My belief is that we should be allowed to say whatever depraved fantasies we have out loud with no consequence. Only when we attempt to commit the crime, are we to be held to answer for it.
In our case, saying "i like bad thing" cannot be treated the same way as "*posts bad thing*."
I just can’t sit comfortably while he is still allowed to do his thing here. It really doesn’t seem right that someone can go “I like animated children” and not face repercussions for that
You're sensitive for freaking out over someone demonstrating that cartoon character ages are meaningless. That's not defending loli. That's pointing out that made up numbers aren't real.
I’m not projecting shit. I think if anyone jorks it to that shit, they should be behind bars. Period. It genuinely is disgusting and should be fully illegal
Then why do you defend this shit, hm? You are defending the attraction to a character that looks 10 years old, that is what you are doing. If you didn’t take this genuinely deplorable stance, I wouldn’t be f**king talking about this
Attraction to children is appalling. That's my stance. Child beauty pageants make me sick. Child marriage infuriates me. Funny how I'm the only one who has mentioned those here. All everyone seems to concern themselves with is make-believe characters cut from whole cloth straight from imagination. Excuse me if I reserve my crocodile tears for actual real living human beings and not works of f**king fiction.
Sexualizing children is disgusting in any case, regardless of the intent behind it. I own that it was shitty of me to perpetuate that garbage, even as a joke or to prove a point. I won't do it anymore. It's not worth the harm it causes. Just wish I'd realized that sooner.
Still puzzled why everyone seems to default to taking it at face value. I always thought the idea of being sexually attracted to children was so absurd that it couldn't help but be taken as a dark joke. Evidently most people find it more plausible than I do, which raises all kinds of questions about them I hadn't even considered until now. Were they abused? Do they find pedophilic urged in themselves? Or are they just so clueless they see an obvious joke as public confession of depraved sexual deviance? None of those explanations make sense on the scale I'm being hit with accusations. Must be a combination. Oof.
The first character is 42 years old. That's legal, unless you're willing to concede that the made up age of made up cartoon characters is meaningless. That's my point that went over your head.
The characters looks f**king 10 years old. I don’t give a damn if it is technically legal, it is wrong to jerk it to something that looks and is designed to look underage, there shouldn’t be a “Yeah, but”, it is bad
You are bringing defenses to it by saying it is legal. Your skirting around the fact that by saying that because the age isn’t real and don’t matter, you are thereby implying that loli isn’t bad. Your moving the goalpost.
I never said loli was legal. I said the images I post follow TOS. You're incorrectly accusing me of moving the goalpost and making a strawman argument. Maybe learn how logical fallacies work before attempting to invoke them in an argument.