When You Pay More To Live Worse We Call That Bidenomics

I can tell that you didn't listen to a single word of his state of the union address

I did.

And as I did, there was this eerie feeling of IQs dropping all throughout the audience.

Not for Congress though. Their IQ's can't get much lower.

Oh! You meant the parts where Demented Joe lied about how good the economy is? Yeah, I sort of dozed off whenever he was lying. Don't worry though, his unhinged yelling would always wake me back up.

Can't you see that politics are tearing our country apart? Yeah, he's doing a damn good job, all things considered. Your president would rather let Europe get steamrolled by Russia, instead of hhelp.our allies. That's unamerican, and that's cruel

Anyways, I don't feel like arguing with you, why is there a politics stream to begin with

But you'll all listen to a criminal who says exactly what you want to hear instead of facts

That is why we -didn't- listen to the state of the Union, we didn't want to listen to a criminal.

You are missing my point

Please arrive at your point. Thanks.

My point is that Biden isn't the criminal here. Your president wasn't in any public office, and he ran for president because he knew he'd win off of the support of people like you. That's my point.

"Your president wasn't in any public office, and he ran for president because he knew he'd win off of the support of people like you."

That's your point? What the hell kind of a point is that?

Let's break it down a bit. So *my* president wasn't in any public office? What does that have to do with anything? You say that like it's a bad thing. Given how those in public office have pretty much derailed the country, I'd say it's a good thing.

Besides, are you saying that a person shouldn't run for a public office unless they are or have been in a public office? You have got to realize that makes no sense. It's a logical fallacy.

In fact, it's contrary to what the Founders wanted for those serving in govt. They wanted citizens to govern, not career losers like Pelosi, Schumer, McConnell and of course, Demented Joe.

Next, you contend that he ran for POTUS "because he knew he'd win off of the support of people like you." I suppose in your world, you'd have him run when he thinks he'll lose. There's liberal logic for you.

Or, you could define what you mean by "people like you". It's always hilarious when people pre-judge me, because they are usually dead wrong.

Hey, Biden is not technically a criminal, yet. (he would be, if he had been charged for mishandling all the top-secret documents that he was *never* supposed to have in his personal possession)

Watch what you say about the POTUS!!! 🤣🤣🤣

So your president also had documents. He also has been convicted of fraud, and he's almost been impeached twice. He's only telling you what you wanna hear.

Yes, my POTUS had documents, which as POTUS he was allowed to have. (don't go ballistic and please note the use of the past tense) Unlike when Biden stole his documents, Trump had the power to classify and de-classify, whether you like that or not. So the question related to Trump is, did he take whatever steps are necessary to declassify the documents before he took them? That will be adjudicated.

Regardless, I don't know how anyone can compare Trump and Biden, since Biden had documents that under absolutely no circumstance whatsoever was he allowed to have. NONE.

And time for a civics lesson... good grief, why do I always have to do this with liberals? Trump WAS impeached twice. He was never convicted. Please learn how impeachment works, because it looks like that info will be of interest to you pretty soon, since there appears to be waaaaay more evidence of Biden's wrong-doing than the made up crap the libtards used when they impeached Trump.

Regarding the "conviction", you better enjoy that while you can. Once it goes to appeal it will likely be overturned because the judge in the case has worse TDS than you do. While having TDS is perfectly legal, issuing summary judgments and denying a defendant due process, then hitting them with outrageous fines is not. This judge, it seems, is unaware of the 8th Amendment.

Have you heard the comments of Cuban and O'Leary, neither of whom cares for Trump? They both point out some incredibly obvious things. Since you probably are unaware of any pro-Trump news, I will echo those points and say that the idiot AG in NY, James, is pretty much acting out the old saying about cutting off your nose to spite your face. She'll never get the money for the state, and any business person or corporation considering new business or expansion in NY is likely now to consider not doing so. Why? Because the precedent has been set that when no crime was committed, and there is no victim, the state of NY can seize your assets anyway. How do you like living in a fascist country like that?

As O'Leary pointed out, take Trump out of it and it's a fuster cluck. James will be gone (soon, hopefully) but the precedent will still be there. Problem for your side is that their pathetic lawfare tactics can (and likely will) be used against them. The left just isn't sharp enough to pick up on that. Apples. I hope they like 'em.