Epic Handshake

More than 2 seems more like philosophy

shut the f**k up

you just proved his point, you have zero arguments and only simple insults. also if you don't like Christian beliefs, get out of the Christian stream

I do have arguments

there is homosexual behavior in animals just look it up

tbh i'm done arguing. also those animals are a special case, deer cannot and will not ever be homosexual

This isn't Christian beliefs it's political beliefs backed by personal religious beliefs. Jesus was Jewish meaning that he would be prochoice if having a baby would cause the mother undue stress. Jewish people also have believed in more than two genders and have words for them in Hebrew. That's the way it is under Jewish law. That's what Jesus would've believed, because that was still Christianity for the time being.

first off, jesus would NEVER promote killing anyone, even if it causes someone undue stress. and that's a generalization, you can't tell what someone believes based off their race. second off, not everything the jewish did were right. the jewish shunned gentiles for simply not being jewish, would that be something christianity should follow? and since not everything the jewish did or said was right, then having more than 2 genders would fall in line of them doing something wrong. not to mention, in all my years of reading the bible, i've never once seen mention of more than 2 genders. what's your source and your proof that there's more genders, and if there are more, what are their names?

also, where are the scriptures that clearly outline these genders?

Enuch. That's what the Romans called it when they translated the bible. If you're interested in Jewish religion, you can Google what they called it. And you can say Jewish ppl were "wrong" but at that time they were right. Jesus followed their laws, he just didn't respect certain clergy, because they were hypocrites.

Jesus followed their laws because the laws were issued by God. and even if they were right at the time, should we follow that now? if they were right AT THE TIME then that implies they're wrong now. and there's no rebuttal to the abortion argument or mention of scripture in your argument. not to mention, eunuch isn't a gender. eunuch is loss of your crotch organ and has nothing to do with gender identity. your entire response is a nothing burger

*eunuch is any male that is castrated (loss of use of crotch organ)

Enuch would still count as another gender by modern definitions of gender. I'm just saying if Jesus followed those rules, it has to be good enough for me.

it seems that you're grasping at straws. modern definitions of gender are not to be followed, since the same group that made those definitions also tried to normalize pedophilia and hates Christianity. please repent and reflect on everything we said today

Says who? The bible or fox news? Cuz I know real trans ppl and they are good ppl. My trans friend is a priest and he's come over to cast out demons in my home before.

the people are good, or at least most, but many of their actions reflect a hatred for God. just talk to anyone about God and chances are, they don't want to hear it

No. Most of them are really good people who do godly things. You're probably just talking to transmed trans people. They tend be a bit angrier than most.

Except eunuchs were male and identified as male. They did not consider themselves anything other than male. They just didn't have those organs. Men have surgeries today to get those removed. Does that mean they aren't men anymore?

And furthermore, does having those organs mean they are male?

That's how we assign sex at birth. And eunuchs didn't identify as anything. That wasn't a thing back then. Enuch was just a separate social class from men and women. That's what a gender is.

Also, you say Jesus followed those rules. Could you clarify which ones?

Jewish law.