Michael "SHILL"enberger.

According to nasa, arctic ice has been increasing 1% per decade since the 1900’s. Which makes everything you posted wrong. 🤣😂🤣

Actually that's ice in Antartica that has been increasing, not Artic. So you were semi - or, rather, hemi - right.

So we now all agree that Antarctic sea ice is increasing decade over decade.

Soon we’ll all agree that not a single dire prediction of the climate doomsayers has ever come true.

Well the OP is insisting on 'disagreeing' by............ agreeing.

But we got a bigger problem than me supposedly being able to grow bananas in my backyard by 2014 lke Al Gore promised. See, things should be warmer. A LOT warmer. As seen in that pic, parts of Florida currently above sea level should be near 28 feet under, as it was during the last interglacial. 140,000ya it was so warm and the Artic so low on ice, the cute polar bear almost became extinct. But it made it. Then again, it wasn't starving to death back then like they are now as we strip the oceans bare of everything but jellyfish so we can complain about being fat and make sure kitty is well fed too.

Yet this current interglacial never warmed up as much nor as quickly as the previous interglacials, and scientists can't explain why. Continental shifts have been a mere inch or two (forgive me, been a while, I'm rusty), so that doesn't explain it. And in 2000 yrs it's be glaciation time again, and we can nuke all the coal in the world and that won't do a dang thing to stop it.

Something bad is going down, and it's scarier than being 3 degrees higher.

in 2000 yrs it'll* be

An explanation for this phenomenon in the Arctic is the fact that the Earth's magnetic field is weakening and allowing in more solar protons and where they are funneled to the polar cusps this intrusion is the strongest. As Earth's magnetic field continues weakening it will be these polar cusps that continue to take in more and more of the solar particle forcing that is apparently still ignored by the mainstream. We are indeed well on our way to another Ice Age which will undoubtedly be brought about by a coronal mass ejection and with a severely compromised magnetic field this event May take place in as little as 50 years not 2000.

Not only are you wrong, you're hilariously wrong.

https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/arctic-sea-ice/

According to NASA, it's been decreasing 12% per decade since 1979.

But let's pretend that your made-up nonsense is right. It's not, but we're going to pretend.

If it increased by 1% per decade, then from 1900 to 1980 it increased by 8%.

Then in 1980 it decreased by 12%. Immediately erasing all of the 1% progress of the previous 80 years..

Then it happened again in 1990.

Then it decreased by 12% for the next 33 years in a row.

So, if your rate of 1% increase per decade had been true for the last 1,000 years, by what decade marker had we completely wiped out that 1% per decade growth? 1990? 2000?

He got the Artic mixed up with Antartica - the latter witnessing the ice increase.