Dear Harrison Butker, you're a hypocritical anti-freedom douchebag

?

So stop insulting

So your main point is that he said they were "lied to" that careers in the secular workplace world are the ONLY path to fulfillment.

You have offered little in support that this career path "truth" is "The Only Path to Fulfillment" for all College Graduate Women regardless of religion or marital status? If it is not the only path, and there exists other paths, then to the kicker, this may be "The Lie" that has been told by USA society to college graduate catholic women and the men in their lives that support them on their life journey.

He offered that becoming a nurturing, loving, responsible mother and faithful wife
is another optional path to fulfillment. Can you offer anything to the contrary, that disproves this claim of his? That one can attain fulfillment in more than one narrow vocational path,
by becoming a nun, or through their career, or nurturing, loving, responsible motherhood, or other paths if one is physically incapable of having their own children (adopt, or volunteer)

He advocated for mainly one path, yet that does not make that path the only path possible, nor does it nullify his claim, because that is your least desirable path for you.

This apparently upset people ( me ! me ! me ! ) whom internalized this comment as not inclusive of them,
...as they've NOT chosen this optional alternative to seek fulfillment. The comment is also excluding men whom may not become a loving, nurturing, responsible mother nor faithful wife for biology already chose that option for them at birth.
(At ease, "transphobe" vocabulary holders, this topic isn't about you, until you make it about you.)
If you don't want to be included, you don't have to be DEI inclusive... and any church of any denomination ought not be compelled to change their teachings, just so that they fit you rather than you fit in with their teachings. Feel free to live and let live, if you choose not to join his church.

Some nuns feel left out of this option as well, for they chose another path to fulfillment than motherhood.

We're all human. Why be envious of paths we have not chosen for ourselves to seek our own fulfillment? Our uniqueness on these many varied paths are okay. Our differences can be strengths.

You are being dishonest again and you are now making the most absurd strawman argument against me. First of all, he didn't say that the notion that careers "are the only path to fulfillment" is being pushed. He is suggesting that the notion that women can have any career they want at all is a "lie" he literally said he thinks women shouldn't have the option for a career. I also never said that a woman should ONLY have college and a career and not the option of motherhood, nobody thinks women should only have a career and not motherhood as an option. You are making like I have a problem with women choosing motherhood but I never had such a stance so stop strawmanning me. You are accusing me of "not being inclusive to tradwives" you couldn't be any more absurd as I never had a problem with women choosing marriage instead of careers. You are twisting it around and accusing me of the very thing Harrison Butker is guilty of, women choosing options instead of just one thing. You went on a long rant to accuse me of excluding women from choosing motherhood and marriage when I never did such a thing so you are being completely braindead. People are not mad at Harrison Buttpipe for saying it's ok for women to choose motherhood, he didn't even say that, he basically said that women choosing careers instead of motherhood is a bad thing and ONLY motherhood should be an option for women.

My comments are not about you.

Your comments are still strawman arguments about the people you are actually talking about, nobody pushes the notion that women should ONLY have careers instead of marriage and motherhood.

& yet we go on as if it his speech in context, was meant for your ears or mine.
One can aspire, I guess. Eavesdropping leads to gossip.

What?
Your perceptions are telling. Who is really being honest here?

His speech was not INCLUSIVE of you, nor me.
& yet you go on as if it his speech in context, was meant for your ears. One can aspire, I guess.

It is your "honest" meme title calling this individual man
hypocritical and a feminine hygiene product, is it not?

& I am the one that is "being very dishonest" when someone here in this dialogue avoids answering direct questions. Interesting.

Regarding your comment in the last sentence, "persecuted religious group"... one only has to
read of the history of the United Kingdom since 1534... to discover continuously revisited
Government sponsored laws and actions up to the present day that persecute or specifically exclude them, ...ever hear of Henry VIII's Dissolution of the Monastaries... Cromwell beheading Charles I?
...and especially property ownership banned within the Catholic Republic of Ireland... yet also for the 160 years leading up to the Declaration of Independance especially in the historical colony of Maryland which was set up for Catholics to leave England. What is the origin story of the Candy Cane or the pretzel?
The KKK really love Catholics as an optional target of their vitriolic desires. so yes, "as if" the Catholics ought to ignore history

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Catholicism_in_the_United_Kingdom