Found it.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/28/us/politics/supreme-court-homelessness.html
" In her dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, wrote that the decision would leave society’s most vulnerable with fewer protections.
“Sleep is a biological necessity, not a crime,” Justice Sotomayor wrote. “For some people, sleeping outside is their only option.”
That the local laws impose fines and potential jail time for people “sleeping anywhere in public at any time, including in their cars, if they use as little as a blanket to keep warm or a rolled-up shirt as a pillow” effectively punishes people for being homeless, she wrote.
“That is unconscionable and unconstitutional,” Justice Sotomayor said in reading her dissent from the bench, a rare move that signals profound disagreement. "
That is a truly disappointing ruling... And it certainly shows the rather heartless nature of the 6 who made the majority. Rather than force Governments and predatory capital to find humane solutions, consistent with Constitution - they just threw the unhoused to the wolves, at the demands of high finance and commercial interests.
Gorsuch's opinion sounds like something from the dark days before the French Revolution. Essentially saying that the law in question was fair - because it criminalizes sleeping outside - for rich and poor alike. In the lead up to the French Revolution, captured in Les Miserables - it was illegal for both rich and poor, to steal bread to eat.