Tds

You're literally trying to prosecute your opponents lol

I said kill not prosecute.
Second trump was a criminal before in and after office.

He was not prosecuted because he was President he was prosecuted in spite of it.

He absolutely innocent, scotus said so.

Not in the hush money trial as paying off a pornstar isn’t a presidential duty.

And the criminal act itself occurred before he was in office.

Even scotus can’t save him from that one with their ruling.

Bro, nothing is going to happen. These trials were delay tactics. They failed

I don’t think you know what a delay tactic is…
Because that’s been the entire legal defense for Trump in every trial was either he had a right to do it or filing every motion to delay in the book.

Never should of been a trial in the first place. The didn't even decide on charges until the of the trial. Its s farce. It's wasn't a unanimous decision lol. Completely unconstitutional. It will be dropped

That is factually false as you can’t even begin a trail without the charges being read to defendants/accused.

Like I know Americans don’t know anything about our legal system but come on you had to have watched an episode of law and order at one point.

No, it's not. And it still wasn't a unanimous decision. Constitutional law supercedes NY law.

Yes it is.

“ in the United States, charges are usually read to the accused during an arraignment, which is the first court appearance in a criminal trial. The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 10, requires that the indictment or information be read to the defendant during an arraignment. The defendant can also waive the formal reading.”

You have no idea what you are talking about.

And yes it was unanimous as you need ALL jurors to convict on felony charges as it was not a civil trial.

All 12 jurors found him guilty on all 34 counts.

The convictions do not even attempt to supersede federal law both before and after the ruling.

They decided on charges before he was arrested. The couldn't proceed with that without charging him.

And if it wasn't unanimous, it would have been a hung jury and he would not have been found guilty.

No, the reverse. They were fake. Supposed to give the illusion that some action was being taken against his criminality, yet all the important cases for some strange reason have been sitting on the shelf, despite being ready for years. THAT'S the delay tactic. Having them on hold for one reason or another.

No they did not say that. Ever.

No, the jury was instructed that if they thought he was guilty of any charges to find him guilty, but they were not unanimous on the charges. That's not how it works. It's not going to stand. So even if they were split 4/4/4 on different charges, they still found him guilty lol. He's walking . You don't actually think they're going to lock him up

“Rule 48. Number of Jurors; Verdict; Polling
Primary tabs
(a) Number of Jurors. A jury must begin with at least 6 and no more than 12 members, and each juror must participate in the verdict unless excused under Rule 47(c).

(b) Verdict. Unless the parties stipulate otherwise, the verdict must be unanimous and must be returned by a jury of at least 6 members.”
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_48#:~:text=Unless%20the%20parties%20stipulate%20otherwise,of%20at%20least%206%20members.

Again fake news and lies from you. For felony charges all jurors MUST find him guilty to convict. The idea you only need 4 jurors for a total conviction all charges is just lies.

I don’t think he’ll go to prison for them unless he REALLY pissed off the judge (threatening their family tends to do that.) but he absolutely cannot walk on these charges unless there is direct intervention from the Supreme Court ruling that paying off a pornstar is a presidential duty which it’s not.

No.

Yes.
That’s how the law works.

Bullshit

He literally said “ we are in the midst of the 2nd American Revolution, and it shall remain bloodless if the left allows it.”

That is literally an endorsement of political violence against political opposition.

No. Read it again.
He specifically stated it will be bloodless, IF people like YOU don’t riot and destroy everything in your path like you did when St George the Floyd committed suicide.

No he said “if the left allows it.” Meaning if we try to stop them they are okay with killing us.

He at no point. Never. Not at all in that first statement. “Don’t riot and destroy everything in their path.”

Said that the left could or would riot over 2025 and THAT would be the bloodshed.

Conservatives are lying through their teeth about 2025 just like the don’t say gay laws.

No

Yes

The left is bound to fade away, by nature they don't breed. Surprised they lasted this long

Lmfao.
If you seriously think the left is only gay or have never have kids you have no clue what you’re talking about.

Also IVF is a thing.

Wow
smh

Wait wtf no child left behind was a bush admin policy wtf are you talking about?

Are you saying George w bush was apart of the woke agenda?

He'll yea gb was apart of the woke agenda. You don't really buy into the rep vs dem bs do ya

As technically an independent no I don’t but I’m also not so unhinged as to believe something as nonsensical as George w bush known conservative war criminal who eliminated several rights to privacy and added power to the executive branch was on the go***amn left.