When we tried to tell you about this you called it a conspiracy theory. It has now happened.

https://futureearth.org/contacts/amy-luers/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_system_governance

Earth System Governance, ESG
Using the acronym for other things, Eco-Social; etc. to deflect with misinfo and disinfo
until implemented...

Wow How'd that happen to us? I was just walking down the street, when BAM,
a world government consumed the USA and we all became Citizens of a One World Government.
It was like Magic... Ooooh the Global Utopian Dream might come true. Let's throw the USA baby out with the EU and Brexit Bathwater. Yeah !

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Future_Earth

Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence.

Bringing Intelligence, that is Artificial, to You.

Soon a GLOBAL SCALE

https://hai.stanford.edu/people/amy-luers

Yep. That's how change happens. In a similar way, when CA insisted on stricter mpg and fuel efficiency standards in the early 2000s, it ended up changing the industry enough to mean lower gas bills and cleaner air for other states too.

I grew up in California. I lived there most of my life. I know what those standards were. They were forcing oil companies to put MTBE into gasoline. MTBE is a by product of producing gasoline. Because of this MTBE was getting into the California water supply. It was linked to an increase in the number of miscarriages. It was showing up in Lake Tahoe. So California took decisive action and instead of telling the oil companies to stop putting MTBE in gasoline they banned gasoline powered boats. Because CA is screwed up like that.

Oh and by the way. MTBE did absolutely nothing to clean the air. The oil companies were happy about it because now they didn't have to find a way to disposed of it. Nor did it lower gas bills, it raised them.

ESG is not change for the better. It is all promoted as Environmental and saving us from whatever bad is supposed to happen if the climate changes. That is only the E in ESG. Social and Governance have to do with controlling people. Social is controlling people through societal pressure and Governance is through legislation and public/private partnerships (aka fascism).

The World Economic Forum (the ones who came up with the idea of ESG) are saying they are looking on imposing these standards on people as well.

If you or any business does not comply then their social credit score will suffer and they will be penalized.

If you think this is a good thing then immigrate to China where life will be wonderful for you. They're already doing a social credit score. Or, if you have Netflix, what Season 3, episode 1 of Black Mirror. The episode called Nosedive.

While ya'll looking at ESG as Environmental Social Governance .... which is understandable, yet doing the design and bidding of others, as like you observed, the WEF... that is to lead your efforts and focus, and many a company on a wild goose chase.

Meanwhile, using this slight of hand to the full extent,
the actual meaning of the same acronym, ESG is the 2012 United Nation Creation of the
Earth System Governance Program with yes, get this, A "SECRETARIAT OF FUTURE EARTH"

As wild as this sounds, do your own research... this program and these deceptive elitists (in the tens of thousands) are going to implement something so fast, and so complete, that there will be no room for the general populace to dissent, as they will have created an environment and Political Climate so undesirable, that their offering will seem much desired and a wickedly sensible alternative to adopt with full support of the sheeple.

As such, both parties are funneling into this same outcome. It doesn't matter whom you vote for in all 80 democracies internationally that are holding elections this year, as both parties will highly likely lead to this same outcome.

https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/people/amyluers/

And, yes, change can be bad as well as good. And what does this law do?

"The European Parliament voted on Wednesday for a new law that will require larger companies operating in the bloc to check if their supply chains use forced labour or cause environmental damage and act to take action if they do." -- https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/eu-imposes-esg-compliance-requirements-6073539/

So, they've found a way to use their economic influence to pressure (but not force) businesses to rely less on forced labor and climate-degradation. I'm not a fan of slavery, or environmental catastrophe, so I'll say, "Yay!" And if you would rather have your company keep its forced labor or reckless pollution, you can still do that -- but you'll have to sell your products in your own backyard.

How Constitutional Republic of the Marxists.

...the Marxist "Stakeholders", that is.