Pro-Russia, pro Syria. Welcome to the Fascist States of America. Again, where's the FBI background check?

And yet Putin's already working on getting his butt out of Ukraine and Trump's not even in office yet. Hoe exactly is Trump Putin's tool again?

Because with trump in power, putin has no reason to be in Ukraine. He'll get whatever he wants.

Trump wants full capitulation from Ukraine. Putin just has to sit back and wait for his sycophant to do his bidding. Putin didn't invade while trump was president, because trump was still doing what he was told. Explain why trump violated the Presidential Records Act at least 16 times with Putin?

Exactly.

I suspect putin invaded in order to put pressure on Biden and make him look weak, and he might withdraw now in order to make trump appear strong and competent.

Now who's talking conspiracy theories? (Cause my comments just got deleted for "conspiracies").

Also that makes no sense. Either of them could die. Trump's already almost 80 years old, and TDS has people actively trying to end his life. Plus, if 81M people really did show up to fire Trump in 2020, there'd have been little reason for him to hope for Trump to gain a second term.
Then there's this question: if Trump and Putin both wanted him to be America's dictator for life like the Democrat media claims, then would Putin wait until after he changed the laws to make himself dictator, and then go invade more countries? What if Trump had won in 2020 and made himself dictator for life? Would he have refrained or would he have felt safe invading other countries? If what you're saying is true, Putin is the dumbest invader of all time.

Who says Hitler and Stalin had the only two means to global domination? Война нового поколения!

did i say that? I just said they had the same goal, but two different tactics.

One tactic would be to threaten to send nukes to every spot on the planet if the whole globe doesn't declare you its new supreme leader. Neither Hitler nor Stalin had access to that kind of tactic, and it's a horrible tactic anyway bc that would pollute the whole planet and harm that leader in the process.

I hope no one gets that idea though.

No he's not.

In fact the latest is that he's bringing it North Koreans because he's running out of prisoners willing to be soldiers.

Bro where did you even find that

Even Zelensky said today that the war will end faster with Trump in office
And Hamas has also said they're ready to negotiate peace

I didn't find it anywhere. It's your bogus claim. It's nowhere to be found.

well then how did i just find these 4 things within seconds of looking them up?

And? Where does Putin say that he's getting out?

negotiating peace talks? he ain't having peace if he stays in

Of course he is, just like he was talking about having peace talks this summer. Then, as now, that would until Ukraine ceding territory over to Russia.

What, you're claiming that he's going to just up and leave with nothing?

If someone with a spine is in office and tells him to leave or the US will intervene, he will. Putin doesn't want to fight us. He wouldn't beat us. (Well maybe now he might because Biden's administration made our military so much of a joke that they're essentially begging people to enlist - but with Trump that would not last long). Ofc our leadership rn has no interest in stopping the war, so that's why he doesn't take us seriously. Sending hundreds of billions of dollars to Ukraine won't do jack, and Putin knows it. Zelensky just takes that money for himself, does nothing to help their suffering people at the border, and then plays victim and asks for more money. Anyone who tries to expose this, he uses his billions to manipulate it so they're immediately deplatformed so their words won't ever see the light of day. He doesn't give a damn about the suffering of his own people, so Putin doesn't fear our money going to him because it won't strengthen his opposition. Trump wouldn't just funnel our entire funds to Ukraine. That doesn't work.

Did you know that Trump is the only one out of the last 4 US presidents to not have a Putin invasion occur during his tenure? They happened under Bush, they happened under Obama, and they happened under Biden. But not Trump. Bc Putin knows Trump won't let it fly. Trump had ZERO wars in his tenure. Zero. That's why the Cheneys don't like him. They're war mongers, and 20 years ago, the same ppl championing them as "objective conservatives" today called them fascists then.

Because one really impressive spine is all it takes to stop the Russians!

Something something... the usual QAnon fanfic...

Yeah, Bush invaded Afghanistan and Iraq and so therefore Putin wasn't scared of him!
Bush dangled Georgia the possibility of joining NATO, and that and the South Ossetia situation made Russia invade in 2008. For a whooping 5 entire days.

Same thing happened during Obama, Ukraine was offered the possibility of joining NATO, and then there came that invasion.

In 2016 on the campaign trail Trump promised to push the Russian forces out of Ukraine. He didn't even try. In fact in his first days in office - and I'm talking first week here, if not the very first day - Trump tried to rescind sanctions placed by the Obama Administration against Russia and return property owned by Russian operatives that was confiscated by them. Throughout his years in office, Trump repeatedly attempted to stop further sanctions placed against Russia, and was just basically forced to by Congress.

John Bolton stated that Putin was waiting for a 2nd by Trump in order to invade Ukraine after Trump pulled out of NATO. Since that didn't happen, he went ahead with this plan invasion anyways.

Since then, Trump called Putin a genius for the current invasion of Ukraine, invited Russia to invade actual NATO members, and had stated that there is no more Ukraine.

Is this spine you're talking about cartilogenous, or...?

Putin also didn't try to invade Ukraine during Trump's first tenure.

If Putin wanted to invade ukraine but a different president was in office, you don't think he'd rethink it? Especially if it were a president that supposedly wasn't kissing his butt like y'all say Trump is? Putin won't mess with the US because we're stronger than Russia.

Also, they said the same thing about how Biden handled the Afghanistan Taliban situation, but the thing is that they don't tell you how these things were done. Biden just pulled troops out of Afghanistan immediately and left $80M worth of American war equipment behind for the Taliban to seize, and the media was like "well Trump was setting up leave Afghanistan first, so this was technically his deal and his fault", like no it wasn't. He wasn't going to leave like that.

You do realize that in the exact same conversation where he said Putin was a genius for invading ukraine, he said that it would never have happened if he were president, and said it was genius because Putin was dealing with a weak president?

No, the spine I'm referring to saw less bomb creations by all of our enemies, including Iran, Russia, and North Korea (and in 2021, both Iran and North Korea both suddenly began building their biggest bombs in development since Trump shut down some big bombs they were making in early 2017).

Do you have any reason why this wasn't Trump's fault or it was actually Trump's fault that they suddenly got resumed the year he left office? Do you have any reason it's his fault China became the first country to become wealthier than us in over 100 years - the year he left office, and the same year the economy went to pot? Or is everything bad his fault? Because that is the definition of TDS.

"Biden's administration made our military so much of a joke that they're essentially begging people to enlist"

Bullshit.

bro back in 2022 i'd never gotten so much mail begging you to join the military. it was crazy.
Plus I know several senior war veterans personally. The military today is not the military they grew up in.

I tend to dislike repeating myself unnecessarily when my comment is right there to be read, no less.

But since you insist, again, Trump promised in 2016 that he would drive Russia out of Ukraine. Instead he attempted to rescind sanctions placed against them.
Putin was waiting for Trump's second term when he was going to withdraw the US from NATO and then Russia would invade the rest of Ukraine.

Ukraine is not in the United States of America. Russia did not invade the United States of America. Geography is a thing.

Trump went to North Korea in 2019 to meet with Kim Jong-Un, something no American president would ever do. Upon leaving the meeting he immediately ceased joint military exercises with South Korea, and wanted to pull the United States out of the DMZ.

As you can see from the chart, Kim got quite busy testing in 2017, including a 6th nuclear test.

Trump refused to renew the Iran nuclear deal and it was after that they resumed their nuclear bomb program.

In 2020, in a meeting that did not include a single representative of the Afghan government that we had crafted for two decades, Trump had authorized signing over Afghanistan to the Taliban, the very terrorists that US soldiers have been fighting for 20 years.

71h9c8.jpg (click to show)

bro how can you even say that? That is a massive stretch bc you're just projecting stuff will happen in the future because you don't like a candidate. There is no reason based on past events to think that Trump hates Jews besides him being compared to Hitler constantly. But when we look at his record, he has stood for Jews in ways no president has ever done before.
In fact, that summation of 2 Thess 2 that you pulled up quite literally describes today's Democrats. They have constantly pretended to care about Jews (with the purpose of pretending to be good while they call all of us Nazis). That is the only reason they've cared for Israel - to "prove" they aren't Nazis. But when a racist group of Hamas terrorists pull a Putin on their border on a no-tech holiday and beat the s**t out of Israeli women & children, if Israel strikes back in self-defense, suddenly the left takes the side of the terrorists. The terrorists that have openly said "Hitler knew how to deal with these people" (referring to the Jews). The Dems are the ones who have faked friendship with Israel. They're the ones that turned on Israel.

Also 2 Thessalonians' description has nothing to do with Trump. 2 Thessalonians 2:4 says the person will exalt himself above every so-called god or object of worship and take his seat in the temple of God, displaying himself as being God. Trump is a bit arrogant, I'll give you that, but nowhere near that arrogant.

Then, 2 Thessalonians 2:11-12 says that God will send upon them a deluding influence so they will believe what is false, and they will be judged because they didn't believe truth, but took pleasure in wickedness. Who do we know right now that is pushing anti-biblical agendas? The LGBTQ movement is described as wickedness in the Bible, but many not only take pleasure in it, but are ready to enact violence if you don't accept it. The Bible says that in the end times, people will persecute Christians and think they're doing a good thing. This is how it starts. Not with Trump. It comes from the left. Because the left is a branch of an ideal that was started by someone who claimed the very thing 2 Thessalonians 2:4 warned about. This man, Karl Marx, claimed that God did not exist, thus man must fill the role we assume God plays.

And the left is also becoming Islam-friendly, and Islam governments hate both Christians and Jews. And the Bible prophesies about their persecution of Christians. Trump is once again, not affiliated with this.

I'm not your brother.

And to close, 2 Thessalonians 2 quite literally says nothing about someone bringing world peace. But nice try trying to rewrite a passage describing the antichrist to fit a description of Trump.

Shove it up your ass. I'm through with trumpsuckers.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/maga-violent-threats-spike-little-211816787.html

MAGA can burn in hell. F**k trump and everyone who voted for him.

So now that that bubble was burst, now you're just saying he's a violent racist r***ist? The Stormy Daniels case wasn't even r**e, in her own words on Bill Maher's show in 2018.
And just because Trump meets someone doesn't mean he agrees with them. He has openly said white supremacists and neo-Nazis "should be condemned totally". He's also met with Kim Jong Un who aligns with him on nothing politically.

Well for someone who just quoted scripture, that sounds like a very Christ-like thing to say...

Here's a question I have for you. Of the two of us, which one is being more violent? I'm not even mad. I'm just trying to explain things. Because from what I've seen, the left has brainwashed the public, and so I want to help the public understand things. I don't hate them for disagreeing with me. The left are the ones saying "f**k all you Trump voters, I don't ever want to see you again"
And if you think it's a matter of freedoms being taken away, Democrats have been very anti-church in the last 10 years. If they get the Christian population minimal enough to where our vote doesn't determine elections, they will likely try to kill us, as far-left-wingers usually do to people of a religious denomination that requires worship to someone other than the leader. Rn, the Christian vote does matter, which is why Kamala showed up to a sermon and preached right after kicking some people out of her rally for saying "Jesus is Lord".

We have things to fear, just like the left fears Trump. But a majority of us don't go around acting like the left does about Trump. We believe the world has been brainwashed and we want to help the people, not tell them to go force themselves.

My hope is that all these people freaking out over Trump's victory will see in about a year from now, when none of their fears come true, that the media completely lied to them about Trump. I don't want all these tiktok people making themselves into meltdown memes to stay terrorized forever. They should be freed from our government's lies.
Heck, Charlemagne tha god is a paid shill and even he's starting to question some of their narratives.

A government that hates its own people and orchestrates Diddy and Epstein freakoffs - those are the people that can go f themselves.

Trump is a rapist. He has been found liable in a civil court for exactly that. New York law calls it something else, but if it had been a criminal case, it would have been sexual assault.

Those people were not kicked out for saying "Jesus is Lord" at a Harris rally. They were heckling Harris, they got kicked out, and on the way out one of them shouted Jesus Is Lord.

And, yeah, a lot of people are going no-contact with Trump supporters because you voted for a convicted felon, rapist, insurrectionist.

Why would anyone want to hang around someone who supports someone like that?

The problem is Kamala dodged a lot of live interviews and then only showed up on obviously edited ones. Trump showed up on Joe Rogan and absolutely nothing was clipped or edited (and Kamala dodged that). This is one reason Trump won. We know who Trump is by watching him. We can spend time watching Kamala for weeks. We will never know her true self, because she's actively made sure of that. Her positions change constantly. We can't tell if she's lying or if she's changed. If we elect her, we have zero idea what is walking in the WH. We have no idea what she will do. So it's not a stretch to imagine that most Americans didn't trust her with their vote.

So am I justified in cutting off all my Dem voters who voted for people who are flooding our country with millions of illegals, prioritizing those illegals over us (and thus screwing us over financially while the economy already was at record lows), forcing Christians to spend taxpayer dollars on multiple progressive agendas they don't even support, and sending over $300B in total to Ukraine [that comes from OUR money and not theirs], AND sending our best source of outside income to Russia and then making up for that deficit by taxing the American people more? These politicians have zero interest in our well being and their whole campaign is "You BETTER vote for me bc you're the devil if you vote against me bc our opponenet is an evil monolith". Do you think this will end with Trump? Anyone else who threatens their agenda will become just as evil as they make Trump out to be. They already claim JD Vance is worse than Trump and they ain't got any cases or reasons against him yet (probably bc they haven't had the time to fabricate one yet since he's so new to being the VP candidate). They HATE Vivek bc he calls out woke BS, and they HATE DeSantis for the same reason. Anyone who calls out their insanity gets made into the next Hitler. It's blatant fear-mongering.

Our government is a literal crime syndicate.

by your logic, who would want to hang around someone who supports a crime syndicate?

In a civil court where the judge admittedly has massive TDS and has sued Trump 100 times by his own admission. In a civil court where the judge's daughter had money on the outcome of the court and stood to make millions if Trump was found guilty (and this got busted before the court was even done). In a court that ignored video evidence of the "victim" having a completely different idea of the incident and going so far as to say she wasn't even a victim. Several years ago, the media and Stormy herself ran this story as an affair. Now it's being run as r**e. In a court that had absolutely zero transparancy with the public (ik they don't usually have transparancy but if you're going to indict a president as a convicted felon, I think the public deserves to know how you came to that conclusion - that way you don't end up just BSing a court and then half the nation is like "guy's a r*pist bc the court said so", which was probably what they wanted). They threatened to jail Trump before the conviction if he even dared mention anything about anything in that court. Everything about that court was shady af, they tried to let us know as little as possible.
And the case was so bogus that Trump would likely have been able to appeal it and win the case - he just would have had to wait until after the election so it didn't ruin the campaign time he had left after they wasted it. The whole point was to get him labeled a felon to make one more thing that would scare off voters, since Biden's approval rating was in the dumps.

That wasn't "heckling". All they did was say "abortion is a sacrement to Satan" and "Christ is King" before saying "Jesus is Lord". Kamala said they were at the wrong rally. Then she realized that may have screwed her with pastoral endorsements and so she showed up in church a week later. Even though she has very anti-God stances on abortion and many other topics (as most democrats do, and she's even more far-left than freaking Bernie Sanders for crying out loud). That "anti-immigration bill" that her and Walz kept repeatedly saying that Trump killed (which would admit that he has more power out of office than they do inside it), that bill solved nothing and would've still let 1500 illegals in a day. It was so bad even Bernie voted against it. And Bernie ain't one of "Trump's buddies".

So ig it's fine to go no-contact with family members based on what you believe about the candidate they voted for. So should conservatives go no-contact with Biden or Kamala supporters then? There's some shady stuff in that Ashley Biden diary (which the FBI raided a house to confiscate and then bury, and I bet they'll destroy it Hillary-style right before Trump gets in office). Half the stuff the Biden administration has used the DOJ and the legal departments to do has been extremely illegal, but no one will hold them accountable to the law because... they ARE the law. Merrick Garland should be prosecuted but he'd just reject any case brought against him bc he has the power to do that. The Biden administration legit sent the FBI to raid their political opponent's house multiple times to collect things that may incriminate both Trump and Biden, to incriminate Trump and bury it if it were related to them (and once they did it with armed weaponry and busted into Barron's room). The Obama administration wiretapped into Trump's campaign in 2016, but no courts were brought up about that, even though it was illegal af.

Heck, I've even seen people push to abolish the electoral college, bc according to them, it's what gives Republicans a chance to win elections. And that's ridiculously unconstitutional.

The answer is we need to be exposed to each other's ideas. We need to watch the things both the candidates say and the things they do so we can discern things ourselves. We need community to explain things to each other. We need diversity of opinion. The left hates that, because investigation will require watching both sides objectively which would expose the fact that they lie constantly. I have watched Trump, Vance, Walz, and Kamala all speak many times, and the media's claims are not accurate.
Trump is not compassionless - rather, the opposite is true. He's actually quite funny and is a walking meme. The problem is humor gets you canceled now. The other problem is that the media will take a 5 second clip of something he says out of context and then use it to say he's radical. So on Joe Rogan, he said Robert E Lee had great generals. If you watched the whole discussion (which I did), you'd know he specifically said that he didn't agree with what they stood for, and he was explicitly talking about the generals' war strategies. The media clipped that and tried to say he supports the confederates and supports slavery.
Vance is not weird, he's actually the most intelligent politician I've ever seen. He doesn't let interviewers change subjects on him and he's extremely articulate, and is much better than Trump (who is a bit egotistical at times and isn't always the best communicator, even though he is one of the best at getting a crowd going).
Kamala has been covered for by the media (as was busted by a 60 minutes employee) and she quite literally says the exact same things every time she's in an interview - she has mastered the ability to use as many words to say as little as possible. If you asked Kamala why the sky is blue, she would likely respond with something like this: "The color that we perceive when looking upward at the sky comes across to us as blue, because when we look at the clear sky, the haze gives off what comes off to us as very blueish" (and it would likely contain a bunch of "umms" and "uhhs"). That is an assessment from watching her herself, not right-wingers covering her and clipping little sections out. The CNN and 60 Minutes interviews were infuriating.
Of the 4, Walz is the weirdest. He comes off as someone who is always begging you to sympathize with him, but in an extremely fake way. Kind of like how Kamala's cackle comes off as a way to laugh off extreme dishonesty (just like her stutters and speech patterns).