He'll change the rules once they get going

Oh, Viki... questions of fake ID/no fake ID are irrelevant; if you consensually stick your junk in a minor it's STATUTORY rape. How do you not know that? And regardless of whether you do or don't, why are you clearly going to bat for someone your own comment indicates you believe is a pedophile?

Thanks for demonstrating you don't actually object to pedophilia unless it gives you a political bludgeon, Viki.

If you notice, the style is different from the poster;s usual, so having posted a c/p without reading it would seem probable,,,

Yup. But still, I'm interested in riding this out, curious to see where it goes. 🤔

That's one of the reasons I typically don't do links, they often weren't even read by the ones posting them, often contradicting them, no less.

Shocker that you'd cite an unreliable source as counter to another unreliable source... points for consistency, I guess...

But none of that is important, Viki, because we're not talking about what your known purveyor of propaganda and rightwing biased commentary said nor are we talking about what The View said, no... we're talking about what you said.

Specifically:
"The DOJ did not close its case against Matt Gaetz until October 2022. They never publicly acknowledged why he was not charged although it becomes fairly obvious once you learn that Joel Greenberg had produced fake IDs for the underage girl in question."

^^^^^ Yeah, that. That right there.^^^^ So now that we've established you're defending someone you believe is a pedophile, care to explain yourself?

Turn on comments on your posts. I'll argue with the people in your comments. I hate Trump too.

I appreciate the offer, your desire to support but I don't hate Trump -there's no point to it; he doesn't care and it just poisons one's psyche.

Yes... you don't want to acknowledge innocent until proven guilty... lynch mob is your thing...

what with the whole accidentally letting slip you believe Matt Gaetz is pedophile while trying to defend said same thing.

As far as "innocent until proven guilty" goes, which would you rather: "Matt Gaetz has his day in court for the prosecution to present their case to a jury" or "The issue of Matt Gaetz's potential Adventures in Neverland are quietly swept under the rug"?

LMAO... the fedsurrection???

OMG

I get that you need to throw whatever you think is going to stick at the wall in an effort to change the subject, distract from having let slip you believe Matt Gaetz is a pedophile -but seriously? The "fedsurrection" bullshit again?

Okay, prove it. Show me proof... not allegation, not insinuation -proof.

And when you're done uselessly flailing around, repeating weak conspiracy theory talking points that we both know I'm going to rip to shreds, will you then be ready to explain why you're going to bat for someone you've demonstrated you believe is a pedophile?

LMAO... you're the one who brought up the fedsurrection...

"Thanks for admitting you brought it up first... LOL"

So that's an "I'm never going to explain why I'm defending someone I've acknowledge is a pedophile" then?

"LMAO... you're the one who brought up the fedsurrection..."

Nope. You made it about lynch mobs, I cited a lynch mob. Matters of "fedsurrection" are purely of your own injection. Nice try, though, liar.

Now, are you ready to explain why you're defending someone you demonstrated you believe is a pedophile yet or are you going to keep up your pathetic scrambling to avoid the question?

Thanks for admitting you brought it up first... LOL