urban legend bullshit to me.

The political party you referencing from the 90s? I think you mean the Reform party of the 2000s. In a press release, he would claim he was leaving the race because of people like David Duke.

A man he would later claim to have no knowledge of when Duke endorsed him in 2015.

Are you looking for names of the racists? They didn't say. They were the rich people in the Palm Beach golf course in the 90s. The people there were pissed he wanted to include Jews and blacks there, and he was pissed they had a problem with it and stuck to his guns about it, even though it was making it hard to get his golf course approved by the local town council, which was imposing restrictions on his bid.

He had his lawyer send every member of the town council copies of two classic movies about discrimination: ’A Gentleman’s Agreement,’ which is about a journalist who pretends to be Jewish to expose anti-Semitism, and ’Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner’ about a white couple’s reaction to their daughter bringing home a black fiancé.

He could have turned a blind eye to this, because it was not in the news. Instead, he fought back and won. Ever since, that golf course remains inclusive.

Trump has condemned David Duke within the last several years. Frankly I think it's dumb to ask him if he supports David Duke just bc Duke supported him. David Duke is irrelevant to the right. We don't care about him, and he's not influential enough to make a real mark on the country because we've gotten past public unashamed racism toward blacks (though I would argue we haven't solved racism 100% yet and I suspect we never will). Evil people have to support one side, and it doesn't mean that side is automatically evil. Should we go to Democrats and ask them if they support ISIS terrorists or Iran, who basically waited for Obama to win in 2012 so they could start bombing Israel? Should we assume Kamala is friendly to the ideas of Ilhan Omar because she supported her? If not, we should stop harrassing Trump about Duke. He clearly does not think much of him.

You should have kept reading the article you copy/pasted that from. Because it goes on to talk about how Trump pretended not to know who David Duke was, and only after several days, disavowed Duke and his endorsement.

And if Chron.com is the only source for this "he sent movies to rich people about how bad racism is" I'm gonna compare that to the Congressional testimony of Trump employees.

Who said that when Trump would walk through the casino floor, all the black employees would have to be pulled from their jobs, go stand in a room where he couldn't see them, and only returned to their jobs once he was gone.

And how they had to mark the job application of minority candidates with special codes.

You can read it here: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CREC-2016-09-26/html/CREC-2016-09-26-pt1-PgS6073-2.htm

Trump is racist AF, and your sourceless urban legend about him sending "racism is bad" movies to rich people doesn't disprove anything.

"Trump had some racists on his Mar-a-Lago estate in the 90s, and because he didn't appreciate that, he sent them movies about how racism is harmful and bad and tried to educate them on being more inclusive."

Oh my gosh, this is gem.
Teaches me to stop reading a comment halfway through the first sentence.

Do tell more. This is amazing.

So you don't believe it because it paints him in a positive light? Someone who worked for him back then said this. And if you want to say that he paid them to to help his political campaign, they said it decades ago before he was even into politics.

I don't believe in fantasies.
They have an unfortunate tendency to disrupt reality and that in turn tends to get confusing for people not exactly well gifted in the critical thinking department which in turn tends to harsh my mood as I have to pause and waste inordinate amounts of my time explaining every single little thing to them in order to indulge yet compensate for in a polite manner the 'creative impulses' that imbue their false narratives which thus leads to further disruption of reality and,,,

But hey, I'll play. Post it.

I'll wait.

So you just assumed something was a fantasy without even looking into it because someone you don't like did something that you would agree with. And your way to cover this up is to hide behind the words "critical thinking" while using the idea of "intelligence" to insult people for having information you don't like. As someone who actually has studied critical thinking, there is all sorts of "ill" to this logic. You have no idea how to argue. You just know big logical words and know how to throw them around but have no idea what they even mean. Using big words will automatically make you sound smart to people who don't know what big words mean. So I guess you probably "win" a lot of arguments this way.

However, "critical thinking" cannot always make you deduce the truth 100% percent of the time. You are not a fly on the wall in the life of any celebrity's life or Trump's life. You don't know everything that happened to him or everything he's done. And critical thinking will not make you know any details about it. Critical thinking would make you realize that you don't know that. Critical thinking would encourage an open mind. Critical thinking would mean reading both sides and seeing which makes more sense. The moment you turn off an idea because it paints someone you don't like in a positive light, critical thinking has been thrown out the window and replaced with bias. Conservatives like to call this "TDS" in this case.

Read my reply to whistlelock.

Guy, if "intelligence" and "smart" come to your mind about me when reading my drivel, then that's on you, not me. I didn't mention those words, you did.

I deal in facts, not arguments. Cuts out the middle man and saves me lots of time. And aspirin.

You're just dodging rather than posting anything to back up what you're saying which of course you didn't because you can't because it's fanfiction and thus not tetherered to reality in the slightest.

You're the one who mentioned critical thinking and went on a rant about how you have to correct people's creative impulses that imbue false narratives. Yet you didn't debunk anything I said, you just denied it on no grounds based on "i deal in facts, not fantasies".

You don't know the facts behind everything. Neither do I. There are some things we have to guess about. And there are somethings we have to research. To say "I deal in facts" is extremely arrogant. All you have to do is read something wrong and believe it and now you're going to say it like it's gospel truth. And when you're in an argument, you'll say "you don't argue, you just speak facts". Well guess what. Anyone can say that. Hitler could say it. Doesn't mean he didn't lie his head off to get in power.

I didn't dodge. I said read my reply to whistlelock. I already explained it.

Of course I didn't debunk anything you said, there was nothing to debunk. You posted an absurd falsehood and you've persisted in refusing to substantiate it despite multiple requests for you to do so.
Can't debunk something that's not there to debunk in the first place.

tl;dr

Gotta wonder how many are operating an account when they're not aware of what their own comment says.

It amazes me the same thing with OP memes, I've addressed quite a few where the OP was not aware of what the OP mean that they themselves are the op of was about.

Get back to me when the one I replied to reread the comment.
Oh, and one reply will suffice.

PS: I'm from New York City. I've forgotten more than you will never know about Trump before your parents were even born. Heck, I walked past his house in the 1970s in Jamaica Estates and didn't even know it was his.
So save the revisionist lectures for someone else.

Are you aware that passing someone's house doesn't mean you know everything about them? I've passed his Mar-a-Lago house before while on vacation, for your information.

Why bring my parents into this? My parents actually remember Trump before he was involved in politics and they knew the stuff the media says about him doesn't line up with what he actually did in their lifetimes, even though they didn't always support him (and I didn't always either, bc I knew he wasn't a traditional conservative and was a bit afraid he'd run to sabotage the Republican party and give Hillary the victory, a worry that was absolved the moment he called her out for covering up Bill's s3x crimes for her own political gain). And I knew the media was BSing on him hating women when he became the first candidate to appoint a woman to run his campaign advisory. (remember that 2016 phase where they sent about 500 letters in the mail with different ways of saying how "a girl's teen years are hard enough without a president who hates women"? [Btw this is why the left lost in 2024 too, Kamala kept saying the same debunked stuff about Trump. In 2020, they were able to blame Covid on him and they also deleted anything that harmed Biden's campaign off social media, so they had an advantage there. They weren't able to do the same anymore in 2024 bc Elon buying Twitter messed all of it up bc now anyone who censored information for harming the left's campaign would be seen through bc there was at least one way to access information that they couldn't buy. If Elon hadn't done that, the left would control all avenues of information. Heck, Mark Zuckerberg admitted they pressured him to censor information that would harm Biden's campaign.])

My parents are a quite a bit older than you think and one is also from NYC.

Fer ferk's sake, what part of "Heck, I walked past his house in the 1970s in Jamaica Estates and didn't even know it was his" did you not understand? That's the point. I didn't know. I didn't care. The people that we were visiting on a fairly regular basis didn't care enough to mention it to us. Maybe they didn't know, but they lived just a couple of blocks away, so who knows if they didn't know. Regardless the point is nobody gave a freaking ferk. It's Jamaica Estates. Lots of people with money live there. In fact, everybody that lives there has a lot of money. A lot.

If your parents had any even the slightest connection to here, or even anywhere else in America, they would have known back then that they didn't like Trump. I mean I really can't speak for them, but I can tell you this much that if they knew about him back then they didn't like him. No one did.

I cannot make out what you're saying with the rest of that. Because paragraphs are a thing for a reason. I can't tell who is he and her who what who that then that one said to this one because that one did that and then the other one did this other thing but then others also did something that whomever else did otherwise and then this one sent some letters and then something happened and then it was 2016 all over again in 2020 and then something else and does anyone not yet know that Kamala Harris has lost the race and the election is over and then does Hunter Biden and his illustrious laptop make his usual requisite appearance in this one or not quite yet?

The thing is, Trump isn't exactly a traditional Republican. He's actually far more progressive than most Republicans and was a registered Democrat for decades. He ran as a Republican because the Democrat party has gotten extremely corrupt (really both parties are but the Democrat party got taken over by the far left and isn't even welcoming to many traditional Democrats anymore). Elon Musk is not a traditional Republican either and voted Dem his entire life until this election, and he is not anti-abortion. What has united Trump and his cabinet is that the left has gone so far that criticism of them is not allowed, and because they're some of the few ppl with the balls to confront that, they've joined despite not agreeing on everything.

Heck, Oprah wrote a letter to Trump a few decades ago saying "consider me your VP if you ever run" (which is weird for her to do to a racist). Whoopi Goldberg called him a dear friend in 2011 during an appearance on the View. If he's known for racism, why were some of the most leftist black people in media today friends with him until he ran as a Republican? Something doesn't add up about that.

Trump has no ideology beyond doing what is best for him, and him alone. If 'you' benefit from something he does, good for you but he expects you to give him some of that success.

Which is really bad if he's involved in politics. A political party is a group of people who have similar or compatible ideas on governance.

Trump shares nothing with Republicans when it comes to governing. He ran as a republican because it was the easiest route to what he wanted to do- get more money. When Republicans stop being useful to him, he will cast them aside to move on to the next thing.

You have only to look at his entire personal life to see this. He dumped his wives as soon as they stopped being young and pretty enough for him. Anytime someone in his campaign or adminstration got into trouble. "I barely know the guy."

He's not conservative. He's not progressive. He's a narcisist that is only out for himself.

The people in politics that turned against him are the people he fired for being inefficient and they got butthurt. That's why they hate Elon too, bc he's even more efficient than Trump and he's gonna cut all of that out of the government. Do you know there are government officials who don't bother to show up to the WH except for maybe one day a month so they won't get fired, but they get a large paycheck out of YOUR work money? They work ONE day a month and then they take the money you make for working 5+ days a week and live comfortably while signing laws that screw you over financially and benefit them.

Liz Cheney is a war-monger who left Trump frankly bc he didn't have any wars in his tenure.

Another reason Trump is not a narcissist is because he doesn't talk about his best traits all the time. Sure, he says things like "i'm the greatest entertainer" but he doesn't talk about community service (which Kamala tried to fake and publicly televise), or the fact that he has helped businesses grow and charged nothing in return.

I would agree he's not 100% conservative or progressive, but he is probably closer to progressive. What he is is someone who saw corruption in the government and wanted to deal with it. That's why they hate him so much, that's why the media has come out against him so much.

And I think more details will come out soon, but I think there's some wild stuff going on in the government that makes even the left's Trump fantasies look tame. I doubt it was an accident that every Diddy party guest came out in support of Kamala in droves even if just months prior they had either backed off from politics altogether or straight up lambasted the Biden campaign (like Cardi B, who famously went on a rant about how Biden is mishandling pricing, before having a scripted Kamala endorsement that she needed her phone to remember). The FBI has been tied directly to both Diddy and Epstein, and when Trump said he planned on releasing both of those lists, he immediately made a lot of enemies in the celebrity and billionaire club. It's possible that a lot of our progressivism over the last 20 years has been engineered by our government by getting billionaires and celebrities hooked in s3x parties and then blackmailing them to push agendas. If that's actually the case, our government is more corrupt than even Trump knew in 2015.

Congratulations, you just described Kamala Harris. And that's why she lost, because she was so obvious about it that anyone could see it unless they had so much TDS that she was going to be an angel no matter what she was.

Isn't that business anyway? A boss gives you a job, and you both benefit? If it's a regular job, you get a paycheck, and if it's a start up, you both can get more money from it over time?

Also, that's just plain not true anyway. Trump has helped fund businesses by giving people loans, and when the business takes off and the person comes to pay him back the loan, he's torn up the contract and told them to enjoy their success. Trump loves to see people he knows succeed. Heck, some of his friends have tried to get jobs at news stations and told him that they can only get the job if they smear him, and he tells them to get the job anyway if it's the best opportunity for them.
Even in his own businesses, whenever he came to a place he owned, he would always shake every employee's hand and ask them if something was going on that he should know about.

That's funny to say that he ran to get more money. Bill Clinton and Barack Obama's net worths multiplied by a long shot after they were in the WH. Trump actually lost money during his 4 years.
wdym by cast to the side? You mean he won't run 5 times until he dies, like the left claims he will?

Nobody's defending him dumping his wives, but that is a pretty common problem in America right now. Are you saying that everyone who dumps girls like Leo DiCaprio is a narcissist?

If you actually look at his personal life and not what people said about him the moment he ran as a republican, you'll see a very different picture of him than what the left makes him out to be. His family is actually extremely mature (unlike Biden who has a 50yo crack addict son who had to get nepo pardoned bc his father's the president). Most of the people that worked with him have very good things to say about how he ran things.

Matter of fact, he didn't care about running for office even though people constantly asked him to. He constantly answered he would only run if he felt the government was so corrupt it needed fixing. And he ran in his 70s. An ambitious power horde similar to Hitler would not wait until he was 70 to run for office.

My bad, I skimmed through this a little bit and realized that what you're posting is actually satire.
Egg on my face, I didn't realize you were joking.

Trump gives people loans, and then tears up the contract when they come to repay him? Classic.
4095 legal suits in his lifetime, and none had anything to do with the countless people he stiffed over the decades. Sure, ok

Trump profited some 3.65 billion dollars while in office. Something like that.

Of course Trump isn't a Republican. He's only using them as a vehicle for political purposes.

Guy switches parties like it was Musical Chairs at an Ivanka birthday bash way back when.

It came became pretty obvious soon enough that he would get nowhere politically with the Democratic Party, as he was always looked at as a joke, hence why he never ran for local or state office. He left the Reform Party at Jesse ventures urging on account of Pat Buchanan being toxic for his rep and ensuing chaos.

His earlier dipping of toes into the Republican party was also laughed at, but between Birtherism and then the building a campaign around pumping racist tropes in 2015, well, we know the rest.

He's only using them as a vehicle for political advancement*

Jesse Ventura*