Imgflip Logo Icon

This will probably come true within a year

This will probably come true within a year | NEW SENATE ANTI-MURDER BILL CAPS MURDERS AT 5,000 PER DAY; (inspired by, of course, the Babylon Bee) | image tagged in politics,politics suck,politicians,politicians suck,congress sucks,stupid liberals | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
606 views 24 upvotes Made by Ma_Deuce 3 months ago in politics
27 Comments
3 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
In 2017 under President Donald Trump, the US recorded its lowest number of illegal aliens entering the country in 47 years.

Only 310,000 made it across the border in 2017.

That is one-tenth the number that walked across Joe Biden’s open borders in 2023 – 3.2 million! The highest number ever by far!
3 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
Chairman Mayorkas | THE BORDER LOOKS PRETTY SECURE FROM HEEEERE!!! | image tagged in chairman mayorkas | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
I should probably stop reading your posts because when I think about what you're saying, I get angry. Really angry. With the Brandon administration, the truth always makes me angry!

We all know, that should the worst scenario play out and we get four more years of a Harris-Brandon administration, those numbers Dementia Joe has put up in his first three years will be dwarfed by what he allows to happen in his last four years.

That's so simple to figure out that even a liberal should be able to do it. So I don't want to hear anything from any liberal's pie hole about this being a republican issue or Dementia Joe not having the legal authority to resolve it. That's all bullshit. So why the average Democrat, who may want a secure (or at least more secure) border can't see this is telling. It tells us the Dem leadership. the media, and a good chunk of the psycho left wing base of their party want the invasion to continue.

And that my friend, is treason. (I know you know, so that's for the benefit of anyone else who may have the attention span to read this far into a comment... which eliminates many liberals) If Trump takes the fall for an insurrection he wasn't involved with, then once Biden is out of office, he will absolutely have to take the fall for the treasonous invasion he's allowed.
4 ups, 3mo,
3 replies
I believe they won't be able to cheat like they did in 2020. So they'll either need to find a way to cancel the election... some sort of national crisis... or they'll find a way to assassinate Trump... These criminals and their families have been in power for a long time and they were horrified when Trump won in 2016. Hillary was horrified they didn't do enough to get her elected... they then spent Trump's four years trying to get him removed... they will stop at nothing to keep power...
3 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
I don't recall a 'national crisis' clause in the Constitution.
2 ups, 3mo
And Pelosi didn't use her Jan 6 fedsurrection as an excuse to change the house rules...

oh wait... she did... never mind
3 ups, 3mo
You're spot on as usual, but I do have to disagree with one point:

"I believe they won't be able to cheat like they did in 2020. "

Why do you think that? Leading up to the 2020 election I heard many republicans say they were ready for them to cheat, and would be able to prevent it. But that talk didn't stop a damn thing.

Being ready didn't:

- mitigate big tech's quashing of almost all news about the laptop, which according to even the most moderate of polls showed Biden would have lost about 15% of his votes, had the voters known.

- stop more than 50 former senior intelligence officials from lying about the laptop by signing a letter saying the story “has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.” (sadly and ironically the one piece of news about the laptop that did receive a ton of publicity from the lying media)

- stop Twitter from censoring the speech of those on the right.

- stop states like Pennsylvania (with an AG who said if all the votes were counted, Trump would lose... and he said that *before* the election) from changing their election laws illegally at the last moment.

It was rigged before, and I see no reason why it's not rigged now. What has been done to stop it from happening again?

I hope you're right and I'm wrong. But my skeptical nature will only allow me to hope, until proven otherwise.
4 ups, 3mo
LMAO... more lib media propaganda... thanks
4 ups, 3mo
That's rich coming from the party that attacked several government buildings, and destroyed or stole several billion dollars worth of private property during the riots of 2020, and also supports a corrupt organization like BLM, which has misappropriated millions of dollars in donations for its leaders' personal uses.

Trump does the curb stomping, he doesn't get stomped. He is easily one of the best Presidents we've ever had (hey, are you American, btw?).

Unless of course you don't want a booming economy, the US respected on the world stage, and a little something called energy independence.

And let's not forget the Abraham Accords. While Trump fostered peace in the middle east, we can see what Biden's feckless foreign policy leads to. A hot war in the middle east with every chance to expand and drag us into a shooting war with Iran. And speaking of Iran, who gave them 7 billion? It was your guy. Who was helping them fast track their nuclear program (Obama) and who is trying to restart that? (Biden.) My guy was curb stomping Iran, and turning them into a bit player. Your guy has turned them back into a power player.

Trump also warned NATO nations, particularly Germany, not to rely on Russian oil. Of course the media tried to make him look like an idiot for saying that, but anyone with two brain cells to rub together now sees he was right.

And speaking of Russia, why did Putin take Crimea while Obama was in office (who did nothing about it, btw) and invade Ukraine while Biden was in office? Typical democrats, leading from behind on the world stage:

imgflip.com/i/66m9hc

imgflip.com/i/82wkqd
2 ups, 3mo
[image deleted] Da fuq ?
[deleted]
2 ups, 3mo,
2 replies
You don’t watch the news, do ya? Trump is leading Biden in the polls, and the most recent news about Biden’s memory isn’t helping. He could barely answer questions, looks super frail, he might not even make it to voting day. I’m hoping the dems kick him out and put someone like Nikki in his place, to give Trump a run for his money.
[deleted]
2 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
Also his fake outrage about his son, he should have recited the dates, all the dates, but it seems he didn’t, because he didn’t trust his ability to remember anything other that go on a rant. He really had a hard time talking.
1 up, 3mo
Biden, the guy who swore to his son - his DYING son, on his DEATH BED - that he would run instead of Hillary NOW gets outraged about him. Ugh, disgusting.
0 ups, 3mo,
2 replies
Leading by an average 1.9 points, well within the margin of error, and Trump has 9 hard months of criminal trials ahead of him and is quickly shedding independent voters.

If he makes it to the general election, he will lose in a landslide while losing the popular vote by more than 10M.
[deleted]
2 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
Also Biden has 9 months to try to cheat death and reverse his dementia before it becomes bleedingly obvious he isn’t mentally fit for the position.
0 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
You mean, as opposed to Trump who made it bleedingly obvious he wasn't mentally fit for the position in 2016?
0 ups, 2mo,
1 reply
The left often mistakes their opinions for facts, or being more popular than they actually are. It's called false consensus effect.
0 ups, 2mo
It's so weird how we think things more people vote for are popular, isn't it?
0 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
Thing is, we're lucky if any of those trials even begin by election day, let alone, conclude.

As one of a handful on the entire planet Earth that correctly predicted Trump would win in 2016 (I used to tell all the doubters back then, "I got one word for you: George W Bush"), I'd say that at this point the question isn't could Trump possibly win it's by how many millions of popular votes will he do it by. In fact, Biden has been trying so hard to lose, I'm pretty much convinced that he wasn't even supposed to win in 2020. If it wasn't for Covid, Trump would have won that too.
0 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
If you think Trump has a snowball's chance in hell of winning the popular vote, I've got a bridge to sell you. He lost that in '20 by a greater margin than '16, and that would have happened regardless of covid.

And yeah, wrecking the apportionment process has caused the electoral college to give us increasingly erratic outcomes, including two unpopular presidents in Bush and Trump, but I don't see that happening in '24 given the state of the courts.
0 ups, 3mo,
2 replies
A bit of an ironic statement, given that we're having our first big snowfall in a couple years here with the balmy Februaries we've been having!

2020 was Trump against Covid and against Trump. 2024 it's Biden against Trump and......... Biden. Now if prices of basic groceries and whatnot were to go down exceedingly noticeably like, in a week or two, Biden might have a slight chance. But since they're not going to go down, that's not going to be happening. And despite the sheer awesomeness of that glorious Infrastructure Bill supplying Rust-Oleum to covered bridges in Arkansas, nobody cares. That's not me talking, that's just the basic mentality of the voting public. Pocketbooks matter more than fleeting memories of the constant drama rama that was 2016 - 2020. People are already blaming the 2020 shortages on Biden. That's not going to change.
0 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
The problem is the "fervent base" only accounts for 20-30% of Republican voters and has been in decline since 2016 - they're just extremely loud.

These days he doesn't have a chance in the general without moderate Republicans and a hefty serving of independents, and he's pretty much lost the latter entirely, and has the former demoralized to the point they may avoid the polls entirely instead of holding their noses to vote for him as they did in 2020.

Democrats aren't going to flee to Trump because of inflation or even because their college debt didn't get paid off - they're going to bitch loudly until he becomes the official nominee, and then they'll line up behind him because the alternative is an existential threat to the nation.
0 ups, 3mo
You see, this is the very delusional attitude that got him elected in the first place and will get him elected again. You're hedging on entire blocks or demographics that you view as monolithic and assume that they will all be against Trump. Hillary made that same mistake too. Twice.
0 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
2020 was Trump against Trump's absolute bungling of the pandemic response, ridiculous trade wars, and cratering of the booming economy he'd been gifted.

2024 is Trump against Trump's insurrection, attempts to illegally overturn the election, criminal charges, general penchant for authoritarianism, and open desire to turn the US into a dictatorship.

Regardless of who runs against him, the majority of the country will, once again, vote against him by resounding margins - the only question is whether the corrupted electoral college will hand him the presidency again.

There is no chance he wins the popular election.
0 ups, 3mo
All of which is exceedingly not an issue to his rather fervent base?

You compare that to Biden's fleeing constituency who are more concerned
about what they had to pay for Valentine's Day chocolate in the past week than about a soft coup 3ya which as far as they can recall really ended up not finally happening after all. All the while, everything from polls to his own party - oh, and voters - really would rather he not run at all, and find his doddering geriatric theatrics to be not quite as cute as grandpa's. His own party is telling everybody that he's probably going to lose. Let that sink in. No other options allowed, but he's probably going to lose anyways. And no one is really too stressed about it, because Trump is going to go to jail courtesy of trials we'd be lucky to see begin before election day!

Long story short, Trump's rabid base is increasingly energized and motivated, while Biden's 'supporters' are becoming more and more likely just sit this one out, just like they did when the party-picked Hillary kicked herself in the nads in 2016, defying her own narcissistic expectations. And theirs.

Don't get me wrong, I wholeheartedly wish you were right, but you're thinking of this logically. The majority of the masses are thinking (for lack of a better term) emotionally.
Just look at all elections since Nixon. Who won that was expected to, Clinton in 1996 and W in 2004?

Those who don't remember history are going to get slapped by it, yet again.
0 ups, 3mo
[image deleted] Lmmfao
2 ups, 3mo
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
NEW SENATE ANTI-MURDER BILL CAPS MURDERS AT 5,000 PER DAY; (inspired by, of course, the Babylon Bee)