Imgflip Logo Icon

Zero rights have been lost

Zero rights have been lost | If you really need help, please contact a support group but…. You have lost; 0; ZERO rights since Tuesday | image tagged in the count,politics,memes | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
795 views 47 upvotes Made by Richiecunningham 3 weeks ago in politics
40 Comments
6 ups, 3w,
1 reply
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
And for black people who are really broken up about this
4 ups, 3w
ARRIVEDERCI!
4 ups, 3w
3 ups, 3w
Only one of those numbers is legit.
[deleted]
1 up, 3w,
2 replies
0 ups, 3w
Chase Oliver | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
it would look more like this
also, your word choice is abysmal. please reconsider your choices if you hate people for loving who they want to love and being who they want to be
0 ups, 3w
Uhh those who voted for Trump where severely undereducated as the tables show. Also you might wanna consider yoe word choice and get off your high horse there buddy
5 ups, 3w,
1 reply
yes... speaking of lame ducks

imgflip.com/i/99xxn8
2 ups, 3w,
2 replies
Yes... America voted against democrats who weaponized the judicial system to go after their political opponents... duh... that's why those crooked people involved with it are all running for cover now...
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Is it weaponization if the accusations are true? Which they are?
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
But they weren't... these cases should have never been brought... They only brought them for political motives... If you can't be honest... SMH
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Everyone has a tell when they’re lying. Yours are those ellipses of yours.

And you’re not even brave enough to admit it, are you?
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Sure... that's why those lawfare cases are all now melting away... the only stench left is on democrats for wasting tens of MILLIONS of taxpayer dollars on their ludicrous attempts to keep their political rival from running for office...
0 ups, 3w,
2 replies
And I’m sure that Government department for so-called efficiency won’t waste a single dollar either.

For the tonally inept, that was sarcasm
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Yes... can't try new solutions to fix these problems... that's why libs support the corrupt status quo.
0 ups, 3w
The problem isn’t a new solution itself, it’s the details. Putting Elon Musk in charge of it… might as well put Sonic the Hedgehog on assigning Speed Limits to country roads while you’re at it!
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Yes... you think career politicians are better suited to trim the fat off the US government... they've done so well with it for decades... LOL
0 ups, 3w
I never said that. Don’t put words into my mouth.

But Musk is the opposite of efficient. Look at how he bought a social media site for $44B just to run it into the ground.
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Do you think our government should act on data found in the tabloids?
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
Do you think the government should infringe on First Amendment rights by labeling speech they don't agree with Misinformation?
0 ups, 3w,
2 replies
What kind of answer is that?
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
What kind of question was yours? You didn't even clarify "data"
0 ups, 3w,
2 replies
Let me rephrase then, do you think that tabloids are reliable for information?
0 ups, 3w,
2 replies
Of course, you don't want to address the elephant in the room... labeling opposing arguments misinformation is all you ever will have... btw... did you just miss the FBI raid on Polymarket??
0 ups, 3w
I'm not asking about labeling opposing arguments misinformation. I'm not asking about any FBI raids. I'm asking you a simple question: should we rely on tabloids, or should we set standards on what sort of news our government taps for information? This question can be posed both to the left and the right. It is an unbiased question. If you like, we can talk about different news outlets after you answer and why they should/shouldn't be considered. But, I'd like you to just answer the question.
0 ups, 3w,
3 replies
So what's a tabloid? ABC? MSNBC?? CBS??? Washington Post???? LA Times?????

You do know that all those "news" organizations are now facing major overhauls by their owners to repair their images and make them "unbiased" in their efforts to report news going forward???
1 up, 3w
It’s telling that every time I ask a straightforward question, you scramble to dodge it with deflections, as if you're too afraid to give a real answer. Instead of engaging in an actual discussion, you hide behind cheap tactics, dancing around the point rather than addressing it head-on. If you had the confidence or clarity to back up your stance, you wouldn’t need to sidestep and play word games. So, what are you really afraid of?
0 ups, 3w
Of course, hypocrites do not want to address the lib MSM propaganda machine... they've lied so many times without any repercussions whatsoever...
0 ups, 3w
What's a tabloid? You're right, I should have defined what tabloid is and any other ambiguous terms. So, once again, let me rephrase the question once more so that you might finally answer it:

Do you think that any branch of government should create legislation through (but not limited to) laws made in congress, ruling by any Judicial court, Executive Order or otherwise, on the basis of information presented by any source of journalism whose business model follows that of extreme* sensationalism**.

In short, do you think our government should act on data found in tabloids?

*Extreme (in context of sesationalism) In a spectrum of journalism, with unbiased, accurate reporting with the strict intent to report facts, and the other being extreme sensationalism in which information is presented in an exaggerated, dramatic or even misleading way to get reactions from people; emotional manipulation. Within the extreme all of these traits are consistently used and is further identified by prioritizing shock value - often using bold, hyperbolic headlines, and will often tend to distort or oversimplify facts to maximize appeal.

**Sensationalism in this context is the inclusive criteria of traits described as the following: a focus on celebrity gossip, scandal, and crime stories, the use of compact, easy-to-read format typical of tabloid journalism. Its style emphasizes attention-grabbing content over in-depth analysis, which is characteristic of traditional tabloids.

Extreme sensationalism sacrifices accuracy and nuance, with a heavy focus instead on entertainment, scandal, or fear-mongering to attract attention.

Did I leave anything out?
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
It's a question not an answer he's just diverting it away from him since he was wrong.

Also the answer to his question well if it s misinformation it's misinformation, the people have a right to true and factual information
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
I get wary when I ask people questions and they immediately deflect away from the answer. Those sorts of people give me red flags.
0 ups, 3w
Yeah, if you prove any of the people wrong at one turn they dig deeper into there bucket of nonsense and conspiracy theories
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 1
  • IMG_3022.jpeg
  • The Count
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    If you really need help, please contact a support group but…. You have lost; 0; ZERO rights since Tuesday