Shallow

You keep claiming that, but your opponents GIVE examples while you are HIDING them.

The communist that lives under the bridge next town over is a better advocate for communism than you.

Again, an empty statement. A literal statement of blind faith.
You are advocating more for Theocracy than Communism.

What does that mean? That you kill more counterrevolutionaries than last time?

Yet when we tell you to give us a place where it actually worked, you say it doesn’t exist. So what real examples fid you look at?

So, you can’t name a single location. Got it

Kibbutzes in Israel, Jewish commune villages in rural Argentina...

But it only works on the small scale like those places. Also the ones in Argentina have been shrinking in recent years as younger folks move to the cities looking for better opportunities.

Looking for better opportunities

So, seems like once again you haven’t shown any place that it works

You replied to the wrong comment.

You aren’t Ari…dang all this time I was seeing his posts and yours as the same poster

Yeah, sure, ok, ya got me, that's me, uh huh, like, totally. I joined this site in 2016 when I was still in kindergarten.

Good grief.

Name ONE

What "gatherings"

Capitalism is the voluntary exchange of goods, no harm is necessary. Communism need to forcible take away goods that are used for production, which hurts people. You're evil and want to feel morally superior, so you lie to yourself.

The rich don't force to get that money, or it'll fall outside the definition of capitalism. Your thinking of something for like kleptocracy, imperialism, or despotism. Ironically country sized attempts and communism end with these three government types rather than what you want.

Again even though you don't bother with the facts you don't like.
capitalism
: an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market.

So what I describes is not mutualism, as I believe those that create value should be allowed to accumulate wealth for that creation via the voluntary exchange of goods. That is itself capitalist. As it is the USA is supposed to be free market, so groups can get together and voluntarily follow the system they wish, communists couldn't property argue against this so the came up with the term capitalism to be against and lied about the system.

Nope, that isn't capitalism your describing. Anyone can own the means of their own production in capitalism, and people are free to choose whom they do commerce with or it falls outside the definition. You have never offered a single thing that says otherwise, but resort to assuming the conclusion you wish and proof by assertion.

And thanks for saying you wish to take the product of my own work from me to feed others, maybe one day you'll understand that get when trade isn't done by free will, it's done by force. You keep telling me freedom is slavery and thus I should be a slave owned by the collective in order to be free.

No, it doesn't work for the same reasons communism and socialism don't work.

How does it hurt others?

"Making food less safe to cut costs hurts people." Which is why RFK is a huge bonus to Trump's victory.
"Destroying nature for profit hurts everyone" Logging companies plant more trees than any other organizations on the planet. If nature was left 100% intact, we would be living in the stone age, and you wouldn't have two homes to post ignorant memes from.

Because if food was free, you would be forcing everyone who produces it into slavery

"Making money off of someone else's work hurts them." If you're so entitled that you'd never be satisfied with any reasonable wage, start your own business.

Start your own company then so you can keep 100% of your labor value

You don't pay for the supplies to make the product, or the taxes on the building you make the product in