At some point the drugs they the pump Biden full of are going to kill him.

Modda. Pay attention. We're not talking about Trump here.

I am singular, one person. I'm not "yous". Y'all got that straight now? Bless your heart.

🟧 "AdamSmithsInvisibleHand 3h

I am singular, one person. I'm not "yous". Y'all got that straight now? Bless your heart."

🟧 "AdamSmithsInvisibleHand 7h, 1 reply

Modda. Pay attention. We're not talking about Trump here."

▶️ Modda. Pay attention. ⏭️We're⏮️not talking about Trump here.

⏭️We⏮️'re

"AdamSmithsInvisibleHand 7h, 1 reply

We..."

Awh dude!!!! You didn't catch the joke. Did you not read my full reply? You say "yous" and I told you that I am one person. Then I replied with "y'all". You didn't get it?

Maybe it wasn't the funniest joke ever but come on. Lighten up. You're just too serious all the time.

Yeah, I'm kind of somewhat slightly a bit totally aware of what I said a lot. Something to do with me having had said it?

Reliability would be defined as well-sourced and uninfluenced by money or political agendas. Both which the sources I listed above say is unsatisfactory for The Federalist.

I’m not trying to bruise anyone’s egos nor strike anyone’s opinion down, just making sure we all have our facts in line

I meant who determined that Media Bias Fact Check, Ad Fontes Media, and Source Watch are reliable, well sourced, and uninfluenced by money or political agendas?

That’s why I told you my sources, so that if you knew anything sketchy about them you could point out where I fall short. Again, I’m not trying to discredit anyone, just looking for all the facts

I can understand wanting facts instead of propaganda.

My question remains:

Who determines whether or not your sources are reliable, well sourced, and uninfluenced by money or political agendas?

For the record, it is not my intent to give you a hard time.

I would like to know the answer, if you know.

You raise a good point, and to be completely honest, I do not know. Perhaps looking into them would be a worthy venture for the both of us.

Thank you for your patience

You are probably a better researcher than I.

I will be interested to learn what you discover.

What isn't skewed to the right or left these days? The mainstream media omits the truth and flat out lies about everything. There is nothing reliable in the mainstream. That is CNN, NBC, CBS, ABC, Reuters, AP, New York Times, Los Angeles Times, etc. It goes all the way down to your local news anchors when they report about anything happening in Washington DC or anything else political.

Is the Federalist right wing? Are they unreliable? To the left, yes but the left is on a huge propaganda campaign and they cannot allow even the slightest dissent. So they will label everything on the right unreliable. For the most part, what I have read on the Federalist has been accurate.

This is why I said earlier, when possible always go to the source. When I told you about the World Economic Forums plan to collapse the global economy, I fully expect you to go to their website and do all of your research there. Don't listen to what a journalist might want you to think about what the WEF is saying, find out for yourself.

When the country was burning down because of George Floyd's death, as soon as the transcripts of from the cop's cameras was release I read that. When the audio came out I listened to that. When the autopsy report said Floyd died of a heart attack brought on by a fentanyl overdose that matched exactly what the transcripts showed. Floyd was complaining he couldn't breath long before they got him on the ground. They put him in the police car twice but he kept saying he couldn't breath and got out of the car. It was the second time he got out the brought him to the ground. The knee on his neck didn't do anything to exacerbate his condition. Floyd was in the process of dying just before the cops even talked to him. Had the cops never showed up he still would have died. He OD'd on fentanyl and that is the only cause of his death.

When the media reported on Kyle Rittenhouse going to Kenosha with an AR-15 to shoot down protestors I found video recordings, some with audio from several different angles. I listened to Rittenhouse when he was interviewed. Rittenhouse only used his weapon in self defense and for no other reason.

It is not always possible to get the source. And if it is anything that goes counter to the left's narrative, it is going to be very, very, very hard to find on Google and most all of the other search engines. They are all skewed to the liberal narrative, especially Google.

There is no equilibrium that must be maintained. Biden is not restoring any kind of balance that Trump upset when he cut taxes. The tax cuts that Trump signed into law were minor. Taxation is theft.

If slavery is defined in not being able to keep the products of your own labor then at what percentage is it no longer slavery? Even the periods of human history where slavery was acceptable the slave's labor gave them food, clothing and shelter. Slavery has never confiscated 100% of the products on the slave labor. So with that in mind at what percentage is it no longer slavery? 50%? 40% 20% 1%?

If any part of my labor is taken by force then I become a slave to that person or persons who takes my earnings. It doesn't matter if it is theif or the federal government, neither earned that money.

The left pushes this narrative that when they get in power after a Republicans has given us a tax cut that they have to restore some sort of balance, just because without heavy taxation all of the wasteful spending won't be paid for. It's a political show and both sides are wrong. And both sides fall for it. A tax cut is a step in the right direction but it is not the solution.

The solution is to repeal all taxation and reduce the size of the federal government by 95%. It can't be done overnight, it has to be gradual because if you through that many government employees out of a job all at once it will collapse the economy. Regardless, the government needs to be far less involved in our lives than they currently are.

Democrats have taken to calling their spending "infrastructure" and then they point to the crumbling roads and bridges. It is a lie. City, county and state governments take care of the roads and bridges. The federal government just uses this lie to raise taxes for spending on whatever they want.

The federal income tax was never intended as a means of financing the government. It was created as a means to control the people. That is why on average everyone in the country commits three felonies per day on tax violations. It doesn't matter how honest you are. The laws are written as entrapment that the government can and has used on either parties political enemies.

Our income is taxed. What is left over after being taxes is taxed again, sometimes multiple times, when we use it. Then when we retire, the social security recipients have to pay income taxes on that. We are worse now than when we lived under British rule.

Trump's tax cuts for the rich are part of what added 25% to the Federal debt during his 4 years in office.

25%.

Out of near 250 years of spending.

Eliminating the debt was another promise he didn't keep.

Shocker.

Can you ever think beyond the liberal propaganda talking points? "Tax cuts for the rich". That such a bogus myth.

YOUR Marxist taxation scheme sets it up so that the rich pay more than the poor. It's based on percentage of the income. So if there is a tax cut then the rich get to keep a larger dollar amount than the poor or middle class because it is based on percentages and in addition the percentage is greater for the rich. If there is a tax increase the exact opposite happens. The rich pay a whole lot more than the poor and middle class.

But when you look at things from a different angle you will see that 80% of all money stolen by the government from the people comes from the rich. The poor and middle class make up the remaining 20%, with the middle class paying a larger amount than the poor.

As far as government spending, it has NEVER been related to tax cuts or tax increases. Obama gave us the largest tax increase in human history and just kept spending and spending and spending.

Trump gave is weak tax cut and kept spending and spending and spending.

Biden reversed Trump's tax and kept spending and spending and spending. Biden is the biggest spender of them all.

Why does your graph end with Trump? Is there some reason why you are hiding Biden's spending? And look how insane Obama's spending was before Trump.

BTW Trump's spending is one of the reasons why I don't like Trump. He spends money like Democrats. He's worse than Bush Jr and Bush Jr was bad. However, as bad as Bush Jr was we have never seen the unprecedented spending like we've seen under Obama, Trump and especially Biden.