But but but no new wars....except this one of courae....

Then maybe the Left's corrupt political leadership should not be practicing political lawfare to disgrace the Constitution and the INTENT of the Rule of Law. Maybe it's a case of leftists FAAFO.

It's almost comical how you remain unaware of how unhinged you've all become.

"political lawfare" is the biggest steaming dump Felon One has come up with yet, and you guys are eating it up without a care in the world that YOU are the ones destroying our country.

Well said! Thank you.

F**k around...yeah do it. Find out.

Sooo, CH... care to walk everyone through the logic chain starting with debunked claims of massive voter fraud, passes through a multi-state effort to violate the Constitution, ends with domestic extremist groups only one step removed from being domestic terrorists assaulting the Capitol in an attempt to overthrow the U.S. government after being whipped up by a lying con-man for the sole purpose of installing said lying con-man illegally in the Oval Office which somehow justifies it all?

You mean as state after state has been admitting in retrospect that, yes, leftist voting 'irregularities' -- from the dead voting -- to actual records having gone missing; did indeed happen. But then again since leftist media outlets don't consider that newsworthy, leftists know nothing about it . . . and are definitely not interested in performing independent research that would refute their official party-sanctioned political narrative.

The willfully blind cannot see. It's all there and you do not need ME to do your research for you. All you need is an honesty and the will to discover the actual truth.

Just throwing out empty claims with no source and saying the blind cant see...is weak and lazy....you can try harder..right?

By all means, cite your source. And exactly how many dead people did your source say voted, CH? My sources say it was less than 10 total per locales in question. What was the reason, overall impact of said "voting irregularities" on the outcome of 2020's presidential election? And, even though you've proven such is difficult for you, think for a moment, CH -if a record is missing, what proof is there, how could your source know it actually existed in the first place? By claim issuing from someone with a partisan interest in supporting the "stolen election" narrative, perhaps?

See? You have made up your mind and no source I could present will change your perspective. Sources swapping games are just that . . . games.

The election was stolen and the Left is brazenly conducting Soviet Union style political show trials against Trump while the fanatically leftist loyal mainstream media outlets openly block, spin, and cover for them.

The proof will be in Trump re-rewinning the presidential election with the help of Dem Party voters disgusted with these unconstitutional practices of their leadership . . . assuming that the Dem Party simply does not have him assassinated when everything else fails.

It's odd... it was requested you walk everyone through the logic chain justifying Trump's claims of stolen election, the fake elector plot orchestrated by the Trump campaign, the 1/6 insurrection, attack on Congress and yet you seem to be doing everything you can to avoid the topic. Whatever... I'll play your game.

"See? You have made up your mind and no source I could present will change your perspective."

Why would I bother asking for your source, to see the information you're relying on if my mind was made up on the issue? You're not just looking for a way to shut down the conversation, are you, CH? I'm trying to dig down to the foundation of your argument and get a sense of your reasoning, maybe get hold of solid evidence to back your claims -meanwhile, you're making assumptive pronouncements.

"The election was stolen and the Left is brazenly conducting Soviet Union style political show trials against Trump while the fanatically leftist loyal mainstream media outlets openly block, spin, and cover for them."

So you're saying that Trump's inner circle -the lawyers, staffers, all the people who were there, witnessed what you didn't, know what you don't- are all lying? As far as "Soviet style show trials" go -where's the video coverage? Where are all the demonstrable government plants posing as witnesses? Have you bothered to read the charging instrument in Trump's NY criminal indictment? Have you asked yourself why Trump's own current, long-time employees in good standing with both Trump Corp. and the law effectively testified again him? Have you read the trial transcripts, reviewed the witnesses' testimony on the stand? Have you considered the fact Michael Cohen confessed to $30k of previously unknown, as-yet-unprosecuted grand larceny under oath? If not, well... that pretty much defaults one into the "talking out yer ass" bin, doesn't it?

In other words, it wouldn't be anything at all for the alleged great and powerful, operatives everywhere, fingers in all the pies "deep state" and/or the allegedly do anything to be shut of him "Dem Party" to have taken him out any time over the last few years. And really, considering the lure of a sitting POTUS' temporary immunity to prosecution, Trump's former status as unindicted co-conspirator (now indicted, tried, convicted) in a string of state felonies and his federal indictments for crimes which could and likely will land him in prison/under house-arrest for whatever time he has left to live, it's not like his getting into the 2024 race was some unexpected, unforseeable event.

I mean... if he's such a monumental problem, why haven't "they" made your assassination fantasy a reality already? To put it more succinctly, Occam's razor would tend to indicate it's because there's no "they" there; it's just an aging, crooked, inveterate, orange-painted liar demonstratedly too much of a dope to know not to put himself under the world's biggest investigative microscope trying to capitalize on an ever-dwindling flock of weak minded suckers' vulnerability to conspiracy mindset in a desperate bid to escape accountability.

"The proof will be in Trump re-rewinning the presidential election..."

If the proof of your claims lays in Trump winning the '24 election, what if he loses? Then what? He's been making a whiny ass of himself on camera multiple times daily for the last 6 weeks, losing track of his lies, tripping himself up, making contradictory campaign platform statements from one venue to the next. In short, he's doing all the same things that made Biden palatable in '20 (with the added detraction of exhibiting glaring symptoms of progressing dementia) only worse and which, ultimately, cost him voters, the election. Will you make a circular fall back to cries of "election fraud" & "stolen election," take the implied position that an election is only legitimate if your candidate wins? I mean... you're the one trying to paint things in terms of "Soviet S.O.P." -just sayin'.

"...with the help of Dem Party voters disgusted with these unconstitutional practices of their leadership..."

What unconstititional practices? Elaborate, CH; do you mean the "unconstitutional" gag order talking point or some other of the multitudinous canards squeezed out by the rightwing propaganda machine over the last few years?

Honestly, doesn't really matter which -although I do hope that's exactly what you're talking about; I'm itching for an opportunity to burn that idiotic MAGA talking point to the ground with a straight-forward lesson in constitutional dynamics.

". . . assuming that the Dem Party simply does not have him assassinated when everything else fails.

Let's see... he routinely plays golf out in the open where any good sniper could pick him off, his plane could have had mechanical trouble and fallen out of the sky, his medications could have been compounded with a hot round and, on top of that, he's an old geezer who eats from the Mar-a-Lago (repeatedly popped for the type of kitchen health code violation that would easily foster C. botulinum) feed troughs on a regular basis so a fatal round of botulism likely wouldn't even raise any eyebrows.