Libs: Guns are GOOD!

So an assassination of a person is the same someone stopping a lunatic that is threatening peoples lives ? Tell me you are not being serious with this comment.

Libs will tell you if a pregnant woman is murdered, her killer should be charged with a double homicide. But if she gets an abortion, that's different...

First, let me ask you this: do you believe abortion is murder? This is relevant, I swear

when we consider that women are treated as property, it is degrading to women that we should treat our children as property to be disposed of as we see fit — Elizabeth Cady Stanton (sufferagette on abortion)
Every woman knows that if she were free, she would never bear an unwished-for child, nor think of murdering one before its birth. Victoria Woodall, first female candidate for President.
“The gross perversion and destruction of motherhood by the abortionist filled me with indignation, and awakened active antagonism.” Elizabeth Blackwell — First woman Medical Doctor

I think Woodall puts it best out of your three quotes. Like I said before, I think we need to research alternative procedures that let the baby live while not interfering with the mother’s life.

But that’s never gonna happen while so many politicians get their votes from the issue. It’s a disgusting reality.

LoL , Jeez I feel all eyes on me right now, no, I do not think it is "murder", However it
IS ending a life. Medical necessity removes the murder aspect in my opinion, however, if someone is celebrating abortion and getting them on pupose to prove a point, then that could be akin to murder.

Well, my point was that the UnitedHealthcare CEO has surely funded non medically necessary abortions through his company. Wouldn’t that make him a murderer by proxy? And his shooter, therefore, someone stopping a lunatic threatening lives?

Would that make him a murderer by proxy? Not necessarily. In a myopic situation where it would become necessary to save the mother’s life (something no state is banning) it’s a life-saving procedure. That; however, is less than 1% of reasons why abortions are done. More than 99% are elective procedures — meaning they were not necessary.

No, not at all. He wasn't threatening women to get abortions. He was provding a service to them, Neely was threatening to kill people riding the train to work. Come on , not even in the same universe ,- let alone similar circumstance.

So basically to him child murder was “just business”?

That somehow makes him seem even more deranged

The only reason you are trying to justifiy this is becuase a white man stopped a black lunatic and now you are looking for anything to hold against any conservative. Its a very bad hill to try to defend. The CEO was shot in the back without warning, for nothing, he didn't know the shooter - he didn't do anything to him personally. Btw , are you calling abortion "child murder"..?

Yes I am calling it child murder. Surprised?

Yes, exponentially surprised. Anyway, that is your opinion, the women who had abortions that were paid for by his insurance company did not have the same opinion as you. That means no one was threaten or blakc mailed or anything else. Neely got what he had coming to him, and the outrage from his family is as fake as fake gets, if they loved him so much why didn't anyone give a f**k about him for the last nine years when no one seen or heard from him?