Incoherent Speeches

You're thinking of Joe Biden.

If only it were true. Fact is it is the coherent parts that are the problem.

He always says the bad parts the loudest.

The truth is very bad to liars.

Alex Jones has been right more often than not.

I don't think he mean right like "correct", I think he means right like "alt-right".

You hear what you want to hear.

Guilty as Sin. Rather suboptimal when folks insist on doing that, innit?

One question I ask is did Alex Jones tell his listeners to harass the parents of the victims of Sandy Hook?

That's fair. I'd like to hear what they did to the harassers and threateners. I'd like to hear the names of these people. Because they're guilty in my eyes.

Until they actually get caught and prosecuted and admit they harkened the call... Then I predict they'd be called patriots and hostages or agents of the FBI and antifa. The magasplaining would be legendary in any case.

Do you call yourself a neoconin earnest?

Personally have suspended thinking too much about most of the whatever-ism's until our democracy either gets pulled back from the brink or goes over the cliff inside maga's clown car. If democracy prevails, such opinions might retain some purpose. Otherwise, fascist/authoritarian regimes typically frown on such free thinking.

"Our democracy." We're a Republic. Read the constitution. And the declaration of independence while you're at it. I know that's asking a lot from a stupid lib.

In the same way that Mom's for Liberty is actually for "Liberty" or the Freedom Caucus is actually for "Freedom" or how the "Save The Forest" Act prevented forest fires by allowing private companies to chop down the trees... that is the same spirit in which I name myself Ultra Red Neo Con Patriot.

Are you a globalist?

Start calling all the names you want, but that Constitutional Republic B.S. Banana Republican talking point just does not hold water. We the people is all about representative government. And nobody parroting that load of malarky has any interest in the continuation of the constitution.

If (and it's still a big if) that traitor (and he is blatantly a traitor) gets removed from the ballot for being a traitor, it will be because he violated the very constitution he want's to use as toilet paper. It will be the culmination of a case that was brought forth by his fellow republicans and if it succeeds, it will be because his own appointed supreme court judges failed to further eviscerate the constitution for him. Dude spends all day stepping in his own shite and blaming everybody else, but we all know where the aroma is coming from.

Also, none of us who actually read the constitution in the 4th grade need to have it reinterpreted for us by folks whose response to continually losing elections is to eliminate the elections rather than expanding their platform to include more of the people they pretend to represent.

We're reinterpreting it?

Sounds like the innocent people who were harassed and threatened should go after the harassers and threateners. Do you know any of the names of those individuals?