Imgflip Logo Icon
image tagged in merry christmas,maga morons,stinks,clown car republicans,christmas,loser trump | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
193 views โ€ข 4 upvotes โ€ข Made by dragonfire999 4 months ago in politics
30 Comments
10 ups, 4mo,
2 replies
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
4 ups, 4mo,
1 reply
Libs mocking kids for being conservative... Kind of says it all... ๐Ÿ˜‚
4 ups, 4mo,
1 reply
There's definitely psychological issues, like, insecurity, jealousy and lack of self worth and possibly self identity in the Demo mockerโ€ฆhowever, there is also a bad, evil and/or malicious intent to harm the children being mocked. I personally think their goal, is to tear the targeted child down with words. What kind of person does this? Someone devoid of empathy, love, compassionโ€ฆ their soul is sick.
3 ups, 4mo,
1 reply
It's Christmas... and they'll do that to their kids?

SICK!
4 ups, 4mo,
3 replies
It's one of the Liberal pathological ways of addressing their insecurity, inferiority, inadequacy & low self esteem. Libs with these issues are narcissists who feel the need to soothe their insecurities, inferiorities and have a perceived superficial boost of self worth by making fun of, looking down upon, judging, & putting down the children they target. It's absolutely disgusting.
3 ups, 4mo,
1 reply
"I knew you were going to try that shit. You think that because the article didn't say "these are proven conservatives" that they aren't. Oklahoma is a conservative state. "

Hearsay and all assumptions on your part at the very least, but, could also be defined as bold faced lies, propaganda or bullshit!

Try again, OM, and cease grasping at straws at the bottom of the barrel.

"So you criticized the people who harassed David Hogg?"

David Hogg was 18, an adult, NOT a Child. Your overreaching, OM. Just admit you've once again lost the debate and move on. It's becoming laughable.

"How so"

And again, your stance is extremely biased and hypocritical. It's evident you're only going to condemn harassment of children when it fits your narrative and when not targeting a child is fair game in your eyes. All Children, no matter what the issue should ever be mocked, targeted for harassment or used as a pawn for any political narrative. Anyone who disagrees should be ashamed of themselves.

Maybe find a new hobby.
3 ups, 4mo,
1 reply
"Pointing out that conservatives live in a conservative state is grasping at straws? Or did you mean pointing out that conservatives have a history of bigotry against LGBTQ people is grasping at straws?"

As I originally stated, provide an example involving a proven conservative. There is nothing anywhere in that article that states conservatives were involved. It is all hearsay and assumptions on your part. For all we know it may have been liberals involved, and I could have stated that as well, however, I will not lower myself to making assumptions or trying to provide hearsay as fact in the debate. Only desperate people would stoop that low.

"I gave you a real life example of people making threats of violence against a transgender child, people who were most definitely conservative."

Your argument is weak and negated because it is not proven that the incident was instigated by conservatives. It never stated that conservatives were involved anywhere in the article you provided that coincidentally was published by CNN. And, you and I both know, if a conservative was involved it would have been plastered on every newspaper and liberal run news site 24/7, which it was not

" Your response was not to criticize the people who made the threats of violence, but to try to pretend they weren't actually conservative."

That is unproven, and a lie at the very least you were jumping to conclusions. And, your argument is based on assumptions, and, not hold up in the court of law.

"I gave evidence supporting my claim they were most likely conservative, you gave no evidence at all showing that they were not conservative."

You provided no such evidence, only assumptions, to fit your narrative.

I'm glad you're finding a new hobby! I think the time away and change will be like a breath of fresh air and hopefully you will see the errors of your ways.

Jesus loves everyone, even you!
3 ups, 4mo
"What does "proven conservative" mean?"

It would at the very least include the article you provided stating that the people involved in the harassment were Conservatives, which in fact it DID NOT.

"It doesn't need to. You're setting up an unreasonable expectation. "

Yes, it DOES need to, you have to provide FACTS to back up your argument in a debate or a court of law, not overreaching assumptions.

"The evidence clearly points to the people being conservative in all likelihood."

No, it most certainly does not. Only in your mind does that take place.

"No, it's not"

Yes, it most certainly is all hearsay and assumptions on your part. And, no matter how many times you repeat your assumption, jump up and down and scream, it will never change the fact that the people involved were never proved to be conservatives. It never stated that information in the article YOU provided.

"Because news articles don't usually specify that. They just explain what happened."

There you go, that proves that you jumped to conclusions when you stated that the individuals involved were conservative.

"It's not jumping to conclusions to make a reasonable inference based on the known facts"

It is indeed jumping to conclusions and making assumptions when the facts you claim to have do not exist. Take a deep breath and try again, OM.

I'll wait!
๐Ÿ˜š
4 ups, 4mo,
1 reply
Provide an example of a conservative featured submission meme making death threats against children on imgflip . I'll wait.
4 ups, 4mo,
1 reply
Provide an example of a proven conservative making death threats against a CHILD and I will condemn that individual. Can you condemn the user who created this meme mocking a child? If not you're a hypocrite.
3 ups, 4mo
I stated PROVEN Conservative. That article you posted did not imply that the people making threats were Conservatives, and we all know if a Conservative was involved CNN would have been screaming it from the rooftops for months on end

Try again, OM, I'll wait.

Although. Unlike you, I condemn anyone who mocks or threatens a child.

And yes, your stance on the issue is extremely biased and very hypocritical.
4 ups, 4mo
Your sarcasm indicates that you endorse mocking children. I can't say that I'm surprised.
[deleted]
1 up, 4mo,
1 reply
2 ups, 4mo,
1 reply
"And as I pointed out earlier, news articles don't include information like that"

Incorrect, when any conservative is involved in anything negative it ALWAYS makes the front page or lead story on all MSM News services.

"I provided enough facts for me to justify my position that the people involved were *most likely* conservatives"

Incorrect, yet again. You DID NOT provide any facts, only assumptions.

"Deep red state. Small town. Anti-LGBTQ bigotry. These are all things which make it pretty clear that the people involved were *most likely* conservatives."

Equates to absolutely nothing, heterosexual liberals also reside in that state, many of whom do not share your ideology or point of view. Again, all assumptions on your behalf.

"Why are you so fixated on this concept of proof knowing that that's not necessary to show what's most likely. Can you prove to me you're not an AI program and not a real human being? No, you can't. Does that mean it's reasonable for me to conclude that you're not a real human being?"

I am fixated on factual information not what YOU feel is most likely. Debates and the rule of law are based on factual information, not in your individual beliefs.

"Jumping to conclusions makes it sound like my conclusion was not based on any evidence at all. The facts given in the story are enough evidence for me to conclude that the people involved were *most likely* conservatives"

Your evidence & conclusion (which you most definitely jumped to) was based on non factual information and therefore would not hold up in ANY debate or ANY courtroom.

"The story involves a small school district in Oklahoma. That is a fact. Small towns in Oklahoma are typically conservative. That is also a fact."

Although the story involves a school district in Oklahoma, it does NOT mean people involved were Conservatives, nor did it even imply that in the article YOU supplied to support your argument.

Surely you can do better. Keep trying & I'll keep waiting!
๐Ÿ˜š
[deleted]
1 up, 4mo,
1 reply
1 up, 4mo
"Nope"

Absolutely, without a shadow of a doubt!

"And that's why I said "most likely". I can't prove it to your satisfaction, but who cares? Any halfway honest and reasonable person knows that Oklahoma is a predominantly conservative state. Any halfway honest and reasonable person also knows that conservatives are far more likely than liberals to have a problem with LGBTQ people. By your logic, since there are some Christians in Saudi Arabia, that means I shouldn't assume that the average Saudi is a Muslim."

"Most likely" does not equate to 100% certainty, and even if Oklahoma is predominantly Conservative, there are also Liberals who reside there who are heterosexual and do NOT share your point of view.

"By your logic, since there are some Christians in Saudi Arabia, that means I shouldn't assume that the average Saudi is a Muslim."

You are finely catching on, bravo! You should not assume ANYTHING. Especially when accusing a person or an entire group of people of a crime.

"I hate to break it to you, but if something can't be proven 100%, then all we can do is figure out what is most likely"

This argument is flawed and "Most likely" will NEVER equate to guilt. So sorry to rain on your parade.

"So you're saying that it's not a fact that Oklahoma is a predominantly conservative state?

That is incorrect, I NEVER stated that.

"And just to make sure I'm absolutely clear, I'm not saying 100% of residents in Oklahoma are conservative. "

That is crystal clear & I never at any time implied you stated 100% of residents in Oklahoma
are conservative.

"I'm saying more than half are conservative, especially in rural areas."

This means absolutely NOTHING nor does it support your argument in any way.

"And once again, that's why I keep saying "most likely". I'm not falling into your trap of not being able to conclude something is likely just because I can't prove it to a mathematical certainty."

Your concluding statement verifies that you argument is not based in fact and only on assumptions which will never not hold up in a debate or ANY court of law. Also, " Most likely" will NEVER equate to guilt!
We are all innocent until proven guilty not assumed guilty.
8 ups, 4mo,
1 reply

Merry Sniffmas
5 ups, 4mo
4 ups, 4mo,
1 reply
Lib parents mocking their conservative child... Yup... ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚
3 ups, 4mo
No... I find it funny though... a meme showing just how mean lib parents are... ๐Ÿ˜†๐Ÿ˜‚
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator