weird how their reaction isn't consistent.

I keep coming back to the Penny verdict, which seems to ratify the idea that it's okay for a private citizen to decide that someone is a problem in the public space and kill them to "solve" the problem. How is that different from what CEO shooter did, except that strangling someone slowly is definitely a torture death compared to shooting them?

If the "problem" is black and/or poor, it's okay to murder them.

Lol

Bro Kyle Rittenhouse was being chased by 3 white criminals. And the evidence that his defense put forth clearly showed that he shot in self defense. You should consider checking your sources.

You're comparing shooting someone in self defense to the assassination of a CEO with a wife and kids for political reasons.

Oh, what unverified claims did I make?

Since the guy printed his weapon and accessory, could it be the differential outrage is due to nobody making any money off a gun sale? Just sayin'...