Imgflip Logo Icon

The one and only time a fraud trial like this has EVER occurred. Tell me again it’s not political.

The one and only time a fraud trial like this has EVER occurred. Tell me again it’s not political. | AFTER THIS TRIAL, NEVER EVER; INVEST IN NEW YORK REAL ESTATE | image tagged in fraud trial,new york,trump,engoron,political | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
666 views 37 upvotes Made by RunawayTrain 9 months ago in politics
20 Comments
4 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
4 ups, 9mo
Godfather | WE ARE BUSINESSMEN NOT OUTRIGHT THIEVES | image tagged in godfather | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
Need a loan? We can give you money. Can’t pay it back? We own your business.
Need security? Look no further.
3 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
General Ripper (Dr. Strangelove) | BETTER YET REFUSE TO BANK WITH A NEW YORK BASED FINANCIAL INSTITUTION, | image tagged in general ripper dr strangelove | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1 up, 9mo
That too!
2 ups, 9mo
[image deleted]
1 up, 9mo
1 up, 9mo
1 up, 9mo,
1 reply
0 ups, 9mo
Went local years ago.
2 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
"The one hope for New York businesses may be the U.S. Supreme Court. Despite the deference afforded to the states and their courts, the court has occasionally intervened to block excessive damage awards.

For example, in 1996, the justices limited state-awards of punitive damages under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In that case, BMW was found to have repainted luxury cars damaged in transit without telling buyers.

An Alabama jury awarded $4,000 in compensatory damages for the loss of value in having a factory paint job, but then added $4 million in punitive damages. Even when the Alabama Supreme Court reduced that to $2 million, the U.S. Supreme Court still found it excessive. Even liberals on the Court such as John Paul Stevens and Stephen Breyer agreed that such “grossly excessive” awards raise a “basic unfairness of depriving citizens of life, liberty, or property, through the application of arbitrary coercion.”

The court may find almost half a billion dollars in damages without a single lost dollar from a victim to be a tad excessive.

That prospect will not dampen the thrill-kill environment in New York this week. In electing openly partisan prosecutors such as James and District Attorney Alvin Bragg, voters have shown a preference for political prosecutions and investigations.

In “Bonfire of the Vanities,” Tom Wolfe wrote about Sherman McCoy, a successful businessman who had achieved the status of one of the “masters of the universe” in New York. In the prosecution of McCoy for a hit-and-run, Wolfe described a city and legal system devouring itself in the politics of class and race. The book details a businessman’s fall from a great height — a fall that delighted New Yorkers.

It is doubtful Trump will end up as the same solitary figure wearing worn-out clothes before the Bronx County Criminal Court clutching a binder of legal papers. But you do not have to feel sorry or even sympathetic for Trump to see this award as obscene. The appeal will test the New York legal system to see if other judges can do what Judge Engoron found so difficult: set aside their feelings about Trump.

New York is one of our oldest and most distinguished bars. It has long resisted those who sought to use the law to pursue political opponents and unpopular figures. It will now be tested to see if those values transcend even Trump."
4 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
The judge even said during the trial “I’m not here hear what he (Trump- the defendant) has to say. “
2 ups, 9mo
If anyone says it's about the money then they are either an idiot or just another NPC dem/leftist.

And the NPCs still don't get that if a crooked judicial system can take down one of the most influential and wealthy citizens then what chance does the anyone else have including the NPCs!
3 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
Nope. Trump corruption was caught red-handed. Not the first time either.
4 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
The lenders admit they lost zero dollars on their investments in Trump properties. They admit they do their own due diligence, which is how the process works. There was no fraud PERIOD.
4 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
1000% Correct!
2 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
Wrong. He lied to get favorable terms for the loans.
2 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
Nope... the banks testified he didn't...
3 ups, 9mo
If the banks accepted his paperwork and knew they were responsible for their evaluations and nobody cried foul... yup... this whole trial was a huge election interference ploy by democrats...
0 ups, 9mo
This case is not decided by a jury, but by a judge who said during the trial “I am not here to hear what he (the defendant) has to say.”
Anyone who thinks that much bias is acceptable in the judicial system has serious mental issues.
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
AFTER THIS TRIAL, NEVER EVER; INVEST IN NEW YORK REAL ESTATE