*F A C E P A L M*

Many are zoos though

Bruh

Its true though

while the info is arguably true, you use the info as a generalization. you may say that "many are zoos," but the way you use it implies that you think all are zoos. also nice pfp

That is because we didn't have current statistics.

Now we have data & sources for our argument.

Statistics
Sociology of Furry Fandom (Rust, J. D., 2001) 2% of respondents stated they were zoophiles.
https://web.archive.org/web/20050302094251/http://www.visi.com/%7Ephantos/furrysoc.html
Furry Sociological Survey (Evans, K., 2008) 17% of respondents stated they were zoophiles.
https://www.gwern.net/docs/psychology/2008-evans.pdf
2008 Furry Survey (Osaki, A., 2008) 18.4% of respondents stated they were zoophiles. https://www.klisoura.com/ot_furrysurvey2008.php
2009 Furry Survey (Osaki, A., 2009) 13.9% of respondents stated they were zoophiles.
https://klisoura.com/ot_furrysurvey2009.php
2010 Furry Survey (Osaki, A., 2010) 13.6% of respondents stated they were zoophiles.
https://klisoura.com/ot_furrysurvey2010.phphttp://klisoura.com/ot_furrysurvey2010.php
2011 Furry Survey (Osaki, A., 2011) 13.3% of respondents stated they were zoophiles.
https://www.klisoura.com/ot_furrysurvey2011.php
2012 Furry Survey (Osaki, A., 2012) 14.9% of respondents stated they were zoophiles.
https://www.klisoura.com/ot_furrysurvey.php
2019 Studies (Roberts, S., et al., 2019) 6.9% of respondents stated they were zoophiles. https://furscience.com/research-findings/appendix-1-previous-research/furscience-2019/
Male Furries (Hsu, K., Bailey, J. M., 2019) 46.7% of respondents stated they were zoophiles.
https://www.gwern.net/docs/psychology/2019-hsu.pdf
What Are Furries? (fek, 2020) 14.3% of respondents stated they were zoophiles.
https://web.archive.org/web/20210116160156/https://whatarefurries.com/

The simple average across all surveys is 16.1%. Weighing the estimates according to sample size gives a result of 14.9%.

Or about ONE IN SEVEN

We need more of this kind of research here.

that still doesn't mean they're all zoos. many are, that is shown, but you shouldn't use that for prejudice unless you have reason to believe that

I didn't say they were all zoos. I said that 1/7 furries being zoophiles is NOT NORMAL...

Max it should only be 2%, but ONE IN SEVEN?!

yeah, it's absurd

Exactly

Because he does and he's hiding that fact and doesn't realize not all furries are bad

False

If that's the case then why do most furries I encounter are AGAINST zoos?

Those are the ones you encountered, but not everyone has the same experience.

Got the same experience.
As unholy the internet seems to be, common sense is actually quite comon

I mean, not that common but yk what I mean

Ok, but just know that not all furries are bad

But your one of the bad ones. You demonize anti furries as fascists, cry over the deaths of fictional characters, start flame wars, your a furry defender and you are oversensitive.

Sounds cool, I guess

If you think any of thats cool that means you dont want to follow a path of reason but of depravity.

And your calling me over sensitive when I make a Joke you blow a fuse on me

And it wasn't sappose to be in "Bad faith" or any shit like that because I don't actually think all anti furries are actually nazis and when I do say that I'm just joking around, so think again before complaining about people getting mad at YOUR jokes

Honestly bro, like I said, I don't really care if you call me toxic because your a toxic user who is calling me toxic which is the funny part, and if you just didn't reply on my stuff and left things alone I wouldn't have to get on you like that

Am not toxic, you just cant take critique or people not acting like hippie pacifist zoomer roblox kids.

"MUH SPOONS"

yeah touch grass and come back with better arguments

How much u wanna bet Lordzerostrike is going to take this joke seriously

Let's go I won the bet

There are more zoophiles that aren't furries than zoophiles that are furries

Are you sure about that?? Then explain why do so many zoos on Twitter have furry profile pics and many times appear to like furry stuff???

I gotta admit, you're using "many are zoos" as a direct generalization, which paints all of them in a bad light. I have met several friends who are furries, and they've told me their experiences in both the fandom and in regular life. Memes de-humanizing furries and painting them as something that they are not is kinda boring. I mean, why would you do that?

Nah he doesn't know yet

And anti furries are not fascists

Gotta agree with xmm

*Then why is their NSFW based off of animals??*

Not all furries are into nsfw

Just because the wiki says so doesn't mean you should be going out accusing all furries of being zoophiles

And yiff isn't zoophilic you guys are turning it to make it seem zoophilic, but either way it's still bad, and most furries agree, cmon man I thought u already knew this aren't you natural with furries?

This shows that furries suffer from awful p0rn addiction.

If furries aren’t zoophiles, then why is all their NSFW art based on animals? - Haloguy7

Statistics
Sociology of Furry Fandom (Rust, J. D., 2001) 2% of respondents stated they were zoophiles.
https://web.archive.org/web/20050302094251/http://www.visi.com/%7Ephantos/furrysoc.html
Furry Sociological Survey (Evans, K., 2008) 17% of respondents stated they were zoophiles.
https://www.gwern.net/docs/psychology/2008-evans.pdf
2008 Furry Survey (Osaki, A., 2008) 18.4% of respondents stated they were zoophiles. https://www.klisoura.com/ot_furrysurvey2008.php
2009 Furry Survey (Osaki, A., 2009) 13.9% of respondents stated they were zoophiles.
https://klisoura.com/ot_furrysurvey2009.php
2010 Furry Survey (Osaki, A., 2010) 13.6% of respondents stated they were zoophiles.
https://klisoura.com/ot_furrysurvey2010.phphttp://klisoura.com/ot_furrysurvey2010.php
2011 Furry Survey (Osaki, A., 2011) 13.3% of respondents stated they were zoophiles.
https://www.klisoura.com/ot_furrysurvey2011.php
2012 Furry Survey (Osaki, A., 2012) 14.9% of respondents stated they were zoophiles.
https://www.klisoura.com/ot_furrysurvey.php
2019 Studies (Roberts, S., et al., 2019) 6.9% of respondents stated they were zoophiles. https://furscience.com/research-findings/appendix-1-previous-research/furscience-2019/
Male Furries (Hsu, K., Bailey, J. M., 2019) 46.7% of respondents stated they were zoophiles.
https://www.gwern.net/docs/psychology/2019-hsu.pdf
What Are Furries? (fek, 2020) 14.3% of respondents stated they were zoophiles.
https://web.archive.org/web/20210116160156/https://whatarefurries.com/

The simple average across all surveys is 16.1%. Weighing the estimates according to sample size gives a result of 14.9%.

This is just an extra lmfao

Dont even try to argue with Creeper. He is extremely oversensitive, cannot take criticism, and acts like an average furry defender. Not to mention he claims that anti furries are "sadistic" only because we are fighting against the toxic furries with bravery and might.

That you

Creeper, how about you stop arguing and acceot the truth.

Dude I said not all, are you tryna claim that all furries are into nsfw? Wtf? Also the Internet isn't always accurate

Bro a good chunk of them have a p0rn addiction problem.

Ok but that doesnt make them zoophiles

Also I'm against porn, because first of all, it makes the furries look bad, 2nd of all, it's bad in general not just yiff, porn in general is bad

You guys don't like being called Nazis so stop calling furries zoophiles

Anti-furries aren't proven to be Nazis.

Furries, were proven to have a ONE IN SEVEN chance of being a zoophile.

Capitalized because for the 17th time in one argument you guys are twisting my words and saying.

"yOu tHiNk tHaT aLl fUrRiEs ArE zOoPhIlEs, tHaT'S uNtRuE"

Even after I capitalized ONE IN SEVEN.

So let me spell it out even further

*Inhales*
--------------
Definitions
--------------
ONE-The lowest cardinal number; half of two; 1.

FRACTION-A numerical quantity that is not a whole number (e.g. 1/2, 0.5).

SEVEN-Equivalent to the sum of three and four; one more than six, or three less than ten; 7.
--------------------------
Direct Explanations
--------------------------

ONE IN SEVEN
1/7
NOT ALL
14.3%

FIX: Anti-furries weren't proven to be mostly Nazis. It is a few of them and before you say, "You stereotype us for a few, why can't we?"

We could call you Nazis just like how you call us Nazis, but we don't. Because it isn't the majority.

And you can't stereotype someone for being in a group about attacking a fandom

What fandom are those nazi furries attacking??

Because all I see are NaI and fascist furries

Well yeah but the thing is that it seems very out of place

Although the for anti furries it's very similar

Exactly. The anti furries have a few Nazis just like how the furry fandom has Nazis.

But the bad part is that the Nazi furries are still accepted into the fandom.

When is anti furries find Nazi anti furries. We swiftly ban them from all anti furry discord servers.

When anti furries*

As long as you don't assume most furries are zoophiles, but no doubt their are furries with porn addiction and are zoophiles

I am neutral with the REAL FURRIES.

The ones that don't watch porn all day. Or rape dogs, or even sexually assault CHILDREN!! Like dude, if some furries want to rape dogs; you're a horrible person. If you have a cripling porn addiction. You and ONLY you can fix that.
BUT THE CHILDREN?!

I am friends with multiple furries on Oculus, and we have a great time shooting eachother!!

Jokes aside, stop assuming & get educated, keyboard troll.

Yeah I get that, but why are you assuming majority of furries are like that?

Do I need to post screenshots??

And news articles.

And YOUR OWN FANDOM

And my personal experience with furries sexually assaulting me

Ok I get that, but like I said, that doesn't mean when you encounter a furry they are most likely going to be involved with that stuff

And I'm sorry for that trauma with the furry doing that to you, I truly am, that person should be locked up

What is your discord??

We can't keep spamming imgflip with arguments lmfao

Cuz I thought u were going to be chill in there

:/

Dude, I'm anti-furry, of course I'm going to give an argumentative essay lmfao

I didn't kick you my friend did, btw that wasn't a furry server, that was a task force made to go up against anti furries Led by me, you f**ked up lol

Why’d you block me lol

Then why did you invite me lmfao??

BRO SOMEONE WITH A DISCORD ON THIS SITE FINALLY!! Lol

I'll just inv you to a server by memechat

"Just because the wiki says so"

We have statistics that show 1 in 7 furries are zoophiles.

You have a couple screenshots of the SAME DISCORD SERVER.

I have that too.

Ok I can play that game, also you already stereotype furries, by calling majority of them zoophiles

there's more

First of all... Top flag isn't for anti furries. It is just the Nazi flag (If this was taken from THE Nazi anti furry server I apologize)

Second of all, I'll bet these flags were all taken from the same server, or the same people in the Nazi anti furry server.

I was comparing them to the natural Nazi flag I didn't call it an anti furry flag

Ok how else do you want to describe it? “Weird Nazi Flag”?

There is nothing natural about the Nazi flag. Your misusing the term "natural"

Dude, we argued about this in another chat.

I. Didn't. Say. Majority.

Why can't you comprehend that??

Tu quoque fallacy

Typical of furries

Dude I didn't say All furries weren't zoophiles and toxic I said not ALL furries are zoophiles and toxic

And?? That sounds like an excuse to decieve people from looking at the toxic side of furries.

Ok sure I definitely was planning that 🙄

Meanwhile you defend gjyg posting feral p0rn and fetishizing animal body parts and accuse me of being a bully for calling him out.

And who are this "sadists" your talking about???

People that enjoy the suffering of others