▶️ "CraigThompson 4h
Cohen was the only witness in determining "intent." "Intent" was how mislabeling an expense on a balance sheet was elevated to a felony. How does a private balance sheet influence an election? That makes no sense. Also labeling an expense is an accounting decision. Why would Trump even know about it?"
⚫ Why did you ask me a question whose answer was not only already explained to you 11 hours prior, but from which you literally derived your question from, retrofitting its language to reply to me to a comment that was to somebody else? Obviously it's not like you somehow missed that reply or had forgotten it when it in fact it had framed your later reply to me:
▶️ "CtrlFreq 15h, 1 reply
NY 17-152 means Trump was convicted of 34 counts of election interference -by- committing accounting violations.
Intent was determined by testimony from David Pecker, who Trump personally called initially in an attempt to bury Stormy's story, employees in the Trump Organization and Trump White House who help facilitated the payments and fraud, and even a recorded call of Trump himself discussing the conspiracy.
Cohen was only there to provide an insider's view of the four weeks of evidence and testimony provided, which is why the Trump defense of crying Cohen is a liar wasn't convincing outside the GOP bubble."