Imgflip Logo Icon

Facts to a Feels Fight

Facts to a Feels Fight | ARGUING WITH LIBERALS? PREPARE TO BRING FACTS TO A FEELS FIGHT! | image tagged in kirk lazarus,facts,feelings | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
181 views 14 upvotes Made by Magnuson 1 month ago in politics
Kirk Lazarus memeCaption this Meme
58 Comments
2 ups, 1mo,
2 replies
When yall plan on brining some facts?
2 ups, 1mo,
2 replies
Facts....they mean a Twitter post! You know what im talking about!!
2 ups, 1mo
Bruh check out this unhinged meltdown…
2 ups, 1mo
YouTube
2 ups, 1mo,
2 replies
Usually us conservatives bring a fact and your side use lies to try to tear it down. I'll give you an example: boys are boys and girls are girls. That will really flip your wigs!
2 ups, 1mo
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
2 ups, 1mo,
3 replies
Now who’s lying…first not what you say you say there are only boys and girls. (“OnLy TwO gEnDeRs!”) a man opinion easily disproven by the existence of hemaphrodites which are both, if one can be both why can they be in between, neither, or not be the one that was put on a piece of paper.

Especially since it occurs in nature regularly. And even ignoring the naturalism fallacies.

We’re humanity. Our whole schtick is giving the finger to the natural order for our benefit.
[deleted]
0 ups, 1mo,
2 replies
2 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
1 up, 1mo,
2 replies
Humans are not moles nor are they hyenas. Checkmate. Kippers for breakfast.
2 ups, 1mo
"Magnuson

Hermaphordites do not occur in nature regularly"
2 ups, 1mo,
2 replies
Correct thanks to our knowledge and bending of the rules of nature we are able to both on the top of the food chain and apex animal on this planet.

So if they can do it naturally. why can’t we? Through hormones and surgery. Or are you this adamant against boob jobs too?
2 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Or even haircuts, for that matter. Oh, and clothing too, which, according to Christianity, is basically Original Sin, or at least an indicator or symptom of...

If the GodS wanted people to wear clothes, they would have created them with clothes, or, as otherwise known with other mammals, fur, naked skin covering fur.
2 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Wait so does that technically make a furry more or less sinful than Adam and Eve?
2 ups, 1mo
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
I'm not a big fan of women making themselves look unnatural either. There's a lot of stuff here you sound like you're for, Dr. Moreau.
0 ups, 1mo,
3 replies
So you hate make up then? You hate your plastic surgery to have un realistic body proportions?
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
Oh god, you were BORN in '66?? So your days ended long ago. You're at the end of that rung. I'll answer. No. I rather don't prefer that either. How about some earnestness?

The real lesson to learn in college was to reject college.
0 ups, 1mo
Lmao no 66 is just my lucky number.

How is telling me to reject the college education that I’ve use to saved lives earnestness?

Like do you all just think it’s all basket weaving and gender studies. Because mine centered on learning the importance’s of maintaining a high vac for sputtering titanium and gold
1 up, 1mo
Frankly I don't like make up nor plastic surgery. "Hate" is a strong word.
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
I think you're being disingenuous with this line of questioning and therefore will entertain it no longer. What are you, a college student?
0 ups, 1mo
I am not being disingenuous I’m dead serious.

Those are all procedures done to make hetero people feel better or “normal.” And are widely accepted or in some cases like celebrities expected.

If they can do that to feel more themselves and they are adults then why not trans adults.
Also my college days were done a long time ago.
2 ups, 1mo
What happened to facts over feelings? Your just devolving into religious rhetoric because I pointed out a hole in your logic.
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSjPAwsEXMU

Dedicating this which is "Terrible Lie" by Nine Inch Nails to you. When did you decide lies were better than truth?
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
Lmfao yeah okay buddy.
1 up, 1mo
I'm right and you're wrong. The sooner you accept it the better. Trust me. Reality is going to knock you on your @$$ very soon.
[deleted]
0 ups, 1mo,
2 replies
2 ups, 1mo,
2 replies
Playing along with your logic fallacy based off sexes and not gender and pointing out an obvious error in the fallacy’s own logic is not me admitting the binary.

It’s me playing along to point out that even under your own arguments standards…it’s wrong.
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
You rub off on me as someone who has never been challenged in his views in his entire life. Is this true? I thought you'd be better prepared here. I always think people will be well-prepared because I want to think the best of people.
2 ups, 1mo
I’m progressive on a right wing dominated stream my views get challenged every day not my fault these “challenges” to my views and policies are about as easy as a Sesame Street pc game.

Unlike you having a nuclear meltdown because a challenged you on one belief that you disingenuously presented to begin with as “boys are boys and girls are girls.” For “the only two genders.” Belief.
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
"Based off sexes and not gender." LOL. They're the same thing.

But let me smash the walnut here. We know there are species that reproduce sexually and species that reproduce asexually. How do human beings reproduce?
2 ups, 1mo,
2 replies
Sigh… as I’ve already stated…

“Especially since it occurs in nature regularly. And even ignoring the naturalism fallacies.

We’re humanity. Our whole schtick is giving the finger to the natural order for our benefit.”
[deleted]
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
2 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Oh no another insult instead of an argument.

“Also In vitro fertilization exists. It no longer takes two to tango. And given we grew a lamb in a bag wouldn’t put it past science to find a way to make it possible for humans.”

Implies that we reproduce sexually but now can do so asexually through artificial means. In fact if cloning wasn’t banned it would be easier. And given we could grow a lamb in a bag humans wouldn’t be a far fetched possibility.
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
In vitro is a form of sexual reproduction. Why are you talking about things you know nothing about anyway?
1 up, 1mo
Sperm banks.
And if you remove the ban on cloning it would only make it easier using host cell dna.
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
Let's not put humanity on a pedestal and let's not change the subject.

You apparently misunderstand the question. There are only two possible answers to the question I have posed: Either humans reproduce sexually or they don't, in which case they presumably reproduce asexually. As I have stated earlier, there are species that reproduce asexually. When's the last time you reproduced? Was it asexually? I'd love to hear about it if it was. Did you use mitosis?
2 ups, 1mo,
8 replies
Why because it points out dumb the nature argument is especially since it doesn’t even work in the nature fallacy.
Or because humanity rocks and you want to hold it back because of feelings?

Also In vitro fertilization exists. It no longer takes two to tango. And given we grew a lamb in a bag wouldn’t put it past science to find a way to make it possible for humans.
2 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
I had seen something from a few years ago, 2016? Like, a few that were born premature that were then incubated for 4 weeks?
2 ups, 1mo
I was mistaken it was in 2017 not 7 months ago.
2 ups, 1mo
Ah, ok.
2 ups, 1mo,
2 replies
I had not previously heard about the lambs grown in a bags. Interesting.
2 ups, 1mo
Yep successfully managed to incubate a lamb fetus. I think it was about 7 months ago?
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
Now you're lying about answering my question.
2 ups, 1mo
“Also In vitro fertilization exists. It no longer takes two to tango. And given we grew a lamb in a bag wouldn’t put it past science to find a way to make it possible for humans.”

No im not.
[deleted]
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
2 ups, 1mo
Eh another insult….
I know about the Icarus myth I ignored your “warning” because many medical advancements occurred despite “they’re playing god.” Or flying to close to the son.
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
You're just diverting to putting humanity on a pedestal because you want to change the subject. I asked you a question. The proper form is to answer it. You're not answering my question because of fear. You realize it will put you in a position of inferiority to me to answer the question. Maybe now's the time to admit it and just back out of the argument. You're starting to make a fool out of yourself.
2 ups, 1mo
Already answered it last comment.

Also I’m not the unhinged person making a fool of myself by giving into pure emotion and throwing whatever at the wall until something sticks ranging from fallacy, religion, ad hominem, and refusal to accept the capabilities from advancement of science AFTER posting a meme about …

*checks notes*

Ah yes how liberals are the only ones who are emotional and only conservatives use facts.
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
And if you want me to answer your science: Careful, Icarus.
2 ups, 1mo
Answer my science what are…do you mean respond to the fact science has made major medical advances?

Also replacing one myth for another from outside your religion still isn’t a fact.
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
No, you purposefully dodged the thrust of my warning to avoid accountability and I called you out on it. god, you are super dishonest here. You know that? And you're disingenuous.
2 ups, 1mo
Says the person throwing insults the covered his tracks by trying portray Down syndrome as a compliment.
2 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Also really devolving into insults by saying I have downs.

Most shameful display of feelings over facts.
1 up, 1mo
Insults= arguing with feeelings! Rotflmao!!!!
Show More Comments
Kirk Lazarus memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
ARGUING WITH LIBERALS? PREPARE TO BRING FACTS TO A FEELS FIGHT!